Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 Texas opinions name it 3 courts 1937–2022 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Carrillo v. Stategreen2 sentences1984Carrillo v. State, 591 S.W.2d 876, 886 (Tex.Cr.App. 1979); Moreno v. State, 587 S.W.2d 405, 409-410 (Tex.Cr.App. 1979); Murphy v. State, 587 S.W.2d 718, 722-723 (Tex.Cr.App. 1979); Hemphill v. State, 634 S.W.2d 78 (Tex.App.—Austin—discretionary review refused).” 1984Carrillo v. State, 591 S.W.2d 876, 886 (Tex.Cr.App. 1979); Moreno v. State, 587 S.W.2d 405, 409-410 (Tex.Cr.App. 1979); Murphy v. State, 587 S.W.2d 718, 722-723 (Tex.Cr. | 2 | 2 |
Moreno v. Stategreen2 sentences1984Carrillo v. State, 591 S.W.2d 876, 886 (Tex.Cr.App. 1979); Moreno v. State, 587 S.W.2d 405, 409-410 (Tex.Cr.App. 1979); Murphy v. State, 587 S.W.2d 718, 722-723 (Tex.Cr.App. 1979); Hemphill v. State, 634 S.W.2d 78 (Tex.App.—Austin—discretionary review refused).” 1984Carrillo v. State, 591 S.W.2d 876, 886 (Tex.Cr.App. 1979); Moreno v. State, 587 S.W.2d 405, 409-410 (Tex.Cr.App. 1979); Murphy v. State, 587 S.W.2d 718, 722-723 (Tex.Cr. | 2 | 2 |
Murphy v. Stategreen2 sentences1984Carrillo v. State, 591 S.W.2d 876, 886 (Tex.Cr.App. 1979); Moreno v. State, 587 S.W.2d 405, 409-410 (Tex.Cr.App. 1979); Murphy v. State, 587 S.W.2d 718, 722-723 (Tex.Cr.App. 1979); Hemphill v. State, 634 S.W.2d 78 (Tex.App.—Austin—discretionary review refused).” 1984Carrillo v. State, 591 S.W.2d 876, 886 (Tex.Cr.App. 1979); Moreno v. State, 587 S.W.2d 405, 409-410 (Tex.Cr.App. 1979); Murphy v. State, 587 S.W.2d 718, 722-723 (Tex.Cr. | 2 | 2 |
Marino v. Kinggreen1 sentence2022See Marino v. King, 355 S.W.3d 629, 633 (Tex. 2011) (acknowledging the lack of need for a court order). | 1 | 1 |
Miller v. Stategreen2 sentences1984See also Miller v. State, 170 Tex.Cr.R. 406 , 341 S.W.2d 440 (1960). 1984See also Miller v. State, 170 Tex.Cr.R. 406 , 341 S.W.2d 440 (1960). | 1 | 1 |
Massengale v. Stategreen2 sentences1984In Massengale v. State, 653 S.W.2d 20, 22 (Tex.Cr.App. 1983), this court wrote: “The Court of Appeals ... recognized that although under Article 38.29, supra, 'unadju-dicated criminal offenses are inadmissible for impeachment purposes,' evidence of pending charges is nevertheless admissible ‘under certain circumstances for the limited purpose of showing bias, prejudice, interest, and motive of the witness in testifying as he did.' That certainly is an accurate statement of the rule in this case. 1984The error in spelling is apparently that of the Court of Appeals. [2] In Massengale v. State, 653 S.W.2d 20, 22 (Tex. Cr.App. 1983), this court wrote: "The Court of Appeals ... recognized that although under Article 38.29, supra, `unadjudicated criminal offenses are inadmissible for impeachment purposes,' evidence of pending charges is nevertheless admissible `under certain circumstances for the limited purpose of showing bias, prejudice, interest, and motive of the witness in testifying as he did.' That certainly is an accurate statement of the rule in this case. | 1 | 1 |
Rodgers v. Kahngreen2 sentences1983Id. at 602 (emphasis added). 1983Id. at 602 (emphasis added). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Hemphill v. State
