facts is fundamental error (Texas) · Go Syfert
← Texas issues

facts is fundamental error in Texas

6 Texas opinions name it 2 courts 1982–1991 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (1)

CaseFollowedCited
Sandstrom v. Montanagreen
scotus · 1979 · cited in 1 Texas opinions naming this issue, 1983–1983
2 sentences

1983See also Sandstrom v. Montana, 442 U.S. 510, 524 , 99 S.Ct. 2450, 2459 , 61 L.Ed.2d 39 (1979); Mullaney v. Wilbur, 421 U.S. 684, 704 , 95 S.Ct. 1881, 1892 , 44 L.Edi2d 508 (1975) (where the Supreme Court held that “the due process clause requires the prosecution to prove beyond a reasonable doubt the absence of the heat of passion on sudden provocation when the issue is properly presented in a homicide case”).

1983See also Sandstrom v. Montana, 442 U.S. 510, 524 , 99 S.Ct. 2450, 2459 , 61 L.Ed.2d 39 (1979); Mullaney v. Wilbur, 421 U.S. 684, 704 , 95 S.Ct. 1881, 1892 , 44 L.Edi2d 508 (1975) (where the Supreme Court held that “the due process clause requires the prosecution to prove beyond a reasonable doubt the absence of the heat of passion on sudden provocation when the issue is properly presented in a homicide case”).

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (7)

CaseCitedYears
West v. State green
texcrimapp · 1978
2 sentences

1984Cumbie v. State, supra; West v. State, 567 S.W.2d 515 (Tex.Cr.App.1978); Messenger v. State, 638 S.W.2d 883 (Tex.Cr.App.1982).

1982Cumbie v. State, 578 S.W.2d 732 (Tex.Cr.App.1978); West v. State, 567 S.W.2d 515 (Tex.Cr.App.1978).

21982–1984
Doyle v. State green
texcrimapp · 1982
2 sentences

1984He cites Doyle v. State, 631 S.W.2d 732 (Tex.Cr.App.1982) for the proposition that the failure to include an essential element of the offense of the charge applying the law to the facts is fundamental error.

1983Doyle v. State, 631 S.W.2d 732 (Tex.Cr.App.1980).

21983–1984
Almanza v. State red
texcrimapp · 1985
1 sentence

1991The holding in Selman , however, was decided before the Court of Criminal Appeals delivered its opinion in Almanza v. State, 686 S.W.2d 157 (Tex.Crim.App.1984).

11991–1991
Selman v. State green
texcrimapp · 1984
2 sentences

1991Appellant cites as authority Selman v. State, 663 S.W.2d 838 (Tex.Crim.App.1984), which held that “[t]he failure to include an essential element of the offense in the charge applying the law to the facts is fundamental error.” Id. at 840 .

1991Appellant cites as authority Selman v. State, 663 S.W.2d 838 (Tex.Crim.App.1984), which held that “[t]he failure to include an essential element of the offense in the charge applying the law to the facts is fundamental error.” Id. at 840 .

11991–1991
Messenger v. State green
texcrimapp · 1982
1 sentence

1984Cumbie v. State, supra; West v. State, 567 S.W.2d 515 (Tex.Cr.App.1978); Messenger v. State, 638 S.W.2d 883 (Tex.Cr.App.1982).

11984–1984
Mullaney v. Wilbur green
scotus · 1975
2 sentences

1983See also Sandstrom v. Montana, 442 U.S. 510, 524 , 99 S.Ct. 2450, 2459 , 61 L.Ed.2d 39 (1979); Mullaney v. Wilbur, 421 U.S. 684, 704 , 95 S.Ct. 1881, 1892 , 44 L.Edi2d 508 (1975) (where the Supreme Court held that “the due process clause requires the prosecution to prove beyond a reasonable doubt the absence of the heat of passion on sudden provocation when the issue is properly presented in a homicide case”).

1983See also Sandstrom v. Montana, 442 U.S. 510, 524 , 99 S.Ct. 2450, 2459 , 61 L.Ed.2d 39 (1979); Mullaney v. Wilbur, 421 U.S. 684, 704 , 95 S.Ct. 1881, 1892 , 44 L.Edi2d 508 (1975) (where the Supreme Court held that “the due process clause requires the prosecution to prove beyond a reasonable doubt the absence of the heat of passion on sudden provocation when the issue is properly presented in a homicide case”).

11983–1983
Cumbie v. State red
texcrimapp · 1979
2 sentences

1982Cumbie v. State, 578 S.W.2d 732 (Tex.Cr.App.1978); West v. State, 567 S.W.2d 515 (Tex.Cr.App.1978).

1982Cumbie v. State, 578 S.W.2d 732 (Tex.Cr.App.1978); West v. State, 567 S.W.2d 515 (Tex.Cr.App.1978).

11982–1982

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check