Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 Texas opinions name it 1 courts 2006–2008 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Cole v. Stategreen2 sentences2008However, this Court has held, "Even if a prosecutor's statements are intended as a rebuttal, the legitimate arguments of defense counsel cannot serve as a basis for permitting prosecutorial comments that "cast aspersion on defense counsel's veracity with the jury." Id. (quoting Mosely v. State , 983 S.W.2d 249, 259 (Tex. Crim. 2008Even if a prosecutor's statements are intended as a rebuttal, the legitimate arguments of defense counsel cannot serve as a basis for permitting prosecutorial comments that "cast aspersion on defense counsel's veracity with the jury." Cole v. State , 194 S.W.3d 538, 544 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2006, pet. ref’d) (quoting Dinkins , 894 S.W.2d at 357). | 3 | 4 |
Dinkins v. Stategreen2 sentences2008Even if a prosecutor’s statements are intended as a rebuttal, the legitimate arguments of defense counsel cannot serve as a basis for permitting prosecutorial comments that “cast aspersion on defense counsel’s veracity with the jury.” Cole v. State, 194 S.W.3d 538, 544 (Tex.App.-Houston [1st Dist.] 2006, pet. refd) (quoting Dinkins, 894 S.W.2d at 357 ). 2008Even if a prosecutor's statements are intended as a rebuttal, the legitimate arguments of defense counsel cannot serve as a basis for permitting prosecutorial comments that "cast aspersion on defense counsel's veracity with the jury." Cole v. State , 194 S.W.3d 538, 544 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2006, pet. ref’d) (quoting Dinkins , 894 S.W.2d at 357). | 1 | 5 |
Mosley v. Stategreen2 sentences2008However, this Court has held, "Even if a prosecutor's statements are intended as a rebuttal, the legitimate arguments of defense counsel cannot serve as a basis for permitting prosecutorial comments that "cast aspersion on defense counsel's veracity with the jury." Id. (quoting Mosely v. State , 983 S.W.2d 249, 259 (Tex. Crim. 2006Even if a prosecutor’s statements are intended as a rebuttal, the legitimate arguments of defense counsel cannot serve as a basis for permitting prosecutorial comments that “cast aspersion on defense counsel’s veracity with the jury.” Id. (quoting Dinkins , 894 S.W.2d at 357 ) 1. | 1 | 3 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||