Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 Texas opinions name it 2 courts 1991–2006 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Carter v. Stategreen2 sentences2006See Weaver, 855 S.W.2d at 121 (holding that the marital communication privilege of Rule 504(a) applies to utterances and not to acts); see also Carter v. State, 550 S.W.2d 282, 286 (Tex. Crim. 2006CONFRONTATION In points of error seven through eleven, Irvan argues that "the trial court committed 12 See Weaver, 855 S.W.2d at 121 (holding that the marital communication privilege of Rule 504(a) applies to utterances and not to acts); see also Carter v. State, 550 S.W.2d 282, 286 (Tex. Crim. | 4 | 4 |
Shipman v. Stategreen2 sentences2006App. 1977), overruled on other grounds by Shipman v. State, 604 S.W.2d 182, 185 (Tex. Crim. 2006App. 1977), overruled on other grounds by Shipman v. State, 604 S.W.2d 182, 185 (Tex. Crim. | 2 | 2 |
Weaver v. Stategreen2 sentences2006See Weaver, 855 S.W.2d at 121 (holding that the marital communication privilege of Rule 504(a) applies to utterances and not to acts); see also Carter v. State, 550 S.W.2d 282, 286 (Tex. Crim. 2006CONFRONTATION In points of error seven through eleven, Irvan argues that "the trial court committed 12 See Weaver, 855 S.W.2d at 121 (holding that the marital communication privilege of Rule 504(a) applies to utterances and not to acts); see also Carter v. State, 550 S.W.2d 282, 286 (Tex. Crim. | 2 | 2 |
Trammel v. United Statesgreen2 sentences1996In fact, privileges expressly subordinate the goal of truth-seeking to other societal interests, and the societal interest to be protected by the marital communication privilege — which was one of the first privileges to be recognized— is the institution of marriage. 10 See Trammel v. United States, 445 U.S. 40, 45 , 100 S.Ct. 906, 909 , 63 L.Ed.2d 186, 190 (1980). 1996In fact, privileges expressly subordinate the goal of truth-seeking to other societal interests, and the societal interest to be protected by the marital communication privilege — which was one of the first privileges to be recognized— is the institution of marriage. 10 See Trammel v. United States, 445 U.S. 40, 45 , 100 S.Ct. 906, 909 , 63 L.Ed.2d 186, 190 (1980). | 1 | 1 |
Grundstrom v. Stategreen1 sentence1991Carter v. State, 550 S.W.2d 282, 286 (Tex.Cr. *262 App.1977); Grundstrom v. State, 456 S.W.2d 92, 93 (Tex.Cr.App.1970). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Sterling v. State
green
1 sentence1993Sterling v. State, 814 S.W.2d 261 (Tex.App.—Austin 1991, pet. ref’d). | 1 | 1993–1993 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.