must give instruction (Texas) · Go Syfert
← Texas issues

must give instruction in Texas

6 Texas opinions name it 2 courts 1954–2015 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (3)

CaseFollowedCited
Landa v. Obertgreen
· 1876 · cited in 3 Texas opinions naming this issue, 1983–2015
2 sentences

2015"This is the cornerstone of our judicial sys- the jury's findings on malicious prosecution, intentional tem." Id. 111When the facts are in controversy the question infliction of emotional distress, and negligent hiring, we of probable cause must necessarily go to the jury, and reverse the judgment of the trial court and render judg- then the court must give such instruction as will enable ment in favor ofWal-Mart and Cruickshank. them to draw the correct conclusion from the facts as they may find them and the law thus given."' !d. (quoting Karen Angelini, Justice Landa v. Obert, 45 Tex. 539, 5

1997This is a cornerstone of our judicial system. ‘When the facts are in controversy the question of probable cause must necessarily go to the jury, and then the court must give such instruction as will enable them to draw the correct conclusion from the facts as they may find them and the law thus given.’ (Citations omitted.) Lando, v. Obert, 45 Tex. 539, 543 (1876).

33
Huizar v. Stategreen
texcrimapp · 2000 · cited in 1 Texas opinions naming this issue, 2006–2006
1 sentence

2006See id.

11
George v. Stategreen
texcrimapp · 1994 · cited in 1 Texas opinions naming this issue, 1997–1997
2 sentences

1997George v. State , 890 S.W.2d 73, 76 (Tex. Crim.

1997George v. State , 890 S.W.2d 73, 76 (Tex. Crim.

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (3)

CaseCitedYears
Akin v. Dahl green
tex · 1983
1 sentence

1997Akin, 661 S.W.2d at 921 .

11997–1997
Buchanan v. Rose green
tex · 1942
2 sentences

1954The legal duty of the McKowns who actually closed the west prong of divided East Avenue and thus created the dangerous condition to which the accident is attributable is stated by the Supreme Court in Buchanan v. Rose, 138 Tex. 390 , 159 S.W.2d 109, 110 , as follows: "We think it may also be said that if one by his own acts, although without negligence on his part, creates a dangerous situation in or along a public way and it reasonably appears that another in the lawful use of such way in the exercise of ordinary care for his own safety may be injured by the dangerous situation so created, th

1954The legal duty of the McKowns who actually closed the west prong of divided East Avenue and thus created the dangerous condition to which the accident is attributable is stated by the Supreme Court in Buchanan v. Rose, 138 Tex. 390 , 159 S.W.2d 109, 110 , as follows: "We think it may also be said that if one by his own acts, although without negligence on his part, creates a dangerous situation in or along a public way and it reasonably appears that another in the lawful use of such way in the exercise of ordinary care for his own safety may be injured by the dangerous situation so created, th

11954–1954
Shuford v. City of Dallas neutral
tex · 1945
2 sentences

1954The duty of ordinary or reasonable care * * * is a continuing duty, which is not suspended while the street is being repaired."'" Shuford v. City of Dallas, 144 Tex. 342 , 190 S.W.2d 721, 724 .

1954The duty of ordinary or reasonable care * * * is a continuing duty, which is not suspended while the street is being repaired."'" Shuford v. City of Dallas, 144 Tex. 342 , 190 S.W.2d 721, 724 .

11954–1954

Where else courts name it

NC 54 (1956–2025) CA 27 (1983–2025) DC 9 (1996–2017) PA 7 (1990–2020) TX 6 (1954–2015) OH 5 (2003–2023) WA 4 (2010–2019) WY 4 (1995–2003) IN 4 (1988–2020) MI 3 (1982–2026) AZ 3 (1976–2025) MO 3 (1975–1998) MN 2 (1991–2001) CO 2 (2025–2025) IA 2 (2022–2023) OR 2 (2023–2023) UT 2 (1998–2017)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check