Account information only. It is never shown to the AI client you connect, and it is kept apart from your research — which is not logged at all.
Your token is the key to the MCP: claude.ai custom connectors and ChatGPT developer mode take it in the URL; Claude Code and the rest take it as a bearer header. It is also in your welcome email. Install instructions.
No token yet. One token per address, shown once and mailed to you with setup steps — claude.ai custom connectors and ChatGPT developer mode need it in the URL; Claude Code and the rest take it as a bearer header. Install instructions.
Your MCP token. Anyone holding it can search on your subscription, so keep it off shared screens.
Header form (recommended) — this endpoint, with
Authorization: Bearer <your token>.
URL form — for claude.ai custom connectors and ChatGPT developer mode, which cannot set a header. The whole credential is in the address:
The dedicated fast index: searches run on a machine nobody else queues for, with full-text highlighted excerpts. Higher MCP limits, and semantic search when it lands.
See ProThank you.
Manage billingDelete my account: email [email protected] and it is done by hand, usually the same day. (Self-serve deletion is not built yet.)
Free, and it takes a minute. Registered visitors skip the Cloudflare checks, and your MCP token for Claude or ChatGPT is issued at the end of this.
Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
Here is your MCP token. It is shown once — it is also in the welcome email we just sent you, with setup steps.
Header form (recommended) — this endpoint, with
Authorization: Bearer <your token>.
URL form — for claude.ai custom connectors and ChatGPT developer mode, which cannot set a header. The whole credential is in the address:
That address already had a token, so we did not issue a second one — two live credentials for one mailbox is how people end up with a working laptop and a broken office machine. Your connector URL is in your inbox under “Your Syfert legal research connector URL”; if it is gone, call 904-383-7448.
9 California opinions name it 2 courts 1902–2021 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by California courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
People v. Wellsgreen2 sentences1959(People v. Green (1952), 111 Cal.App.2d 794 [ 245 P.2d 526 ]; People v. Vosburg (1954), 123 Cal.App.2d 535 [ 266 P.2d 927 ].) Although the fact that a defendant testified to certain matters on direct examination does not automatically permit cross-examination on those matters (see People v. Wells (1949), 33 Cal.2d 330, 340 [ 202 P.2d 53 ], to the effect that the “open the gates doctrine” does not always apply), here the questions asked dealt directly with a subject important to defendant’s defense. 1959(People v. Green (1952), 111 Cal.App.2d 794 [ 245 P.2d 526 ]; People v. Vosburg (1954), 123 Cal.App.2d 535 [ 266 P.2d 927 ].) Although the fact that a defendant testified to certain matters on direct examination does not automatically permit cross-examination on those matters (see People v. Wells (1949), 33 Cal.2d 330, 340 [ 202 P.2d 53 ], to the effect that the “open the gates doctrine” does not always apply), here the questions asked dealt directly with a subject important to defendant’s defense. | 2 | 2 |
People v. Kershawgreen1 sentence2016(People v. Kershaw, supra, 147 Cal.App.3d at p. 754, fn. 2 .) 17 from the totality of facts and circumstances known to the officers was not. | 1 | 1 |
People v. MacAvoygreen2 sentences1985Suppression is available, with certain exceptions noted below, only where the warrant is both invalid and served in bad faith; and, as to pending cases, we are told Leon is retroactive. ( People v. MacAvoy (1984) 162 Cal. App.3d 746, 760 [ 209 Cal. Rptr. 34 ]; People v. Helmquist (1984) 161 Cal. App.3d 609, 616 [ 207 Cal. Rptr. 718 ], mod. 162 Cal. App.3d 202e.) The momentous nature of the Leon decision can be appreciated by reference to Justice Brennan's bitter dissent: "It now appears that the Court's victory over the Fourth Amendment is complete. 1985Suppression is available, with certain exceptions noted below, only where the warrant is both invalid and served in bad faith; and, as to pending cases, we are told Leon is retroactive. ( People v. MacAvoy (1984) 162 Cal. App.3d 746, 760 [ 209 Cal. Rptr. 34 ]; People v. Helmquist (1984) 161 Cal. App.3d 609, 616 [ 207 Cal. Rptr. 718 ], mod. 162 Cal. App.3d 202e.) The momentous nature of the Leon decision can be appreciated by reference to Justice Brennan's bitter dissent: "It now appears that the Court's victory over the Fourth Amendment is complete. | 1 | 1 |
