6 Texas opinions name it 2 courts 1991–2020 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
United States v. Tateogreen2 sentences1995The justification for this rule was explained in United States v. Tateo , 377 U.S. 463, 466 , 12 L.Ed.2d 448 , 84 S. Ct. 1587 (1964), as follows: While different theories have been advanced to support the permissibility of retrial, of greater importance than the conceptual abstractions employed to explain the Ball principle are the implications of that principle for the sound administration of justice. 1995The justification for this rule was explained in United States v. Tateo , 377 U.S. 463, 466 , 12 L.Ed.2d 448 , 84 S. Ct. 1587 (1964), as follows: While different theories have been advanced to support the permissibility of retrial, of greater importance than the conceptual abstractions employed to explain the Ball principle are the implications of that principle for the sound administration of justice. | 1 | 4 |
Snowden, Rion Phealgreen1 sentence2020See Snowden v. State, 353 S.W.3d 815, 822 (Tex. Crim. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Holmberg v. State
green
1 sentence1997The First Court of Appeals has rejected this analysis stating that “the key to the application of collateral estoppel provided in Neaves was not dependent on the procedure, but rather on the basis that ‘the issue[s] of ultimate fact are, nevertheless, different’ between the two proceedings.” Holmberg, 931 S.W.2d at 4 . | 1 | 1997–1997 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.