Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 Texas opinions name it 2 courts 2003–2024 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Gipson v. Stategreen2 sentences2012See Gipson, 347 S.W.3d at 897 n. 2. 2012See Gipson, 347 S.W.3d at 897 n. 2. | 2 | 2 |
Gipson, Raimond Kevongreen2 sentences2024See Cazarez v. State, 606 S.W.3d 549 , 560– 61 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2020, no pet.); Lombardo v. State, 524 S.W.3d 808, 813 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 2017, no pet.); see also Gipson v. State, 428 S.W.3d 107 , 110–11 (Tex. Crim. 2024See Cazarez v. State, 606 S.W.3d 549 , 560– 61 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2020, no pet.); Lombardo v. State, 524 S.W.3d 808, 813 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 2017, no pet.); see also Gipson v. State, 428 S.W.3d 107 , 110–11 (Tex. Crim. | 1 | 1 |
Lombardo v. Stategreen2 sentences2024See Cazarez v. State, 606 S.W.3d 549 , 560– 61 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2020, no pet.); Lombardo v. State, 524 S.W.3d 808, 813 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 2017, no pet.); see also Gipson v. State, 428 S.W.3d 107 , 110–11 (Tex. Crim. 2024See Cazarez v. State, 606 S.W.3d 549 , 560– 61 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2020, no pet.); Lombardo v. State, 524 S.W.3d 808, 813 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 2017, no pet.); see also Gipson v. State, 428 S.W.3d 107 , 110–11 (Tex. Crim. | 1 | 1 |
Gipson, Raimond Kevongreen2 sentences2013The Texas Court of Criminal Appeals has recently provided some additional guidance concerning Bearden in its case of Gipson v. State, 383 S.W.3d 152, 159 (Tex.Crim.App.2012), wherein a decision of the Beaumont Court of Appeals employed an evidentiary sufficiency examination to a Bearden inquiry. 2013The Texas Court of Criminal Appeals has recently provided some additional guidance concerning Bearden in its case of Gipson v. State, 383 S.W.3d 152, 159 (Tex.Crim.App.2012), wherein a decision of the Beaumont Court of Appeals employed an evidentiary sufficiency examination to a Bearden inquiry. | 1 | 1 |
EP Operating Co. v. MJC Energy Co.green1 sentence2003See EP Operating Co. v. MJC Energy Co. , 883 S.W.2d 263, 267 (Tex. App.—Corpus Christi 1994, writ denied); Cobb v. W. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Graylin Rusk v. State
green
1 sentence2013Waivers of constitutional rights must be voluntary, knowing, intelligent acts “ ‘done with sufficient awareness of the relevant circumstances and likely consequences.’ ” Rusk , at-, 2013 WL 503957, at *6-7 , 2013 Tex.App. | 1 | 2013–2013 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.