called res gestae rule (Texas) · Go Syfert
← Texas issues

called res gestae rule in Texas

6 Texas opinions name it 1 courts 1966–1971 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (2)

CaseFollowedCited
Kerrigan v. Stategreen
texcrimapp · 1959 · cited in 4 Texas opinions naming this issue, 1967–1971
2 sentences

1971See Kerrigan v. State [167 Tex. Cr.R. 601], 321 S.W.2d 884 , and cases cited.” In 4 Branch’s Ann.P.C.2d Ed., Sec. 2255, page 618, it is written: “* * * where the offense is one continuous transaction, or another offense is a part of the case on trial or blended or closely interwoven therewith, proof of all the facts is proper.” See also 23 Tex.Jur.2d 302, Sec. 196; Walker v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 454 S.W.2d 415 ; Jefferson v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 452 S.W.2d 462 ; Taylor v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 420 S.W.2d 601 ; Blankenship v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 448 S.W.2d 476 .

1971Kerrigan v. State, 167 Tex.Cr.R. 601 , 321 S.W.2d 884 and cases cited.” See also Walker v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 454 S.W.2d 415 ; Jefferson v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 452 S.W.2d 462 .

14
Mitchell v. Stategreen
texcrimapp · 1951 · cited in 1 Texas opinions naming this issue, 1969–1969
1 sentence

1969See Mitchell v. State, 156 Tex. Cr.R. 128, 239 S.W.2d 384 ; Smith v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 397 S.W.2d 70 , cert, denied, 384 U.S. 1024 , 86 S.Ct. 1965 , 16 L.Ed.2d 1028 .

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (7)

CaseCitedYears
Jefferson v. State neutral
texcrimapp · 1970
2 sentences

1971See Kerrigan v. State [167 Tex. Cr.R. 601], 321 S.W.2d 884 , and cases cited.” In 4 Branch’s Ann.P.C.2d Ed., Sec. 2255, page 618, it is written: “* * * where the offense is one continuous transaction, or another offense is a part of the case on trial or blended or closely interwoven therewith, proof of all the facts is proper.” See also 23 Tex.Jur.2d 302, Sec. 196; Walker v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 454 S.W.2d 415 ; Jefferson v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 452 S.W.2d 462 ; Taylor v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 420 S.W.2d 601 ; Blankenship v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 448 S.W.2d 476 .

1971Kerrigan v. State, 167 Tex.Cr.R. 601 , 321 S.W.2d 884 and cases cited.” See also Walker v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 454 S.W.2d 415 ; Jefferson v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 452 S.W.2d 462 .

31971–1971
Walker v. State green
texcrimapp · 1970
2 sentences

1971See Kerrigan v. State [167 Tex. Cr.R. 601], 321 S.W.2d 884 , and cases cited.” In 4 Branch’s Ann.P.C.2d Ed., Sec. 2255, page 618, it is written: “* * * where the offense is one continuous transaction, or another offense is a part of the case on trial or blended or closely interwoven therewith, proof of all the facts is proper.” See also 23 Tex.Jur.2d 302, Sec. 196; Walker v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 454 S.W.2d 415 ; Jefferson v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 452 S.W.2d 462 ; Taylor v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 420 S.W.2d 601 ; Blankenship v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 448 S.W.2d 476 .

1971Kerrigan v. State, 167 Tex.Cr.R. 601 , 321 S.W.2d 884 and cases cited.” See also Walker v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 454 S.W.2d 415 ; Jefferson v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 452 S.W.2d 462 .

31971–1971
Blankenship v. State green
texcrimapp · 1969
1 sentence

1971See Kerrigan v. State [167 Tex. Cr.R. 601], 321 S.W.2d 884 , and cases cited.” In 4 Branch’s Ann.P.C.2d Ed., Sec. 2255, page 618, it is written: “* * * where the offense is one continuous transaction, or another offense is a part of the case on trial or blended or closely interwoven therewith, proof of all the facts is proper.” See also 23 Tex.Jur.2d 302, Sec. 196; Walker v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 454 S.W.2d 415 ; Jefferson v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 452 S.W.2d 462 ; Taylor v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 420 S.W.2d 601 ; Blankenship v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 448 S.W.2d 476 .

11971–1971
Taylor v. State green
texcrimapp · 1967
1 sentence

1971See Kerrigan v. State [167 Tex. Cr.R. 601], 321 S.W.2d 884 , and cases cited.” In 4 Branch’s Ann.P.C.2d Ed., Sec. 2255, page 618, it is written: “* * * where the offense is one continuous transaction, or another offense is a part of the case on trial or blended or closely interwoven therewith, proof of all the facts is proper.” See also 23 Tex.Jur.2d 302, Sec. 196; Walker v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 454 S.W.2d 415 ; Jefferson v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 452 S.W.2d 462 ; Taylor v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 420 S.W.2d 601 ; Blankenship v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 448 S.W.2d 476 .

11971–1971
Smith v. State neutral
texcrimapp · 1965
1 sentence

1969See Mitchell v. State, 156 Tex. Cr.R. 128, 239 S.W.2d 384 ; Smith v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 397 S.W.2d 70 , cert, denied, 384 U.S. 1024 , 86 S.Ct. 1965 , 16 L.Ed.2d 1028 .

11969–1969
Smith v. Texas neutral
scotus · 1966
1 sentence

1969See Mitchell v. State, 156 Tex. Cr.R. 128, 239 S.W.2d 384 ; Smith v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 397 S.W.2d 70 , cert, denied, 384 U.S. 1024 , 86 S.Ct. 1965 , 16 L.Ed.2d 1028 .

11969–1969
Nichols v. State neutral
texcrimapp · 1964
1 sentence

1966Nichols v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 386 S.W.2d 795 ; Converse v. State, Tex.Cr.

11966–1966

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check