Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 Texas opinions name it 2 courts 2007–2024 3 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Harris County v. Sykesgreen1 sentence2024See Harris Cnty. v. Sykes, 136 S.W.3d 635, 639 (Tex. 2004) (holding that after governmental entity 9 files plea to jurisdiction and plaintiff fails, after reasonable opportunity, to cure defective pleadings, case should be dismissed with prejudice “because a plaintiff should not be permitted to relitigate jurisdiction once that issue has been finally determined”). | 1 | 1 |
The City of Houston v. Steve Williamsgreen1 sentence2024If the Developer performed by participating in and funding the Southside project, SAWS’s putative unilateral offer would become a unilateral contract. 55 Even if the project constituted only partial performance of the Contract as a whole, the Contract imposes legal obligations on SAWS based on the Developer’s performance on the Southside project, including that the Developer would be eligible for collection credits. 56 In the lower courts, it was undisputed that the Developer decided to participate in and timely completed the Southside project. 57 The Developer also attached to its response to | 1 | 1 |
Frequent Flyer Depot, Inc. v. American Airlines, Inc.green1 sentence2024Airlines, Inc., 281 S.W.3d 215, 224-25 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 2009, pet. denied) (“[E]ven if an illusory promise renders a contract unilateral, consideration can still be established by part performance by the promisee.”); Sunshine v. Manos, 496 S.W.2d 195, 199 (Tex. Civ. | 1 | 1 |
Sunshine v. Manosgreen1 sentence2024Airlines, Inc., 281 S.W.3d 215, 224-25 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 2009, pet. denied) (“[E]ven if an illusory promise renders a contract unilateral, consideration can still be established by part performance by the promisee.”); Sunshine v. Manos, 496 S.W.2d 195, 199 (Tex. Civ. | 1 | 1 |
San Antonio Water System v. Debra Nicholasgreen1 sentence2024GOVERNMENTAL IMMUNITY “SAWS is a governmental entity owned by the City of San Antonio that provides water and wastewater services in Bexar and neighboring counties.” San Antonio Water Sys. v. Nicholas, 461 S.W.3d 131, 135 (Tex. 2015). | 1 | 1 |
Hutchings v. Slemonsgreen1 sentence2024If the Developer performed by participating in and funding the Southside project, SAWS’s putative unilateral offer would become a unilateral contract. 55 Even if the project constituted only partial performance of the Contract as a whole, the Contract imposes legal obligations on SAWS based on the Developer’s performance on the Southside project, including that the Developer would be eligible for collection credits. 56 In the lower courts, it was undisputed that the Developer decided to participate in and timely completed the Southside project. 57 The Developer also attached to its response to | 1 | 1 |
County of Bexar v. Stewardgreen1 sentence2023Id. at 160 ; County of Bexar v. Steward, 139 S.W.3d 354, 357 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 2004, no pet.). 2 The order granting SAWS’s plea to the jurisdiction was signed by the Honorable John D. | 1 | 1 |
City of Dallas v. VSC, LLCgreen1 sentence2014See City of Dall. v. VSC, LLC, 347 S.W.3d 231, 236 (Tex.2011); Jennings, 142 S.W.3d at 313-14 . | 1 | 1 |
Thomas v. Longgreen2 sentences2014See Thomas, 207 S.W.3d at 388-39 . 2014See Thomas, 207 S.W.3d at 338-39 ; Miranda, 133 S.W.3d at 227-28 . | 1 | 1 |
Valence Operating Co. v. Dorsettgreen1 sentence2007Valence Operating Co. v. Dorsett, 164 S.W.3d 656, 661 (Tex. 2005). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Texas Department of Parks & Wildlife v. Miranda
green
2 sentences2014See Thomas, 207 S.W.3d at 338-39 ; Miranda, 133 S.W.3d at 227-28 . 2012Id. 1 Although courts occasionally use the terms “sovereign immunity” and “governmental immunity” interchangeably, they are distinct concepts. | 2 | 2012–2014 |
Houston Belt & Terminal Railway Co., Bnsf Railway Co., and Union Pacific Railroad Co. v. City of Houston, Texas and Daniel Krueger, in His Official Capacity as Director of Public Works and Engineering
green
1 sentence2023Id. at 160 ; County of Bexar v. Steward, 139 S.W.3d 354, 357 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 2004, no pet.). 2 The order granting SAWS’s plea to the jurisdiction was signed by the Honorable John D. | 1 | 2023–2023 |
City of Dallas v. Jennings
green
2 sentences2014See City of Dall. v. VSC, LLC, 347 S.W.3d 231, 236 (Tex.2011); Jennings, 142 S.W.3d at 313-14 . 2014See id.; Jennings, 142 S.W.3d at 314 . | 1 | 2014–2014 |
Texas Parks & Wildlife Department v. E.E. Lowrey Realty, Ltd.
green
1 sentence2014Lowrey Realty, 235 S.W.3d at 694 ; Whitley, 104 S.W.3d at 543 . | 1 | 2014–2014 |
Dallas Area Rapid Transit v. Whitley
green
1 sentence2014Lowrey Realty, 235 S.W.3d at 694 ; Whitley, 104 S.W.3d at 543 . | 1 | 2014–2014 |