Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 Texas opinions name it 1 courts 2010–2011 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Smith v. Stategreen2 sentences2010See Smith, 898 S.W.2d at 846 . 6 This is further support for the view that this Court believed that the future-dangerousness special issue asks a jury to decide whether a defendant would be dangerous “whether in or out of prison” without re *283 gard to how long the defendant would actually spend in prison if sentenced to life. 2010See Smith , 898 S.W.2d at 846 . (6) This is further support for the view that this Court believed that the future-dangerousness special issue asks a jury to decide whether a defendant would be dangerous "whether in or out of prison" without regard to how long the defendant would actually spend in prison if sentenced to life. | 3 | 3 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Estrada v. State
green
2 sentences2011Estrada , 313 S.W.3d at 282 n.6. 31. 2011Estrada, 313 S.W.3d at 282 n.6. | 3 | 2011–2011 |