green
2 sentences1984Carrillo v. State, 591 S.W.2d 876, 886 (Tex.Cr.App. 1979); Moreno v. State, 587 S.W.2d 405, 409-410 (Tex.Cr.App. 1979); Murphy v. State, 587 S.W.2d 718, 722-723 (Tex.Cr.App. 1979); Hemphill v. State, 634 S.W.2d 78 (Tex.App.—Austin—discretionary review refused).” 1983Carrillo v. State, 591 S.W.2d 876, 886 (Tex.Cr.App.1979); Moreno v. State, 587 S.W.2d 405, 409-410 (Tex.Cr.App.1979); Murphy v. State, 587 S.W.2d 718, 722-723 (Tex.Cr.App.1979); Hemphill v. State, 634 S.W.2d 78 (Tex.App. — Austin 1982, discretionary review refused). | 2 | 1983–1984 |
Kessler v. State
green
1 sentence1984The charge given by the court is commonly known as a “synergistic charge” and it is an accurate statement of a principle established in Kessler v. State, 136 Tex. Cr.R. 340, 125 S.W.2d 308 (1938). | 1 | 1984–1984 |
Vee Bee Service Co. v. Household Finance Corp.
neutral
2 sentences1983An accurate statement of the rule was made in the cited case of Vee Bee Service Co. v. Household Finance Corp., 51 N.Y.S.2d 590 (S.Ct.1944), aff’d, 269 App.Div. 772 , 55 N.Y.S.2d 570 (1945), as follows: [W]here a borrower is required, as a condition of the loan, to assume or pay, in whole or in part, the debt of another, in addition to legal interest, the transaction is usurious, unless the borrower receives something of benefit for the additional assumption or payment, aside from the use of the money loaned. 1983An accurate statement of the rule was made in the cited case of Vee Bee Service Co. v. Household Finance Corp., 51 N.Y.S.2d 590 (S.Ct.1944), aff’d, 269 App.Div. 772 , 55 N.Y.S.2d 570 (1945), as follows: [W]here a borrower is required, as a condition of the loan, to assume or pay, in whole or in part, the debt of another, in addition to legal interest, the transaction is usurious, unless the borrower receives something of benefit for the additional assumption or payment, aside from the use of the money loaned. | 1 | 1983–1983 |
Texas Power & Light Co. v. Denson
neutral
1 sentence1937The Supreme Court of Tennessee recently referred to three Texas opinions in the following language : “Counsel for plaintiffs rely upon Texas Power & Light Co. v. Denson, 45 S. W. (2d) 1001 , Buick Automobile Co. v. Weaver, 163 S. W. 594 , and Guitar v. Wheeler, 36 S. W. (2d) 325 , being cases decided by the Texas Court of Civil Appeals. | 1 | 1937–1937 |
Buick Automobile Co. v. Weaver
green
1 sentence1937The Supreme Court of Tennessee recently referred to three Texas opinions in the following language : “Counsel for plaintiffs rely upon Texas Power & Light Co. v. Denson, 45 S. W. (2d) 1001 , Buick Automobile Co. v. Weaver, 163 S. W. 594 , and Guitar v. Wheeler, 36 S. W. (2d) 325 , being cases decided by the Texas Court of Civil Appeals. | 1 | 1937–1937 |
Guitar v. Wheeler
green
1 sentence1937The Supreme Court of Tennessee recently referred to three Texas opinions in the following language : “Counsel for plaintiffs rely upon Texas Power & Light Co. v. Denson, 45 S. W. (2d) 1001 , Buick Automobile Co. v. Weaver, 163 S. W. 594 , and Guitar v. Wheeler, 36 S. W. (2d) 325 , being cases decided by the Texas Court of Civil Appeals. | 1 | 1937–1937 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.