lex loci delicti rule (Texas) · Go Syfert
← Texas issues

lex loci delicti rule in Texas

6 Texas opinions name it 2 courts 1979–2009 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (7)

CaseFollowedCited
Click v. Thuron Industries, Inc.green
tex · 1972 · cited in 1 Texas opinions naming this issue, 1979–1979
1 sentence

1979The case asserted must stand or fall upon that law.” One year later the statute was again construed as a codification of the lex loci delicti rule in El Paso & Juarez Traction Co. v. Carruth, 255 S.W. 159, 159 (Tex.Com.App. 1923, jdgmt. adopted): “This statute merely declared what had theretofore been the universal rule, that the lex loci delictus must determine the nature of the cause of action, and the extent of the recovery, while the forms of remedies and the mode of pursuing same are determined by the law of the forum.” More recently, this court wrote in Francis v. Herrin Transportation C

11
Withers v. Stimmelgreen
texapp · 1962 · cited in 1 Texas opinions naming this issue, 1979–1979
1 sentence

1979Withers v. Stimmel, 363 S.W.2d 144, 148 (Tex.Civ.App.—Dallas 1962, writ ref’d n. r. e.); Carter v. Tillery, 257 S.W.2d 465, 466-67 (Tex.Civ.App.—Amarillo 1953, writ ref’d n. r. e.); Grandstaff v. Mercer, 214 S.W.2d 133, 134-35 (Tex.Civ.App.—Fort Worth 1948, writ ref’d n. r. e.).

11
Francis v. Herrin Transportation Companygreen
tex · 1968 · cited in 1 Texas opinions naming this issue, 1979–1979
1 sentence

1979The case asserted must stand or fall upon that law.” One year later the statute was again construed as a codification of the lex loci delicti rule in El Paso & Juarez Traction Co. v. Carruth, 255 S.W. 159, 159 (Tex.Com.App. 1923, jdgmt. adopted): “This statute merely declared what had theretofore been the universal rule, that the lex loci delictus must determine the nature of the cause of action, and the extent of the recovery, while the forms of remedies and the mode of pursuing same are determined by the law of the forum.” More recently, this court wrote in Francis v. Herrin Transportation C

11
El Paso & Juarez Traction Co. v. Carruthgreen
texcommnapp · 1923 · cited in 1 Texas opinions naming this issue, 1979–1979
1 sentence

1979The case asserted must stand or fall upon that law.” One year later the statute was again construed as a codification of the lex loci delicti rule in El Paso & Juarez Traction Co. v. Carruth, 255 S.W. 159, 159 (Tex.Com.App. 1923, jdgmt. adopted): “This statute merely declared what had theretofore been the universal rule, that the lex loci delictus must determine the nature of the cause of action, and the extent of the recovery, while the forms of remedies and the mode of pursuing same are determined by the law of the forum.” More recently, this court wrote in Francis v. Herrin Transportation C

11
Amador Ramirez, Jr., Individually, as Administrator of the Estate of Ana Maria S. De Ramirez, Deceased v. Autobuses Blancos Flecha Roja, S.A. De C.V.green
ca5 · 1973 · cited in 1 Texas opinions naming this issue, 1979–1979
1 sentence

1979Ramirez v. Autobuses Blancos Flecha Roja, S.A. de C.V., 486 F.2d 493, 497 (5th Cir. 1973).

11
Grandstaff v. Mercergreen
texapp · 1948 · cited in 1 Texas opinions naming this issue, 1979–1979
1 sentence

1979Withers v. Stimmel, 363 S.W.2d 144, 148 (Tex.Civ.App.—Dallas 1962, writ ref’d n. r. e.); Carter v. Tillery, 257 S.W.2d 465, 466-67 (Tex.Civ.App.—Amarillo 1953, writ ref’d n. r. e.); Grandstaff v. Mercer, 214 S.W.2d 133, 134-35 (Tex.Civ.App.—Fort Worth 1948, writ ref’d n. r. e.).

11
Carter v. Tillerygreen
texapp · 1953 · cited in 1 Texas opinions naming this issue, 1979–1979
11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (31)

CaseCitedYears
Gutierrez v. Collins green
tex · 1979
2 sentences

1982In Gutierrez v. Collins, 583 S.W.2d 312 (Tex.1979), the Supreme Court adopted the “most significant relationship” test of § 145 to replace the lex loci delicti rule that had previously obtained in Texas.

1980Prior to our decision in Gutierrez v. Collins, 583 S.W.2d 312 (Tex.1979), the common law rule in tort cases in Texas was the doctrine of lex loci delicti, which meant that the law of the place where the cause of action arose must prevail.

