Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 Texas opinions name it 2 courts 1975–2024 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Cline v. Statered2 sentences2018Adjudicated error persisted in cannot make truth of that error." Cline v. State, 36 S.W. 1099, 1099 (Tex. Crim. 1975Davidson said in Cline v. State, 36 Tex.Cr.R. 320 , 36 S.W. 1099 (1896): “[Adjudicated error, persisted in, cannot make truth of that error.” Just because we have been in error in the past does not justify further error. | 1 | 2 |
ST. LUKE'S EPISCOPAL HOSPITAL v. Marksgreen1 sentence2024See De Ayala, 193 S.W.3d at 578–79. | 1 | 1 |
Madden v. Texas Board of Chiropractic Examinersgreen1 sentence2015Ramirez v. Texas State Bd. of Medical Examiners, 927 SW2d, 770, 772-73 (Tex. App.-Austin 1996); and Madden v. Bd. of Chiropractor Examiners, 663 SW2d 622, 624 (Tex. App.-Austin, 1983 writ ref. nre). 9 AUS-6044683-2 6060904/l He states absent an express statutory requirement to hold a contested case hearing, the analysis should focus on what is implied in the statute as it relates to the definition of a contested case as set forth in the APA. | 1 | 1 |
Ramirez v. Texas State Board of Medical Examinersgreen1 sentence2015Ramirez v. Texas State Bd. of Medical Examiners, 927 SW2d, 770, 772-73 (Tex. App.-Austin 1996); and Madden v. Bd. of Chiropractor Examiners, 663 SW2d 622, 624 (Tex. App.-Austin, 1983 writ ref. nre). 9 AUS-6044683-2 6060904/l He states absent an express statutory requirement to hold a contested case hearing, the analysis should focus on what is implied in the statute as it relates to the definition of a contested case as set forth in the APA. | 1 | 1 |
Farmers' Nat. Bank v. Crumleygreen1 sentence1992See Farmers' Nat'l Bank v. Crumley , 204 S.W. 358 (Tex. Civ. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Farmers State Bank of New Boston v. Bowie County
green
1 sentence1996Farmers State Bank, 95 S.W.2d at 1306 . | 1 | 1996–1996 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.