second question analysis (Texas) · Go Syfert
← Texas issues

second question analysis in Texas

6 Texas opinions name it 1 courts 1992–2009 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (2)

CaseFollowedCited
City of Erie v. Pap's A. M.green
scotus · 2000 · cited in 4 Texas opinions naming this issue, 2009–2009
2 sentences

2009The second question in the analysis is whether the restriction is content-neutral or content-based, see id.; the answer to this question determines what level of scrutiny should be applied, see City of Erie v. Pap’s A.M., 529 U.S. 277, 278 , 120 S.Ct. 1382 , 146 L.Ed.2d 265 (2000) (plurality op.).

2009The second question in the analysis is whether the restriction is content-neutral or content-based, see id.; the answer to this question determines what level of scrutiny should be applied, see City of Erie v. Pap’s A.M., 529 U.S. 277, 278 , 120 S.Ct. 1382 , 146 L.Ed.2d 265 (2000) (plurality op.).

24
Liebman v. Stategreen
texcrimapp · 1983 · cited in 2 Texas opinions naming this issue, 1992–1992
2 sentences

1992Liebman v. State, 652 S.W.2d 942, 945-46 (Tex.Crim.App.1983).

1992Liebman v. State , 652 S.W.2d 942, 945-46 (Tex. Crim.

22

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (1)

CaseCitedYears
City of Renton v. Playtime Theatres, Inc. green
scotus · 1986
1 sentence

2009The second question in the analysis is whether the restriction is content-neutral or content-based, see id. ; the answer to this question determines what level of scrutiny should be applied, see City of Erie v. Pap's A.M. , 529 U.S. 277, 278 (2000) (plurality op.).

12009–2009

Where else courts name it

CA 7 (1958–2023) TX 6 (1992–2009) NM 5 (1999–2013) LA 2 (1997–2016)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check