Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 Texas opinions name it 3 courts 1983–2015 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Kelly v. Stategreen2 sentences2002See Kelly v. State, 824 S.W.2d 568 (Tex. Crim. 2002See Kelly v. State , 824 S.W.2d 568 (Tex. Crim. | 2 | 2 |
State ex rel. Ellenwoodgreen1 sentence1984Indeed, in Ellenwood this Court stated that “the purposes of the Mental Health Code should not be defeated by a strict insistence on a hearing within fourteen days.” Id. at 253. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Alford v. United States
green
1 sentence2015In Alford v. United States, 282 U.S. 687 , the Court unanimously reversed a federal conviction because the trial judge had sustained objections to questions by the defense seeking to elicit the “place of residence” of a prosecution witness over the insistence of defense counsel that “the jury was entitled to know ‘who the witness is, where he lives and what his business is.’” What the Court said in reversing that conviction is fully applicable here: It is the essence of a fair trial that reasonable latitude be given the cross-examiner, even though he is unable to state to the court what facts | 1 | 2015–2015 |
Boyd v. Dutton
green
2 sentences1994Boyd v. Dutton, 405 U.S. 1, 3 , 92 S.Ct. 759, 760-61 , 30 L.Ed.2d 755 (1972). 1994Boyd v. Dutton, 405 U.S. 1, 3 , 92 S.Ct. 759, 760-61 , 30 L.Ed.2d 755 (1972). | 1 | 1994–1994 |
Miranda v. Arizona
green
2 sentences1983Concerning circumstances similar to those now before us, the Miranda Court spoke as follows: “If the interrogation continues without the presence of an attorney and a statement is taken, a heavy burden rests on the government to demonstrate that the defendant knowingly and intelligently waived his privilege against self-incrimination and his right to retained or appointed counsel.” *778 Supra, 384 U.S. at 475 , 86 S.Ct. at 1628 . 1983Concerning circumstances similar to those now before us, the Miranda Court spoke as follows: “If the interrogation continues without the presence of an attorney and a statement is taken, a heavy burden rests on the government to demonstrate that the defendant knowingly and intelligently waived his privilege against self-incrimination and his right to retained or appointed counsel.” *778 Supra, 384 U.S. at 475 , 86 S.Ct. at 1628 . | 1 | 1983–1983 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.