Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 Tennessee opinions name it 2 courts 1989–2025 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Tennessee courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Jacksongreen2 sentences1989The Supreme Court of Washington also rejected application of the Gates standard under that State’s constitution, characterizing it as “nebulous.” State v. Jackson, 102 Wash.2d 432, 435 , 688 P.2d 136, 139 (1984). 1989The Supreme Court of Washington also rejected application of the Gates standard under that State’s constitution, characterizing it as “nebulous.” State v. Jackson, 102 Wash.2d 432, 435 , 688 P.2d 136, 139 (1984). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Tennessee. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Illinois v. Gates
green
2 sentences2025Id. at 308 . 2025Id. at 308 . | 2 | 2020–2025 |
State v. Jacumin
green
2 sentences2017The Jaeumin Court conceded that “the task of the issuing magistrates and the duty of the reviewing eourt[s] ... are the same under either the Gates standard or the Aguilar ITlSpinelli standard.” Id. at 435 n.2. 2017The Jaeumin Court conceded that “the task of the issuing magistrates and the duty of the reviewing eourt[s] ... are the same under either the Gates standard or the Aguilar ITlSpinelli standard.” Id. at 435 n.2. | 2 | 2014–2017 |
Meadows v. State
green
2 sentences2014Because the Court of Criminal Appeals had previously applied the Illinois v. Gates standard in nine cases, our decision in Meadows v. State to abandon the Gates standard was clearly a result “not dictated by precedent.” Meadows v. State, 849 S.W.2d at 751-53 . 2014Because the Court of Criminal Appeals had previously applied the Illinois v. Gates standard in nine cases, our decision in Meadows v. State to abandon the Gates standard was clearly a result “not dictated by precedent.” Meadows v. State, 849 S.W.2d at 751-53 . | 2 | 2014–2014 |
State v. Jones
green
2 sentences1989Further, see State v. Jones, 706 P.2d 317 (Alaska 1985) and People v. Johnson, 66 N.Y.2d 398 , 497 N.Y.S.2d 618 , 488 N.E.2d 439 (1985) for decisions of similar import. 1989Further, see State v. Jones, 706 P.2d 317 (Alaska 1985) and People v. Johnson, 66 N.Y.2d 398 , 497 N.Y.S.2d 618 , 488 N.E.2d 439 (1985) for decisions of similar import. | 1 | 1989–1989 |
People v. Johnson
green
2 sentences1989Further, see State v. Jones, 706 P.2d 317 (Alaska 1985) and People v. Johnson, 66 N.Y.2d 398 , 497 N.Y.S.2d 618 , 488 N.E.2d 439 (1985) for decisions of similar import. 1989Further, see State v. Jones, 706 P.2d 317 (Alaska 1985) and People v. Johnson, 66 N.Y.2d 398 , 497 N.Y.S.2d 618 , 488 N.E.2d 439 (1985) for decisions of similar import. | 1 | 1989–1989 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.