6 Tennessee opinions name it 1 courts 1985–2019 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Tennessee courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Teter v. Republic Parking System, Inc.green1 sentence2013Teter v. Republic Parking System, 181 S.W.3d 330, 343 (Tenn. 2005); V. | 1 | 1 |
V. L. Nicholson Co. v. Transcon Investment & Financial Ltd.green1 sentence1985Nicholson Co. v. Transcon Investment and Financial Ltd., Inc., 595 S.W.2d 474, 484 (Tenn.1980). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Tennessee. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Harmon v. Eggers
green
2 sentences1993The plaintiffs had paid more than fifty percent of the purchase price before defaulting, and the trial court held that the liquidated damages clause did not constitute an unenforceable penalty. 699 S.W.2d at 161 . 1992Noting that the purchasers’ total payments at the time of default exceeded fifty percent (50%) of the purchase price, the court refused to give effect to the liquidated damages clause in the contract, finding same to be “nothing more than or less than a forfeiture/penalty.” Id. at 164 . | 3 | 1986–1993 |
Hart v. Bordenkircher
neutral
1 sentence2019Md. 1974), aff’d, 530 F.2d 968 (4th Cir. 1975); 9 Tennessee Jurisprudence, Damages, § 29 (1983). 5 Although we agree with Air Comfort’s position that Knestrick should not be allowed to recover liquidated damages in connection with this case, we do not find favor in its specific argument that liquidated damages are unavailable due to a withdrawal of a liquidated damages claim. | 1 | 2019–2019 |
Guiliano v. Cleo, Inc.
green
1 sentence2013Guiliano v. Cleo, Inc., 995 S.W.2d at 98 . | 1 | 2013–2013 |
City of Nashville v. Nashville Traction Co.
green
1 sentence1993If a contract “contains a number of stipulations of varying degrees of importance and a single sum is made payable for any breach, applicable alike to important and unimportant covenants, it will be treated as a penalty rather than liquidated damages, no matter what name is given it by the parties.” City of Nashville v. Nashville Traction Co., 142 Tenn. 475, 480 , 220 S.W. 1087 (1920). | 1 | 1993–1993 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.