Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 Texas opinions name it 1 courts 2005–2025 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Cosio v. Stategreen1 sentence2025See id. | 1 | 1 |
Martin v. Stategreen1 sentence2020The earliest case we have located involving this asserted charge error in connection with continuous sexual abuse of a young child is Martin v. State, 335 S.W.3d 867, 873 (Tex. App.—Austin 2011, pet. ref’d). | 1 | 1 |
Times Herald Printing Co. v. A.H. Belo Corp.green1 sentence2015See Times Herald Printing Co. v. A.H. instruction that told the jury to "[c]onsider all of the facts and Bela Cmp., 820 S.W.2d 206, 214 (Tex.App.-Houston [14th circumstances surrounding the making of the agreement, the Dist.] 1991, no writ) (omission of requested instructions was interpretation placed on the agreement by the parties, and the harmless in light of separate question that applied requested conduct of the parties." The existing instruction encompassed legal standard and was answered adversely to party seeking the client's perspective ofthe fee agreement, and the trial court the ins | 1 | 1 |
Barrios v. Stategreen1 sentence2013See Barrios v. State, 283 S.W.3d 348, 350 (Tex.Crim.App.2009); Rolle, 367 S.W.3d at 757 . | 1 | 1 |
Arline v. Stategreen1 sentence2006We agree the offense alleged in Count 1 of the indictment does not include a “result of conduct” element. 9 In its brief, the State argues the objection “was not specific enough for the court to remedy the charge in a manner that would have satisfied [a]ppellant.” We need not address that argument because our disposition of appellant’s issue would be the same whether or not the asserted charge error is treated as preserved. 7 any other relevant information revealed by the record of the trial as a whole.” Id.; Arline v. State, 721 S.W.2d 348, 351-52 (Tex.Crim.App. 1986). | 1 | 1 |
Hutch v. Statered1 sentence2005See Hutch , 922 S.W.2d at 171 (citing Alman za, 686 S.W.2d at 171). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Biondi Vernard Rolle v. State
green
1 sentence2013See Barrios v. State, 283 S.W.3d 348, 350 (Tex.Crim.App.2009); Rolle, 367 S.W.3d at 757 . | 1 | 2013–2013 |
Trimble v. Itz
green
1 sentence2006In assessing harm resulting from the inclusion of improper conduct elements in the definition of culpable mental states, we “may consider the degree, if any, to which the culpable mental states were limited by the application portions of the jury charge.” Patrick, 906 S.W.2d at 492 . | 1 | 2006–2006 |