dictates rule (Texas) · Go Syfert
← Texas issues

dictates rule in Texas

6 Texas opinions name it 1 courts 1995–2023 1 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (3)

CaseFollowedCited
Belcher v. Stategreen
texapp · 2015 · cited in 1 Texas opinions naming this issue, 2017–2017
1 sentence

2017See Belcher v. State, 474 S.W.3d 840, 847 (Tex. App.—Tyler 2015, no pet.); Sanders v. State, 255 S.W.3d 754, 760 (Tex. App.— Fort Worth 2008, pet. ref’d).

11
Sanders v. Stategreen
texapp · 2008 · cited in 1 Texas opinions naming this issue, 2017–2017
1 sentence

2017See Belcher v. State, 474 S.W.3d 840, 847 (Tex. App.—Tyler 2015, no pet.); Sanders v. State, 255 S.W.3d 754, 760 (Tex. App.— Fort Worth 2008, pet. ref’d).

11
Walker v. Packergreen
tex · 1992 · cited in 1 Texas opinions naming this issue, 1999–1999
1 sentence

1999See Walker v. Packer, 827 S.W.2d 833, 839 (Tex.1992) (mandamus issues to correct a clear abuse of discretion or the violation of a duty imposed by law).

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (4)

CaseCitedYears
Miranda v. Arizona green
scotus · 1966
2 sentences

2023If a person invokes his Fifth Amendment right, “at any time prior to or during questioning,” “the interrogation must cease until an attorney is present.” Id. at 473– 74. “[A]ny statement taken after the person invokes his privilege cannot be other than the product of compulsion, subtle or otherwise.” Id. at 474 .

2023The Court described the right to counsel under such circumstance as “the adequate protective device necessary to make the process of police interrogation conform to the dictates of the privilege” and to “[e]nsure that statements made in the government- established atmosphere are not the product of compulsion.” Id. at 466 .

12023–2023
Donald Ray Wells v. State green
texapp · 2017
1 sentence

2019Wells, 558 S.W.3d at 669 .

12019–2019
State Department of Highways & Public Transportation v. Payne green
tex · 1992
2 sentences

1995In Payne , the supreme court stated that it is not revising the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure by opinion, 838 S.W.2d at 241 , and its holding neither revises nor violates the dictates of rule 278.

1995In Payne , the supreme court stated that it is *118 not revising the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure by opinion, 838 S.W.2d at 241 , and its holding neither revises nor violates the dictates of rule 278.

11995–1995
Moreno v. State green
texapp · 1993
1 sentence

1995Id.

11995–1995

Where else courts name it

OH 11 (1999–2022) FL 11 (1976–2018) TX 6 (1995–2023) NM 5 (1994–2014) UT 5 (2003–2025) WA 4 (1988–2015) MI 4 (1994–2018) AK 3 (1979–1996) TN 3 (1980–2012) PA 3 (1979–2021) MD 3 (1976–2011) NY 3 (2004–2013) MA 2 (2010–2011) GA 2 (1985–1991) IL 2 (2003–2025) IN 2 (1987–2016) CO 2 (1990–2012)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check