51979–2009
Griffith v. United Air Lines, Inc. green
pa · 1964
2 sentences

1979Armstrong v. Armstrong, 441 P.2d 699 (Alaska 1968) (governmental interests test); Schwartz v. Schwartz, 103 Ariz. 562 , 447 P.2d 254 (1968) (Restatement); Wallis v. Mrs. Smith’s Pie Co., 261 Ark. 622 , 550 S.W.2d 453 (1977) (Leflar); Reich v. Purcell, 67 Cal.2d 551 , 63 Cal.Rptr. 31 , 432 P.2d 727 (1967) (governmental interests); First National Bank in Fort Collins v. Rostek, 182 Colo. 437 , 514 P.2d 314 (1973) (Restatement); Gaither v. Myers, 131 U.S.App.D.C. 216 , 404 F.2d 216 (1968) (governmental interests); Ingersoll v. Klein, 46 I11.2d 42, 262 N.E.2d 593 (1970) (Restatement); Fuerste v. B

1979Armstrong v. Armstrong, 441 P.2d 699 (Alaska 1968) (governmental interests test); Schwartz v. Schwartz, 103 Ariz. 562 , 447 P.2d 254 (1968) (Restatement); Wallis v. Mrs. Smith’s Pie Co., 261 Ark. 622 , 550 S.W.2d 453 (1977) (Leflar); Reich v. Purcell, 67 Cal.2d 551 , 63 Cal.Rptr. 31 , 432 P.2d 727 (1967) (governmental interests); First National Bank in Fort Collins v. Rostek, 182 Colo. 437 , 514 P.2d 314 (1973) (Restatement); Gaither v. Myers, 131 U.S.App.D.C. 216 , 404 F.2d 216 (1968) (governmental interests); Ingersoll v. Klein, 46 I11.2d 42, 262 N.E.2d 593 (1970) (Restatement); Fuerste v. B

11979–1979
Issendorf v. Olson green
nd · 1972
1 sentence

1979Armstrong v. Armstrong, 441 P.2d 699 (Alaska 1968) (governmental interests test); Schwartz v. Schwartz, 103 Ariz. 562 , 447 P.2d 254 (1968) (Restatement); Wallis v. Mrs. Smith’s Pie Co., 261 Ark. 622 , 550 S.W.2d 453 (1977) (Leflar); Reich v. Purcell, 67 Cal.2d 551 , 63 Cal.Rptr. 31 , 432 P.2d 727 (1967) (governmental interests); First National Bank in Fort Collins v. Rostek, 182 Colo. 437 , 514 P.2d 314 (1973) (Restatement); Gaither v. Myers, 131 U.S.App.D.C. 216 , 404 F.2d 216 (1968) (governmental interests); Ingersoll v. Klein, 46 I11.2d 42, 262 N.E.2d 593 (1970) (Restatement); Fuerste v. B

11979–1979
Clark v. Clark green
nh · 1966
2 sentences

1979Armstrong v. Armstrong, 441 P.2d 699 (Alaska 1968) (governmental interests test); Schwartz v. Schwartz, 103 Ariz. 562 , 447 P.2d 254 (1968) (Restatement); Wallis v. Mrs. Smith’s Pie Co., 261 Ark. 622 , 550 S.W.2d 453 (1977) (Leflar); Reich v. Purcell, 67 Cal.2d 551 , 63 Cal.Rptr. 31 , 432 P.2d 727 (1967) (governmental interests); First National Bank in Fort Collins v. Rostek, 182 Colo. 437 , 514 P.2d 314 (1973) (Restatement); Gaither v. Myers, 131 U.S.App.D.C. 216 , 404 F.2d 216 (1968) (governmental interests); Ingersoll v. Klein, 46 I11.2d 42, 262 N.E.2d 593 (1970) (Restatement); Fuerste v. B

1979Armstrong v. Armstrong, 441 P.2d 699 (Alaska 1968) (governmental interests test); Schwartz v. Schwartz, 103 Ariz. 562 , 447 P.2d 254 (1968) (Restatement); Wallis v. Mrs. Smith’s Pie Co., 261 Ark. 622 , 550 S.W.2d 453 (1977) (Leflar); Reich v. Purcell, 67 Cal.2d 551 , 63 Cal.Rptr. 31 , 432 P.2d 727 (1967) (governmental interests); First National Bank in Fort Collins v. Rostek, 182 Colo. 437 , 514 P.2d 314 (1973) (Restatement); Gaither v. Myers, 131 U.S.App.D.C. 216 , 404 F.2d 216 (1968) (governmental interests); Ingersoll v. Klein, 46 I11.2d 42, 262 N.E.2d 593 (1970) (Restatement); Fuerste v. B

11979–1979
Brickner v. Gooden green
okla · 1974
1 sentence

1979Armstrong v. Armstrong, 441 P.2d 699 (Alaska 1968) (governmental interests test); Schwartz v. Schwartz, 103 Ariz. 562 , 447 P.2d 254 (1968) (Restatement); Wallis v. Mrs. Smith’s Pie Co., 261 Ark. 622 , 550 S.W.2d 453 (1977) (Leflar); Reich v. Purcell, 67 Cal.2d 551 , 63 Cal.Rptr. 31 , 432 P.2d 727 (1967) (governmental interests); First National Bank in Fort Collins v. Rostek, 182 Colo. 437 , 514 P.2d 314 (1973) (Restatement); Gaither v. Myers, 131 U.S.App.D.C. 216 , 404 F.2d 216 (1968) (governmental interests); Ingersoll v. Klein, 46 I11.2d 42, 262 N.E.2d 593 (1970) (Restatement); Fuerste v. B

