Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 Texas opinions name it 2 courts 1975–2022 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
In the Interest of A.B.B.green1 sentence2022To the extent that Mary’s brief can be understood to mean that counsel should have prosecuted her private suit to terminate parental rights earlier, “[t]he doctrine of ineffective assistance of counsel does not apply in civil cases where there is no constitutional or statutory right to counsel.” In re A.B.B., 482 S.W.3d 135, 140 (Tex. App.—El Paso 2015, pet. dism’d, w.o.j.) (citing In re C.J., No. 04-14-00663-CV, 2015 WL 1089660 , at *2 (Tex. App.—San Antonio Mar. 11, 2015, no pet.) (mem. op.) (citing Culver v. Culver, 360 S.W.3d 526, 535 (Tex. App.—Texarkana 2011, no pet.))). | 1 | 1 |
Culver v. Culvergreen1 sentence2022To the extent that Mary’s brief can be understood to mean that counsel should have prosecuted her private suit to terminate parental rights earlier, “[t]he doctrine of ineffective assistance of counsel does not apply in civil cases where there is no constitutional or statutory right to counsel.” In re A.B.B., 482 S.W.3d 135, 140 (Tex. App.—El Paso 2015, pet. dism’d, w.o.j.) (citing In re C.J., No. 04-14-00663-CV, 2015 WL 1089660 , at *2 (Tex. App.—San Antonio Mar. 11, 2015, no pet.) (mem. op.) (citing Culver v. Culver, 360 S.W.3d 526, 535 (Tex. App.—Texarkana 2011, no pet.))). | 1 | 1 |
In re L. M. M.green1 sentence2019See In re L.M.M., 522 S.W.3d at 45 . | 1 | 1 |
In Re MCFgreen1 sentence2019In re M.C.F., 121 S.W.3d 891, 895 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 2003, no pet.). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Dowdle
green
2 sentences2016Id. at 121-22 . -.Our further opinion overruling Mary's motion for rehearing contains .the passage quoted by the majority, beginning, “Courts cannot marry parties by mere presumption without their consent.” Id. at 124 . 2016Id. at 121-22 . -.Our further opinion overruling Mary's motion for rehearing contains .the passage quoted by the majority, beginning, “Courts cannot marry parties by mere presumption without their consent.” Id. at 124 . | 1 | 2016–2016 |
Massey v. Armco Steel Co.
green
1 sentence1988Massey v. Armco Steel Co., 652 S.W.2d 932 (Tex.1983). | 1 | 1988–1988 |
Wilcox v. St. Mary's University of San Antonio, Inc.
green
1 sentence1975On appeal by the defendants, the court of civil appeals affirmed. 497 S.W.2d 782 , Tex.Civ.App. | 1 | 1975–1975 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.