Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 Texas opinions name it 1 courts 2016–2022 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Johnson v. Davisgreen2 sentences2018Johnson v. Davis, 178 S.W.3d 230, 240 (Tex. App.— Houston [14th Dist.] 2005, pet. denied) (citing Moore’s Inc. v. Garcia, 604 S.W.2d 261, 264 (Tex. Civ. 2016See Johnson v. Davis, 178 S.W.3d 230, 240 (Tex.App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 2005, pet’, denied) (“To establish a prima facie claim for civil assault, the plaintiff must establish the same elements required for criminal assault.”),- However, a civil assault claim is still a “tort”; it is called “an intentional tort.” City of Watauga v. Gordon, 434 S.W.3d 586, 588-94 (Tex.2014) (explaining that because the Texas Tort Claims Act does not waive governmental immunity for intentional torts and because claims for civil assault and battery are intentional torts, governmental immunity is not waived and su | 2 | 2 |
Price v. Shortgreen1 sentence2022See Gibbins v. Berlin, 162 S.W.3d 335, 340 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 2005, no pet.) (citing Price v. Short, 931 S.W.2d 677, 687 (Tex. App.—Dallas 1996, no writ)). | 1 | 1 |
Gibbins v. Berlingreen1 sentence2022See Gibbins v. Berlin, 162 S.W.3d 335, 340 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 2005, no pet.) (citing Price v. Short, 931 S.W.2d 677, 687 (Tex. App.—Dallas 1996, no writ)). | 1 | 1 |
Osterberg v. Pecagreen1 sentence2021See Osterberg v Peca, 12 S.W.3d 31, 55 (Tex. 2000). | 1 | 1 |
Foye v. Montesgreen1 sentence2020See Foye, 9 S.W.3d at 441 ; Tex. Penal Code § 22.01(a)(3). | 1 | 1 |
DeLeon v. Hernandezgreen1 sentence2020See DeLeon v Hernandez, 814 S.W.2d 531, 533 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 1991, no writ) (summary judgment in favor of person sued for civil assault erroneous when record contains evidence he hit his wife in the face causing physical pain). | 1 | 1 |
Moore's, Inc. v. Garciagreen1 sentence2018Johnson v. Davis, 178 S.W.3d 230, 240 (Tex. App.— Houston [14th Dist.] 2005, pet. denied) (citing Moore’s Inc. v. Garcia, 604 S.W.2d 261, 264 (Tex. Civ. | 1 | 1 |
the City of Watauga v. Russell Gordongreen2 sentences2016See Johnson v. Davis, 178 S.W.3d 230, 240 (Tex.App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 2005, pet’, denied) (“To establish a prima facie claim for civil assault, the plaintiff must establish the same elements required for criminal assault.”),- However, a civil assault claim is still a “tort”; it is called “an intentional tort.” City of Watauga v. Gordon, 434 S.W.3d 586, 588-94 (Tex.2014) (explaining that because the Texas Tort Claims Act does not waive governmental immunity for intentional torts and because claims for civil assault and battery are intentional torts, governmental immunity is not waived and su 2016See Johnson v. Davis, 178 S.W.3d 230, 240 (Tex.App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 2005, pet’, denied) (“To establish a prima facie claim for civil assault, the plaintiff must establish the same elements required for criminal assault.”),- However, a civil assault claim is still a “tort”; it is called “an intentional tort.” City of Watauga v. Gordon, 434 S.W.3d 586, 588-94 (Tex.2014) (explaining that because the Texas Tort Claims Act does not waive governmental immunity for intentional torts and because claims for civil assault and battery are intentional torts, governmental immunity is not waived and su | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.