Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 Texas opinions name it 2 courts 2007–2018 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Slaton v. Stategreen2 sentences2008See Slaton v. State, 981 S.W.2d 208, 210 (Tex. Crim. 2008See Slaton v. State , 981 S.W.2d 208, 210 (Tex. Crim. App. 1998); Fowler v. State , 16 S.W.3d 426, 428 (Tex. App.—Waco 2000, pet. ref’d). | 2 | 2 |
Sattiewhite v. Stategreen1 sentence2018See Sattiewhite v. State, 786 S.W.2d 271 , 283–84 n.4 (Tex. Crim. | 1 | 1 |
Boyle v. Statered1 sentence2018Relying on Boyle v. State, 820 S.W.2d 122, 127 (Tex. Crim. | 1 | 1 |
Zuliani v. Stategreen1 sentence2012See Zuliani, 97 S.W.3d at 594-95 ; Saxton, 804 S.W.2d at 913-14 . | 1 | 1 |
Fowler v. Stategreen1 sentence2008See Slaton v. State , 981 S.W.2d 208, 210 (Tex. Crim. App. 1998); Fowler v. State , 16 S.W.3d 426, 428 (Tex. App.—Waco 2000, pet. ref’d). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Foster v. Neal
green
1 sentence2018App. 2000), cert. denied, 532 U.S. 944 (2001). 22 Even though the prosecutor’s comment did not directly impugn defense counsel but rather was more akin to a comment regarding Blue’s non-testimonial, courtroom demeanor—and largely because the trial court sustained the objection— we will assume that the prosecutor’s remark was an attempt by the prosecutor to strike at Blue over defense counsel’s shoulder or that at least the trial court understood the nature of Blue’s objection. | 1 | 2018–2018 |
Ex Parte Blue
green
2 sentences2015This Court went on to explain that the “language of Article 11.071, Section 5(a)(3) is broad enough on its face to accommodate an absolute constitutional prohibition against, as well as statutory ineligibility for, the death penalty.” Id. at 161 . 2015This Court held that, despite the availability of Blue’s claim when he filed his initial application: through Article 11.071, Section 5(a)(3), the Legislature has provided a mechanism whereby a subsequent habeas applicant may proceed with an Atkins claim if he is able to demonstrate to this Court that there is evidence that could reasonably show, to a level of confidence by clear and convincing evidence, that no rational finder of fact would fail to find he is mentally retarded. 5 Id. at 154 . | 1 | 2015–2015 |
Saxton v. State
green
1 sentence2012See Zuliani, 97 S.W.3d at 594-95 ; Saxton, 804 S.W.2d at 913-14 . | 1 | 2012–2012 |
Penry v. Lynaugh
red
2 sentences2007PROC. art. 11.071, § 5(a)(3). [4] Id. [5] 851 S.W.2d 275 (Tex.Crim.App.1993). [6] Id. at 279-280. [7] Penry v. Lynaugh, 492 U.S. 302, 329-330 , 109 S.Ct. 2934 , 106 L.Ed.2d 256 (1989). 2007PROC. art. 11.071, § 5(a)(3). [4] Id. [5] 851 S.W.2d 275 (Tex.Crim.App.1993). [6] Id. at 279-280. [7] Penry v. Lynaugh, 492 U.S. 302, 329-330 , 109 S.Ct. 2934 , 106 L.Ed.2d 256 (1989). | 1 | 2007–2007 |
Blue v. State
green
1 sentence2007Id. at 132 . | 1 | 2007–2007 |
Marin v. State
red
1 sentence2007PROC. art. 11.071, § 5(a)(3). [4] Id. [5] 851 S.W.2d 275 (Tex.Crim.App.1993). [6] Id. at 279-280. [7] Penry v. Lynaugh, 492 U.S. 302, 329-330 , 109 S.Ct. 2934 , 106 L.Ed.2d 256 (1989). | 1 | 2007–2007 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.