should conduct inquiry (Texas) · Go Syfert
← Texas issues

should conduct inquiry in Texas

6 Texas opinions name it 2 courts 1980–2015 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (0)

CaseFollowedCited
No positive-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas.

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (4)

CaseCitedYears
Alcott v. State green
texcrimapp · 2001
2 sentences

2009Alcott , 51 S.W.3d at 602 .

2003Alcott, 51 S.W.3d at 602 .

42002–2009
Maritime Overseas Corp. v. Ellis green
tex · 1998
1 sentence

2015No claim to original U.S. Government Works. 13 Maritime Overseas Corp. v. Ellis, 971 S.W.2d 402 (1998) 41 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 683 based on non-probative evidence, even though the evidence injuries caused by [the Hospital's] negligence.” Murdock, 946 was admitted without objection.

12015–2015
State Bar of Texas v. Leighton green
tex · 1998
1 sentence

2015No claim to original U.S. Government Works. 13 Maritime Overseas Corp. v. Ellis, 971 S.W.2d 402 (1998) 41 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 683 based on non-probative evidence, even though the evidence injuries caused by [the Hospital's] negligence.” Murdock, 946 was admitted without objection.

12015–2015
Vardas v. State green
texcrimapp · 1972
1 sentence

1980Once this occurs, the court should conduct a hearing out of the presence of the jury to determine whether or not there is in fact an issue as to the competence of the accused to stand trial.” (Emphasis supplied.) In Vardas v. State, 488 S.W.2d 467 (Tex.Cr.App.1972), this court wrote: “Even where no request or demand is made for a preliminary hearing but evidence as to the accused’s present incompetence becomes sufficiently manifest during the trial on the merits, then due process of law would require the trial judge to halt the trial and conduct a hearing on that issue on his own initiative be

11980–1980

Where else courts name it

NY 8 (1977–2023) NJ 8 (2017–2024) IL 7 (1975–2016) TX 6 (1980–2015) MT 4 (1998–2003) CO 3 (1982–2024) OH 3 (2002–2022) MA 3 (1976–2015) FL 2 (1985–2007) SC 2 (2017–2017) CA 2 (1981–1996) DE 2 (1930–2019) PA 2 (1984–2015) MI 2 (1998–2013)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check