Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 Texas opinions name it 1 courts 2001–2021 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Ortiz v. Stategreen2 sentences2006Amador fails to meet his burden "to ensure that the record on appeal is sufficient to resolve the issue he presents." The Fourteenth Court of Appeals reached a similar conclusion in Ortiz v. State , 144 S.W.3d 225, 230 (Tex. App. - Houston [14th Dist.] 2004, pet. ref'd), and placed the burden on the party appealing "to develop the record to show the nature and source of an error and, in some cases, its prejudice to him." As previously noted, the trial court did not file findings of fact. 2006Amador fails to meet his burden "to ensure that the record on appeal is sufficient to resolve the issue he presents." The Fourteenth Court of Appeals reached a similar conclusion in Ortiz v. State , 144 S.W.3d 225, 230 (Tex. App. - Houston [14th Dist.] 2004, pet. ref'd), and placed the burden on the party appealing "to develop the record to show the nature and source of an error and, in some cases, its prejudice to him." As previously noted, the trial court did not file findings of fact. | 2 | 2 |
Argo Data Resource Corp. v. Shagrithayagreen1 sentence2018See Argo Data Res., 380 S.W.3d at 266 (“To the extent Shagrithaya expected, however, to maintain a level of compensation equal to Martin’s indefinitely regardless of circumstances or his position in the company, we conclude that, without an agreement pertaining to compensation, such an expectation was not reasonable.”); see also Montgomery Cty. | 1 | 1 |
Celotex Corp. v. Tategreen1 sentence2010See Celotex Corp. v. Tate, 797 S.W.2d 197, 206 (Tex. App.–Corpus Christi 1990, writ dism’d by agr.); see also Speier v. Webster College, 616 S.W.2d 617, 619 (Tex. 1981). | 1 | 1 |
Speier v. Webster Collegegreen1 sentence2010See Celotex Corp. v. Tate, 797 S.W.2d 197, 206 (Tex. App.–Corpus Christi 1990, writ dism’d by agr.); see also Speier v. Webster College, 616 S.W.2d 617, 619 (Tex. 1981). | 1 | 1 |
Zuniga v. Zunigagreen1 sentence2001See id. at 802 . | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Cantu v. State
green
1 sentence2021We balance the Barker factors with “common sense 9 and sensitivity to ensure that charges are dismissed only when the evidence shows that a defendant’s actual and asserted interest in a speedy trial has been infringed.” Cantu, 253 S.W.3d at 281 . | 1 | 2021–2021 |