abolition doctrine (Texas) · Go Syfert
← Texas issues

abolition doctrine in Texas

6 Texas opinions name it 3 courts 1923–2023 1 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (4)

CaseFollowedCited
De Harn v. the Mexican National Ry. Co.green
tex · 1893 · cited in 2 Texas opinions naming this issue, 1990–2015
2 sentences

2015While the 1879 Texas Legislature no doubt had its strong points, it cannot be said that it was sufficiently foresighted 760 S.W.2d at 646 (emphasis supplied). [7] Knowledge to have as its objective the abolition of a doctrine that did of Petitioners' causes of action was not complete upon not exist in either name or substance until almost a century discovery of the injury (i.e., death) as the opinion suggests; later. [5] Page 361 This court examined the applicable legislative purpose many years ago in De Harn v. Mexican National Ry., 86 the element of the causative link between the use of aspi

1990While the 1879 Texas Legislature no doubt had its strong points, it cannot be said that it was sufficiently foresighted to have as its objective the abolition of a doctrine that did not exist in either name or substance until almost a century later. 5 This court examined the applicable legislative purpose many years ago in De Harn v. Mexican National Ry., 86 Tex. 68, 70 , 23 S.W. 381, 381-82 (1893): The reason of the provision is obvious.

22
Abalos v. Oil Development Co. of Texasgreen
tex · 1976 · cited in 1 Texas opinions naming this issue, 2023–2023
1 sentence

2023See Abalos, 544 S.W.2d at 632 ; Quintana, 347 S.W.3d at 452 ; see also Area Metro.

11
Willis v. Maverickgreen
tex · 1988 · cited in 1 Texas opinions naming this issue, 2015–2015
1 sentence

2015While the 1879 Texas Legislature no doubt had its strong points, it cannot be said that it was sufficiently foresighted 760 S.W.2d at 646 (emphasis supplied). [7] Knowledge to have as its objective the abolition of a doctrine that did of Petitioners' causes of action was not complete upon not exist in either name or substance until almost a century discovery of the injury (i.e., death) as the opinion suggests; later. [5] Page 361 This court examined the applicable legislative purpose many years ago in De Harn v. Mexican National Ry., 86 the element of the causative link between the use of aspi

11
Reinhart v. Younggreen
tex · 1995 · cited in 1 Texas opinions naming this issue, 1996–1996
2 sentences

1996Reinhart, 906 S.W.2d at 477 (Enoch, J., concurring); 906 S.W.2d at 477-80 (Hightower, J., dissenting).

1996Reinhart, 906 S.W.2d at 477 (Enoch, J., concurring); 906 S.W.2d at 477-80 (Hightower, J., dissenting).

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (3)

CaseCitedYears
Quintana v. CrossFit Dallas, L.L.C. green
texapp · 2011
1 sentence

2023See Abalos, 544 S.W.2d at 632 ; Quintana, 347 S.W.3d at 452 ; see also Area Metro.

12023–2023
Howle v. Camp Amon Carter green
tex · 1971
1 sentence

1973With the abolition of the doctrine of charitable immu- nity by the Supreme Court in Howle v. Camp Amon Carter, 470 S. W. 2d 629 (Tex. 1971), no reason exists why employees of a privately-owned charitable, religious, educational or other non-profit corporation, under contracts of hire, should not be covered either.as employees of a subscriber or of a non-subscriber under the Workmen’s Cornpensa- tion laws.

11973–1973
Lydman v. De Haas neutral
mich · 1915
1 sentence

1923It was not the purpose of the statute to proscribe acts on the part -of the master which, by the common law, were rightful and free from negligence, but only to eliminate an application of the principle of waiver — assumption of risk of injury by known acts of negligence on the part of the master. ‘An employer who has not elected to bring himself within the provisions of the Michigan Workmen’s Compensation Act is not answerable for injury sustained by an employé, in the absence of some negligence on the part of the former.’ Lydman v. De Haas (Mich.) 151 N. W. 718 , in 8 N. C.

11923–1923

Where else courts name it

PA 11 (1970–2005) CA 10 (1948–2009) MA 9 (1962–2019) NY 8 (1863–2010) OR 8 (1976–2019) NJ 7 (1965–2010) IL 6 (1978–2026) TX 6 (1923–2023) WI 6 (1967–2013) AL 5 (1867–1994) KS 5 (1969–1998) MO 4 (1951–1984) CO 4 (1992–2013) CT 4 (1981–2024) TN 4 (1959–1996) SC 3 (1986–2007) MS 3 (1979–1982) WA 3 (1975–1978) KY 3 (1935–1992) VA 3 (1899–1998) NM 3 (1975–2006) RI 2 (1975–2005) LA 2 (1973–2007) AZ 2 (2000–2001) FL 2 (1962–1982) GA 2 (2010–2011) MD 2 (2001–2013) MI 2 (1969–1970) IN 2 (1981–1993) OH 2 (1995–2003) HI 2 (1936–1936) NC 2 (1981–1995)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check