11979–1979
Beaulieu v. Beaulieu green
me · 1970
11979–1979
Heath v. Zellmer green
wis · 1967
2 sentences

1979Armstrong v. Armstrong, 441 P.2d 699 (Alaska 1968) (governmental interests test); Schwartz v. Schwartz, 103 Ariz. 562 , 447 P.2d 254 (1968) (Restatement); Wallis v. Mrs. Smith’s Pie Co., 261 Ark. 622 , 550 S.W.2d 453 (1977) (Leflar); Reich v. Purcell, 67 Cal.2d 551 , 63 Cal.Rptr. 31 , 432 P.2d 727 (1967) (governmental interests); First National Bank in Fort Collins v. Rostek, 182 Colo. 437 , 514 P.2d 314 (1973) (Restatement); Gaither v. Myers, 131 U.S.App.D.C. 216 , 404 F.2d 216 (1968) (governmental interests); Ingersoll v. Klein, 46 I11.2d 42, 262 N.E.2d 593 (1970) (Restatement); Fuerste v. B

1979Armstrong v. Armstrong, 441 P.2d 699 (Alaska 1968) (governmental interests test); Schwartz v. Schwartz, 103 Ariz. 562 , 447 P.2d 254 (1968) (Restatement); Wallis v. Mrs. Smith’s Pie Co., 261 Ark. 622 , 550 S.W.2d 453 (1977) (Leflar); Reich v. Purcell, 67 Cal.2d 551 , 63 Cal.Rptr. 31 , 432 P.2d 727 (1967) (governmental interests); First National Bank in Fort Collins v. Rostek, 182 Colo. 437 , 514 P.2d 314 (1973) (Restatement); Gaither v. Myers, 131 U.S.App.D.C. 216 , 404 F.2d 216 (1968) (governmental interests); Ingersoll v. Klein, 46 I11.2d 42, 262 N.E.2d 593 (1970) (Restatement); Fuerste v. B

11979–1979
Mitchell v. Craft green
miss · 1968
1 sentence

1979Armstrong v. Armstrong, 441 P.2d 699 (Alaska 1968) (governmental interests test); Schwartz v. Schwartz, 103 Ariz. 562 , 447 P.2d 254 (1968) (Restatement); Wallis v. Mrs. Smith’s Pie Co., 261 Ark. 622 , 550 S.W.2d 453 (1977) (Leflar); Reich v. Purcell, 67 Cal.2d 551 , 63 Cal.Rptr. 31 , 432 P.2d 727 (1967) (governmental interests); First National Bank in Fort Collins v. Rostek, 182 Colo. 437 , 514 P.2d 314 (1973) (Restatement); Gaither v. Myers, 131 U.S.App.D.C. 216 , 404 F.2d 216 (1968) (governmental interests); Ingersoll v. Klein, 46 I11.2d 42, 262 N.E.2d 593 (1970) (Restatement); Fuerste v. B

11979–1979
Casey v. Manson Construction & Engineering Co. green
or · 1967
2 sentences

1979Armstrong v. Armstrong, 441 P.2d 699 (Alaska 1968) (governmental interests test); Schwartz v. Schwartz, 103 Ariz. 562 , 447 P.2d 254 (1968) (Restatement); Wallis v. Mrs. Smith’s Pie Co., 261 Ark. 622 , 550 S.W.2d 453 (1977) (Leflar); Reich v. Purcell, 67 Cal.2d 551 , 63 Cal.Rptr. 31 , 432 P.2d 727 (1967) (governmental interests); First National Bank in Fort Collins v. Rostek, 182 Colo. 437 , 514 P.2d 314 (1973) (Restatement); Gaither v. Myers, 131 U.S.App.D.C. 216 , 404 F.2d 216 (1968) (governmental interests); Ingersoll v. Klein, 46 I11.2d 42, 262 N.E.2d 593 (1970) (Restatement); Fuerste v. B

1979Armstrong v. Armstrong, 441 P.2d 699 (Alaska 1968) (governmental interests test); Schwartz v. Schwartz, 103 Ariz. 562 , 447 P.2d 254 (1968) (Restatement); Wallis v. Mrs. Smith’s Pie Co., 261 Ark. 622 , 550 S.W.2d 453 (1977) (Leflar); Reich v. Purcell, 67 Cal.2d 551 , 63 Cal.Rptr. 31 , 432 P.2d 727 (1967) (governmental interests); First National Bank in Fort Collins v. Rostek, 182 Colo. 437 , 514 P.2d 314 (1973) (Restatement); Gaither v. Myers, 131 U.S.App.D.C. 216 , 404 F.2d 216 (1968) (governmental interests); Ingersoll v. Klein, 46 I11.2d 42, 262 N.E.2d 593 (1970) (Restatement); Fuerste v. B