People v. Helmquistgreen2 sentences1985Suppression is available, with certain exceptions noted below, only where the warrant is both invalid and served in bad faith; and, as to pending cases, we are told Leon is retroactive. ( People v. MacAvoy (1984) 162 Cal. App.3d 746, 760 [ 209 Cal. Rptr. 34 ]; People v. Helmquist (1984) 161 Cal. App.3d 609, 616 [ 207 Cal. Rptr. 718 ], mod. 162 Cal. App.3d 202e.) The momentous nature of the Leon decision can be appreciated by reference to Justice Brennan's bitter dissent: "It now appears that the Court's victory over the Fourth Amendment is complete. 1985Suppression is available, with certain exceptions noted below, only where the warrant is both invalid and served in bad faith; and, as to pending cases, we are told Leon is retroactive. ( People v. MacAvoy (1984) 162 Cal. App.3d 746, 760 [ 209 Cal. Rptr. 34 ]; People v. Helmquist (1984) 161 Cal. App.3d 609, 616 [ 207 Cal. Rptr. 718 ], mod. 162 Cal. App.3d 202e.) The momentous nature of the Leon decision can be appreciated by reference to Justice Brennan's bitter dissent: "It now appears that the Court's victory over the Fourth Amendment is complete. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in California. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
People v. Green
green
2 sentences1959(People v. Green (1952), 111 Cal.App.2d 794 [ 245 P.2d 526 ]; People v. Vosburg (1954), 123 Cal.App.2d 535 [ 266 P.2d 927 ].) Although the fact that a defendant testified to certain matters on direct examination does not automatically permit cross-examination on those matters (see People v. Wells (1949), 33 Cal.2d 330, 340 [ 202 P.2d 53 ], to the effect that the “open the gates doctrine” does not always apply), here the questions asked dealt directly with a subject important to defendant’s defense. 1959(People v. Green (1952), 111 Cal.App.2d 794 [ 245 P.2d 526 ]; People v. Vosburg (1954), 123 Cal.App.2d 535 [ 266 P.2d 927 ].) Although the fact that a defendant testified to certain matters on direct examination does not automatically permit cross-examination on those matters (see People v. Wells (1949), 33 Cal.2d 330, 340 [ 202 P.2d 53 ], to the effect that the “open the gates doctrine” does not always apply), here the questions asked dealt directly with a subject important to defendant’s defense. | 2 | 1959–1959 |
People v. Vosburg
green
2 sentences1959(People v. Green (1952), 111 Cal.App.2d 794 [ 245 P.2d 526 ]; People v. Vosburg (1954), 123 Cal.App.2d 535 [ 266 P.2d 927 ].) Although the fact that a defendant testified to certain matters on direct examination does not automatically permit cross-examination on those matters (see People v. Wells (1949), 33 Cal.2d 330, 340 [ 202 P.2d 53 ], to the effect that the “open the gates doctrine” does not always apply), here the questions asked dealt directly with a subject important to defendant’s defense. 1959(People v. Green (1952), 111 Cal.App.2d 794 [ 245 P.2d 526 ]; People v. Vosburg (1954), 123 Cal.App.2d 535 [ 266 P.2d 927 ].) Although the fact that a defendant testified to certain matters on direct examination does not automatically permit cross-examination on those matters (see People v. Wells (1949), 33 Cal.2d 330, 340 [ 202 P.2d 53 ], to the effect that the “open the gates doctrine” does not always apply), here the questions asked dealt directly with a subject important to defendant’s defense. | 2 | 1959–1959 |
In Re Freeman
green
1 sentence2021For example, in In re Freeman (2006) 38 Cal.4th 630 , the petitioner claimed the prosecutor had struck prospective jurors he believed were Jewish. | 1 | 2021–2021 |
Illinois v. Gates
green
1 sentence2016Gates noted "[o]ur decisions applying the totality-of-the-circumstances analysis . . . have consistently recognized the value of corroboration of details of an informant's tip by independent police work . . . [and] an officer 'may rely upon information received through an informant, rather than upon his direct observations, so long as the informant's statement is reasonably corroborated by other matters within the officer's knowledge.' " (Illinois v. Gates, supra, 462 U.S. at pp. 241-242.) Here, the tip (that Benford recently had a gun) was circumstantially corroborated by the independent disc | 1 | 2016–2016 |
