Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 Texas opinions name it 2 courts 1989–2013 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
In Re Shredder Co., LLCgreen2 sentences2009See In re Shredder, 225 S.W.3d at 680 . 2009See In re Shredder , 225 S.W.3d at 680 . | 2 | 2 |
Miss. Lofts v. Lexington Ins. Co. of Wilmingtongreen1 sentence1989The insurance company is not entitled to a money judgment from the plaintiff in the amount it paid to Interfirst Bank in addition to the rights it received from the bank under the assignment_ Since the defendant in its counterclaim seeks only a damage award, and not a declaration that the assignment of the deed of trust by Interfirst was valid, the Court must enter judgment against defendant. 653 F.Supp. at 347 (emphasis added). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Hoskins v. Bekins Van Lines
green
2 sentences2013Id. at 806 (quoting Hoskins, 343 F.3d at 773 , emphasis in original, internal quotation marks partially omitted). 2012Id. at 806 (quoting Hoskins, 343 F.3d at 773 , emphasis in original, internal quotation marks partially omitted). | 2 | 2012–2013 |
Daybreak Express, Inc. v. Lexington Insurance Co.
green
2 sentences2013Id. at 806 (quoting Hoskins, 343 F.3d at 773 , emphasis in original, internal quotation marks partially omitted). 2012Id. at 806 (quoting Hoskins, 343 F.3d at 773 , emphasis in original, internal quotation marks partially omitted). | 2 | 2012–2013 |
Lexington Insurance Company, as Subrogee of Burr Computer Environments, Inc. and J. Supor and Sons Trucking and Rigging Co. v. Daybreak Express, Inc.
green
1 sentence2013Daybreak removed the case to federal court, arguing that Lexington’s claim “is a civil action pending in the State Court against a common carrier to recover damages for alleged delay, loss, or injury to a shipment arising under the Interstate Commerce Act.” Id. (citing 49 U.S.C.A. § 14706 (West 2005)). | 1 | 2013–2013 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.