11979–1979
Woodward v. Stewart green
ri · 1968
11979–1979
Armstrong v. Armstrong green
alaska · 1968
1 sentence

1979Armstrong v. Armstrong, 441 P.2d 699 (Alaska 1968) (governmental interests test); Schwartz v. Schwartz, 103 Ariz. 562 , 447 P.2d 254 (1968) (Restatement); Wallis v. Mrs. Smith’s Pie Co., 261 Ark. 622 , 550 S.W.2d 453 (1977) (Leflar); Reich v. Purcell, 67 Cal.2d 551 , 63 Cal.Rptr. 31 , 432 P.2d 727 (1967) (governmental interests); First National Bank in Fort Collins v. Rostek, 182 Colo. 437 , 514 P.2d 314 (1973) (Restatement); Gaither v. Myers, 131 U.S.App.D.C. 216 , 404 F.2d 216 (1968) (governmental interests); Ingersoll v. Klein, 46 I11.2d 42, 262 N.E.2d 593 (1970) (Restatement); Fuerste v. B

11979–1979
Wallis v. Mrs. Smith's Pie Co. green
ark · 1977
11979–1979
Wessling v. Paris green
kyctapphigh · 1967
1 sentence

1979Armstrong v. Armstrong, 441 P.2d 699 (Alaska 1968) (governmental interests test); Schwartz v. Schwartz, 103 Ariz. 562 , 447 P.2d 254 (1968) (Restatement); Wallis v. Mrs. Smith’s Pie Co., 261 Ark. 622 , 550 S.W.2d 453 (1977) (Leflar); Reich v. Purcell, 67 Cal.2d 551 , 63 Cal.Rptr. 31 , 432 P.2d 727 (1967) (governmental interests); First National Bank in Fort Collins v. Rostek, 182 Colo. 437 , 514 P.2d 314 (1973) (Restatement); Gaither v. Myers, 131 U.S.App.D.C. 216 , 404 F.2d 216 (1968) (governmental interests); Ingersoll v. Klein, 46 I11.2d 42, 262 N.E.2d 593 (1970) (Restatement); Fuerste v. B

11979–1979
Wilcox v. Wilcox green
wis · 1965
11979–1979
Frederick O. Gaither v. Charles R. Myers and American Motorist Insurance Co., a Corporation green
cadc · 1968
2 sentences

1979Armstrong v. Armstrong, 441 P.2d 699 (Alaska 1968) (governmental interests test); Schwartz v. Schwartz, 103 Ariz. 562 , 447 P.2d 254 (1968) (Restatement); Wallis v. Mrs. Smith’s Pie Co., 261 Ark. 622 , 550 S.W.2d 453 (1977) (Leflar); Reich v. Purcell, 67 Cal.2d 551 , 63 Cal.Rptr. 31 , 432 P.2d 727 (1967) (governmental interests); First National Bank in Fort Collins v. Rostek, 182 Colo. 437 , 514 P.2d 314 (1973) (Restatement); Gaither v. Myers, 131 U.S.App.D.C. 216 , 404 F.2d 216 (1968) (governmental interests); Ingersoll v. Klein, 46 I11.2d 42, 262 N.E.2d 593 (1970) (Restatement); Fuerste v. B

1979Armstrong v. Armstrong, 441 P.2d 699 (Alaska 1968) (governmental interests test); Schwartz v. Schwartz, 103 Ariz. 562 , 447 P.2d 254 (1968) (Restatement); Wallis v. Mrs. Smith’s Pie Co., 261 Ark. 622 , 550 S.W.2d 453 (1977) (Leflar); Reich v. Purcell, 67 Cal.2d 551 , 63 Cal.Rptr. 31 , 432 P.2d 727 (1967) (governmental interests); First National Bank in Fort Collins v. Rostek, 182 Colo. 437 , 514 P.2d 314 (1973) (Restatement); Gaither v. Myers, 131 U.S.App.D.C. 216 , 404 F.2d 216 (1968) (governmental interests); Ingersoll v. Klein, 46 I11.2d 42, 262 N.E.2d 593 (1970) (Restatement); Fuerste v. B

11979–1979
Johnson v. Spider Staging Corp. green
wash · 1976
2 sentences

1979Armstrong v. Armstrong, 441 P.2d 699 (Alaska 1968) (governmental interests test); Schwartz v. Schwartz, 103 Ariz. 562 , 447 P.2d 254 (1968) (Restatement); Wallis v. Mrs. Smith’s Pie Co., 261 Ark. 622 , 550 S.W.2d 453 (1977) (Leflar); Reich v. Purcell, 67 Cal.2d 551 , 63 Cal.Rptr. 31 , 432 P.2d 727 (1967) (governmental interests); First National Bank in Fort Collins v. Rostek, 182 Colo. 437 , 514 P.2d 314 (1973) (Restatement); Gaither v. Myers, 131 U.S.App.D.C. 216 , 404 F.2d 216 (1968) (governmental interests); Ingersoll v. Klein, 46 I11.2d 42, 262 N.E.2d 593 (1970) (Restatement); Fuerste v. B