People v. Alvarado
green
1 sentence2016(People v. Alvarado (2006) 141 Cal.App.4th 1577 (Alvarado).) He alternatively claims his counsel was ineffective for not objecting and reversal is warranted based on ineffective assistance of counsel. 6 Indeed, Gates's analysis undermines Benford's claim that the tip can provide no support for the probable cause finding. | 1 | 2016–2016 |
Bonner v. City of Santa Ana
green
2 sentences2001In Bonner v. City of Santa Ana (1996) 45 Cal.App.4th 1465 , 53 Cal.Rptr.2d 671 , the plaintiff was a homeless person who kept all of his property in a trash bag which he stored in some bushes near the city hall. 2001In Bonner v. City of Santa Ana (1996) 45 Cal.App.4th 1465 , 53 Cal.Rptr.2d 671 , the plaintiff was a homeless person who kept all of his property in a trash bag which he stored in some bushes near the city hall. | 1 | 2001–2001 |
Gates v. Jensen
green
2 sentences1990(See also Annot., Malpractice—Alternative Diagnosis Modes (1985) 38 A.L.R.4th 900 .) The cases discussed above ( Cobbs, supra, 8 Cal.3d 229 ; Truman, supra, 27 Cal.3d 285 ; Gates, supra, 595 P.2d 919 ; and Keogan, supra, 622 P.2d 1246 ) uniformly involved the liability of treating physicians or therapists. 1990(See also Annot., Malpractice—Alternative Diagnosis Modes (1985) 38 A.L.R.4th 900 .) The cases discussed above ( Cobbs, supra, 8 Cal.3d 229 ; Truman, supra, 27 Cal.3d 285 ; Gates, supra, 595 P.2d 919 ; and Keogan, supra, 622 P.2d 1246 ) uniformly involved the liability of treating physicians or therapists. | 1 | 1990–1990 |
Cobbs v. Grant
green
2 sentences1990(See also Annot., Malpractice—Alternative Diagnosis Modes (1985) 38 A.L.R.4th 900 .) The cases discussed above ( Cobbs, supra, 8 Cal.3d 229 ; Truman, supra, 27 Cal.3d 285 ; Gates, supra, 595 P.2d 919 ; and Keogan, supra, 622 P.2d 1246 ) uniformly involved the liability of treating physicians or therapists. 1990(See also Annot., Malpractice—Alternative Diagnosis Modes (1985) 38 A.L.R.4th 900 .) The cases discussed above ( Cobbs, supra, 8 Cal.3d 229 ; Truman, supra, 27 Cal.3d 285 ; Gates, supra, 595 P.2d 919 ; and Keogan, supra, 622 P.2d 1246 ) uniformly involved the liability of treating physicians or therapists. | 1 | 1990–1990 |
Keogan v. Holy Family Hospital
green
2 sentences1990(See also Annot., Malpractice—Alternative Diagnosis Modes (1985) 38 A.L.R.4th 900 .) The cases discussed above ( Cobbs, supra, 8 Cal.3d 229 ; Truman, supra, 27 Cal.3d 285 ; Gates, supra, 595 P.2d 919 ; and Keogan, supra, 622 P.2d 1246 ) uniformly involved the liability of treating physicians or therapists. 1990(See also Annot., Malpractice—Alternative Diagnosis Modes (1985) 38 A.L.R.4th 900 .) The cases discussed above ( Cobbs, supra, 8 Cal.3d 229 ; Truman, supra, 27 Cal.3d 285 ; Gates, supra, 595 P.2d 919 ; and Keogan, supra, 622 P.2d 1246 ) uniformly involved the liability of treating physicians or therapists. | 1 | 1990–1990 |
Truman v. Thomas
green
2 sentences1990(See also Annot., Malpractice—Alternative Diagnosis Modes (1985) 38 A.L.R.4th 900 .) The cases discussed above ( Cobbs, supra, 8 Cal.3d 229 ; Truman, supra, 27 Cal.3d 285 ; Gates, supra, 595 P.2d 919 ; and Keogan, supra, 622 P.2d 1246 ) uniformly involved the liability of treating physicians or therapists. 1990(See also Annot., Malpractice—Alternative Diagnosis Modes (1985) 38 A.L.R.4th 900 .) The cases discussed above ( Cobbs, supra, 8 Cal.3d 229 ; Truman, supra, 27 Cal.3d 285 ; Gates, supra, 595 P.2d 919 ; and Keogan, supra, 622 P.2d 1246 ) uniformly involved the liability of treating physicians or therapists. | 1 | 1990–1990 |
United States v. Leon
green
2 sentences1985(Id., at p. 906 [ 82 L.Ed.2d at p. 687 ].) A warrant’s validity is no longer the sole inquiry at a suppression hearing, merely a first step in the analysis. 1985(Id., at p. 906 [ 82 L.Ed.2d at p. 687 ].) A warrant’s validity is no longer the sole inquiry at a suppression hearing, merely a first step in the analysis. | 1 | 1985–1985 |
City of Eureka v. Armstrong
neutral
1 sentence1902(City of Eureka v. Armstrong, 83 Cal. 623 .) Appellant contends that Mrs. Gates’s claim of ownership of the street, and the fact that she was using it, and the fact that her house occupied a part of it, were sufficient notice to purchasers that her deed to Close and Gates was not intended as a dedication or offer to dedicate. | 1 | 1902–1902 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.