1979Armstrong v. Armstrong, 441 P.2d 699 (Alaska 1968) (governmental interests test); Schwartz v. Schwartz, 103 Ariz. 562 , 447 P.2d 254 (1968) (Restatement); Wallis v. Mrs. Smith’s Pie Co., 261 Ark. 622 , 550 S.W.2d 453 (1977) (Leflar); Reich v. Purcell, 67 Cal.2d 551 , 63 Cal.Rptr. 31 , 432 P.2d 727 (1967) (governmental interests); First National Bank in Fort Collins v. Rostek, 182 Colo. 437 , 514 P.2d 314 (1973) (Restatement); Gaither v. Myers, 131 U.S.App.D.C. 216 , 404 F.2d 216 (1968) (governmental interests); Ingersoll v. Klein, 46 I11.2d 42, 262 N.E.2d 593 (1970) (Restatement); Fuerste v. B

11979–1979
Reich v. Purcell green
cal · 1967
2 sentences

1979Armstrong v. Armstrong, 441 P.2d 699 (Alaska 1968) (governmental interests test); Schwartz v. Schwartz, 103 Ariz. 562 , 447 P.2d 254 (1968) (Restatement); Wallis v. Mrs. Smith’s Pie Co., 261 Ark. 622 , 550 S.W.2d 453 (1977) (Leflar); Reich v. Purcell, 67 Cal.2d 551 , 63 Cal.Rptr. 31 , 432 P.2d 727 (1967) (governmental interests); First National Bank in Fort Collins v. Rostek, 182 Colo. 437 , 514 P.2d 314 (1973) (Restatement); Gaither v. Myers, 131 U.S.App.D.C. 216 , 404 F.2d 216 (1968) (governmental interests); Ingersoll v. Klein, 46 I11.2d 42, 262 N.E.2d 593 (1970) (Restatement); Fuerste v. B

1979Armstrong v. Armstrong, 441 P.2d 699 (Alaska 1968) (governmental interests test); Schwartz v. Schwartz, 103 Ariz. 562 , 447 P.2d 254 (1968) (Restatement); Wallis v. Mrs. Smith’s Pie Co., 261 Ark. 622 , 550 S.W.2d 453 (1977) (Leflar); Reich v. Purcell, 67 Cal.2d 551 , 63 Cal.Rptr. 31 , 432 P.2d 727 (1967) (governmental interests); First National Bank in Fort Collins v. Rostek, 182 Colo. 437 , 514 P.2d 314 (1973) (Restatement); Gaither v. Myers, 131 U.S.App.D.C. 216 , 404 F.2d 216 (1968) (governmental interests); Ingersoll v. Klein, 46 I11.2d 42, 262 N.E.2d 593 (1970) (Restatement); Fuerste v. B

11979–1979
Pevoski v. Pevoski green
mass · 1976
2 sentences

1979Armstrong v. Armstrong, 441 P.2d 699 (Alaska 1968) (governmental interests test); Schwartz v. Schwartz, 103 Ariz. 562 , 447 P.2d 254 (1968) (Restatement); Wallis v. Mrs. Smith’s Pie Co., 261 Ark. 622 , 550 S.W.2d 453 (1977) (Leflar); Reich v. Purcell, 67 Cal.2d 551 , 63 Cal.Rptr. 31 , 432 P.2d 727 (1967) (governmental interests); First National Bank in Fort Collins v. Rostek, 182 Colo. 437 , 514 P.2d 314 (1973) (Restatement); Gaither v. Myers, 131 U.S.App.D.C. 216 , 404 F.2d 216 (1968) (governmental interests); Ingersoll v. Klein, 46 I11.2d 42, 262 N.E.2d 593 (1970) (Restatement); Fuerste v. B

1979Armstrong v. Armstrong, 441 P.2d 699 (Alaska 1968) (governmental interests test); Schwartz v. Schwartz, 103 Ariz. 562 , 447 P.2d 254 (1968) (Restatement); Wallis v. Mrs. Smith’s Pie Co., 261 Ark. 622 , 550 S.W.2d 453 (1977) (Leflar); Reich v. Purcell, 67 Cal.2d 551 , 63 Cal.Rptr. 31 , 432 P.2d 727 (1967) (governmental interests); First National Bank in Fort Collins v. Rostek, 182 Colo. 437 , 514 P.2d 314 (1973) (Restatement); Gaither v. Myers, 131 U.S.App.D.C. 216 , 404 F.2d 216 (1968) (governmental interests); Ingersoll v. Klein, 46 I11.2d 42, 262 N.E.2d 593 (1970) (Restatement); Fuerste v. B

11979–1979
Milkovich v. Saari green
minn · 1973
2 sentences

1979Armstrong v. Armstrong, 441 P.2d 699 (Alaska 1968) (governmental interests test); Schwartz v. Schwartz, 103 Ariz. 562 , 447 P.2d 254 (1968) (Restatement); Wallis v. Mrs. Smith’s Pie Co., 261 Ark. 622 , 550 S.W.2d 453 (1977) (Leflar); Reich v. Purcell, 67 Cal.2d 551 , 63 Cal.Rptr. 31 , 432 P.2d 727 (1967) (governmental interests); First National Bank in Fort Collins v. Rostek, 182 Colo. 437 , 514 P.2d 314 (1973) (Restatement); Gaither v. Myers, 131 U.S.App.D.C. 216 , 404 F.2d 216 (1968) (governmental interests); Ingersoll v. Klein, 46 I11.2d 42, 262 N.E.2d 593 (1970) (Restatement); Fuerste v. B

1979Armstrong v. Armstrong, 441 P.2d 699 (Alaska 1968) (governmental interests test); Schwartz v. Schwartz, 103 Ariz. 562 , 447 P.2d 254 (1968) (Restatement); Wallis v. Mrs. Smith’s Pie Co., 261 Ark. 622 , 550 S.W.2d 453 (1977) (Leflar); Reich v. Purcell, 67 Cal.2d 551 , 63 Cal.Rptr. 31 , 432 P.2d 727 (1967) (governmental interests); First National Bank in Fort Collins v. Rostek, 182 Colo. 437 , 514 P.2d 314 (1973) (Restatement); Gaither v. Myers, 131 U.S.App.D.C. 216 , 404 F.2d 216 (1968) (governmental interests); Ingersoll v. Klein, 46 I11.2d 42, 262 N.E.2d 593 (1970) (Restatement); Fuerste v. B

11979–1979
First National Bank in Fort Collins v. Rostek green
colo · 1973
2 sentences

1979Armstrong v. Armstrong, 441 P.2d 699 (Alaska 1968) (governmental interests test); Schwartz v. Schwartz, 103 Ariz. 562 , 447 P.2d 254 (1968) (Restatement); Wallis v. Mrs. Smith’s Pie Co., 261 Ark. 622 , 550 S.W.2d 453 (1977) (Leflar); Reich v. Purcell, 67 Cal.2d 551 , 63 Cal.Rptr. 31 , 432 P.2d 727 (1967) (governmental interests); First National Bank in Fort Collins v. Rostek, 182 Colo. 437 , 514 P.2d 314 (1973) (Restatement); Gaither v. Myers, 131 U.S.App.D.C. 216 , 404 F.2d 216 (1968) (governmental interests); Ingersoll v. Klein, 46 I11.2d 42, 262 N.E.2d 593 (1970) (Restatement); Fuerste v. B

1979Armstrong v. Armstrong, 441 P.2d 699 (Alaska 1968) (governmental interests test); Schwartz v. Schwartz, 103 Ariz. 562 , 447 P.2d 254 (1968) (Restatement); Wallis v. Mrs. Smith’s Pie Co., 261 Ark. 622 , 550 S.W.2d 453 (1977) (Leflar); Reich v. Purcell, 67 Cal.2d 551 , 63 Cal.Rptr. 31 , 432 P.2d 727 (1967) (governmental interests); First National Bank in Fort Collins v. Rostek, 182 Colo. 437 , 514 P.2d 314 (1973) (Restatement); Gaither v. Myers, 131 U.S.App.D.C. 216 , 404 F.2d 216 (1968) (governmental interests); Ingersoll v. Klein, 46 I11.2d 42, 262 N.E.2d 593 (1970) (Restatement); Fuerste v. B

11979–1979
World Airways, Inc. v. Pan American World Airways, Inc. green
scotus · 1968
1 sentence

1979Armstrong v. Armstrong, 441 P.2d 699 (Alaska 1968) (governmental interests test); Schwartz v. Schwartz, 103 Ariz. 562 , 447 P.2d 254 (1968) (Restatement); Wallis v. Mrs. Smith’s Pie Co., 261 Ark. 622 , 550 S.W.2d 453 (1977) (Leflar); Reich v. Purcell, 67 Cal.2d 551 , 63 Cal.Rptr. 31 , 432 P.2d 727 (1967) (governmental interests); First National Bank in Fort Collins v. Rostek, 182 Colo. 437 , 514 P.2d 314 (1973) (Restatement); Gaither v. Myers, 131 U.S.App.D.C. 216 , 404 F.2d 216 (1968) (governmental interests); Ingersoll v. Klein, 46 I11.2d 42, 262 N.E.2d 593 (1970) (Restatement); Fuerste v. B

11979–1979
Valenti v. Lumbard green
scotus · 1968
11979–1979
Jagers v. Royal Indemnity Company green
la · 1973
1 sentence

1979Armstrong v. Armstrong, 441 P.2d 699 (Alaska 1968) (governmental interests test); Schwartz v. Schwartz, 103 Ariz. 562 , 447 P.2d 254 (1968) (Restatement); Wallis v. Mrs. Smith’s Pie Co., 261 Ark. 622 , 550 S.W.2d 453 (1977) (Leflar); Reich v. Purcell, 67 Cal.2d 551 , 63 Cal.Rptr. 31 , 432 P.2d 727 (1967) (governmental interests); First National Bank in Fort Collins v. Rostek, 182 Colo. 437 , 514 P.2d 314 (1973) (Restatement); Gaither v. Myers, 131 U.S.App.D.C. 216 , 404 F.2d 216 (1968) (governmental interests); Ingersoll v. Klein, 46 I11.2d 42, 262 N.E.2d 593 (1970) (Restatement); Fuerste v. B

11979–1979
Fuerste v. Bemis green
iowa · 1968
1 sentence

1979Armstrong v. Armstrong, 441 P.2d 699 (Alaska 1968) (governmental interests test); Schwartz v. Schwartz, 103 Ariz. 562 , 447 P.2d 254 (1968) (Restatement); Wallis v. Mrs. Smith’s Pie Co., 261 Ark. 622 , 550 S.W.2d 453 (1977) (Leflar); Reich v. Purcell, 67 Cal.2d 551 , 63 Cal.Rptr. 31 , 432 P.2d 727 (1967) (governmental interests); First National Bank in Fort Collins v. Rostek, 182 Colo. 437 , 514 P.2d 314 (1973) (Restatement); Gaither v. Myers, 131 U.S.App.D.C. 216 , 404 F.2d 216 (1968) (governmental interests); Ingersoll v. Klein, 46 I11.2d 42, 262 N.E.2d 593 (1970) (Restatement); Fuerste v. B

11979–1979
Babcock v. Jackson green
ny · 1963
2 sentences

1979Armstrong v. Armstrong, 441 P.2d 699 (Alaska 1968) (governmental interests test); Schwartz v. Schwartz, 103 Ariz. 562 , 447 P.2d 254 (1968) (Restatement); Wallis v. Mrs. Smith’s Pie Co., 261 Ark. 622 , 550 S.W.2d 453 (1977) (Leflar); Reich v. Purcell, 67 Cal.2d 551 , 63 Cal.Rptr. 31 , 432 P.2d 727 (1967) (governmental interests); First National Bank in Fort Collins v. Rostek, 182 Colo. 437 , 514 P.2d 314 (1973) (Restatement); Gaither v. Myers, 131 U.S.App.D.C. 216 , 404 F.2d 216 (1968) (governmental interests); Ingersoll v. Klein, 46 I11.2d 42, 262 N.E.2d 593 (1970) (Restatement); Fuerste v. B

1979Armstrong v. Armstrong, 441 P.2d 699 (Alaska 1968) (governmental interests test); Schwartz v. Schwartz, 103 Ariz. 562 , 447 P.2d 254 (1968) (Restatement); Wallis v. Mrs. Smith’s Pie Co., 261 Ark. 622 , 550 S.W.2d 453 (1977) (Leflar); Reich v. Purcell, 67 Cal.2d 551 , 63 Cal.Rptr. 31 , 432 P.2d 727 (1967) (governmental interests); First National Bank in Fort Collins v. Rostek, 182 Colo. 437 , 514 P.2d 314 (1973) (Restatement); Gaither v. Myers, 131 U.S.App.D.C. 216 , 404 F.2d 216 (1968) (governmental interests); Ingersoll v. Klein, 46 I11.2d 42, 262 N.E.2d 593 (1970) (Restatement); Fuerste v. B

11979–1979
Mellk v. Sarahson green
nj · 1967
11979–1979
Tooker v. Lopez green
ny · 1969
2 sentences

1979Armstrong v. Armstrong, 441 P.2d 699 (Alaska 1968) (governmental interests test); Schwartz v. Schwartz, 103 Ariz. 562 , 447 P.2d 254 (1968) (Restatement); Wallis v. Mrs. Smith’s Pie Co., 261 Ark. 622 , 550 S.W.2d 453 (1977) (Leflar); Reich v. Purcell, 67 Cal.2d 551 , 63 Cal.Rptr. 31 , 432 P.2d 727 (1967) (governmental interests); First National Bank in Fort Collins v. Rostek, 182 Colo. 437 , 514 P.2d 314 (1973) (Restatement); Gaither v. Myers, 131 U.S.App.D.C. 216 , 404 F.2d 216 (1968) (governmental interests); Ingersoll v. Klein, 46 I11.2d 42, 262 N.E.2d 593 (1970) (Restatement); Fuerste v. B

1979Armstrong v. Armstrong, 441 P.2d 699 (Alaska 1968) (governmental interests test); Schwartz v. Schwartz, 103 Ariz. 562 , 447 P.2d 254 (1968) (Restatement); Wallis v. Mrs. Smith’s Pie Co., 261 Ark. 622 , 550 S.W.2d 453 (1977) (Leflar); Reich v. Purcell, 67 Cal.2d 551 , 63 Cal.Rptr. 31 , 432 P.2d 727 (1967) (governmental interests); First National Bank in Fort Collins v. Rostek, 182 Colo. 437 , 514 P.2d 314 (1973) (Restatement); Gaither v. Myers, 131 U.S.App.D.C. 216 , 404 F.2d 216 (1968) (governmental interests); Ingersoll v. Klein, 46 I11.2d 42, 262 N.E.2d 593 (1970) (Restatement); Fuerste v. B

11979–1979
Kennedy v. Dixon green
mo · 1969
1 sentence

1979Armstrong v. Armstrong, 441 P.2d 699 (Alaska 1968) (governmental interests test); Schwartz v. Schwartz, 103 Ariz. 562 , 447 P.2d 254 (1968) (Restatement); Wallis v. Mrs. Smith’s Pie Co., 261 Ark. 622 , 550 S.W.2d 453 (1977) (Leflar); Reich v. Purcell, 67 Cal.2d 551 , 63 Cal.Rptr. 31 , 432 P.2d 727 (1967) (governmental interests); First National Bank in Fort Collins v. Rostek, 182 Colo. 437 , 514 P.2d 314 (1973) (Restatement); Gaither v. Myers, 131 U.S.App.D.C. 216 , 404 F.2d 216 (1968) (governmental interests); Ingersoll v. Klein, 46 I11.2d 42, 262 N.E.2d 593 (1970) (Restatement); Fuerste v. B

11979–1979
Ingersoll v. Klein green
ill · 1970
11979–1979
Schwartz v. Schwartz green
ariz · 1968
2 sentences

1979Armstrong v. Armstrong, 441 P.2d 699 (Alaska 1968) (governmental interests test); Schwartz v. Schwartz, 103 Ariz. 562 , 447 P.2d 254 (1968) (Restatement); Wallis v. Mrs. Smith’s Pie Co., 261 Ark. 622 , 550 S.W.2d 453 (1977) (Leflar); Reich v. Purcell, 67 Cal.2d 551 , 63 Cal.Rptr. 31 , 432 P.2d 727 (1967) (governmental interests); First National Bank in Fort Collins v. Rostek, 182 Colo. 437 , 514 P.2d 314 (1973) (Restatement); Gaither v. Myers, 131 U.S.App.D.C. 216 , 404 F.2d 216 (1968) (governmental interests); Ingersoll v. Klein, 46 I11.2d 42, 262 N.E.2d 593 (1970) (Restatement); Fuerste v. B

1979Armstrong v. Armstrong, 441 P.2d 699 (Alaska 1968) (governmental interests test); Schwartz v. Schwartz, 103 Ariz. 562 , 447 P.2d 254 (1968) (Restatement); Wallis v. Mrs. Smith’s Pie Co., 261 Ark. 622 , 550 S.W.2d 453 (1977) (Leflar); Reich v. Purcell, 67 Cal.2d 551 , 63 Cal.Rptr. 31 , 432 P.2d 727 (1967) (governmental interests); First National Bank in Fort Collins v. Rostek, 182 Colo. 437 , 514 P.2d 314 (1973) (Restatement); Gaither v. Myers, 131 U.S.App.D.C. 216 , 404 F.2d 216 (1968) (governmental interests); Ingersoll v. Klein, 46 I11.2d 42, 262 N.E.2d 593 (1970) (Restatement); Fuerste v. B

11979–1979
McBrayer v. Virginia-Carolina Chemical Co. green
sc · 1911
1 sentence

1979Armstrong v. Armstrong, 441 P.2d 699 (Alaska 1968) (governmental interests test); Schwartz v. Schwartz, 103 Ariz. 562 , 447 P.2d 254 (1968) (Restatement); Wallis v. Mrs. Smith’s Pie Co., 261 Ark. 622 , 550 S.W.2d 453 (1977) (Leflar); Reich v. Purcell, 67 Cal.2d 551 , 63 Cal.Rptr. 31 , 432 P.2d 727 (1967) (governmental interests); First National Bank in Fort Collins v. Rostek, 182 Colo. 437 , 514 P.2d 314 (1973) (Restatement); Gaither v. Myers, 131 U.S.App.D.C. 216 , 404 F.2d 216 (1968) (governmental interests); Ingersoll v. Klein, 46 I11.2d 42, 262 N.E.2d 593 (1970) (Restatement); Fuerste v. B

11979–1979

Where else courts name it

FL 19 (1967–2017) PA 19 (1964–2025) MI 17 (1968–2002) MD 15 (1981–2024) WV 14 (1987–2024) IN 12 (1980–2024) NC 12 (1989–2020) GA 11 (1996–2023) CT 11 (1986–2000) IL 10 (1969–2007) NY 10 (1955–1994) NM 7 (1976–2015) AL 7 (1980–2014) NJ 7 (1973–2006) RI 7 (1968–2011) TX 6 (1979–2009) MO 6 (1969–1988) WA 5 (2012–2025) AR 5 (1977–2021) WI 5 (1965–2024) DE 5 (1979–2011) VA 5 (2006–2024) SC 4 (1964–2015) MA 3 (1997–2004) ND 3 (1972–1998) SD 3 (1989–1997) LA 3 (1973–1981) KS 3 (1985–2024) IA 2 (1971–1973) CO 2 (1973–1978) WY 2 (1988–2015) VT 2 (1989–1997) OK 2 (2003–2026) TN 2 (1992–2006)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check