Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 Texas opinions name it 2 courts 1986–2015 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Travis County v. Pelzel & Associates, Inc.red2 sentences2004See Travis County v. Pelzel & Assocs., Inc., 77 S.W.3d 246, 248 (Tex. 2002); Little-Tex Insulation Co., 39 S.W.3d at 594-95 ; Fed. Sign, 951 S.W.2d at 408 . 2004See Travis County v. Pelzel & Assocs., Inc. , 77 S.W.3d 246, 248 (Tex. 2002); Little-Tex Insulation Co. , 39 S.W.3d at 594-95; Fed. Sign , 951 S.W.2d at 408 . | 3 | 3 |
General Services v. Little-Tex Insulationred2 sentences2004See Travis County v. Pelzel & Assocs., Inc., 77 S.W.3d 246, 248 (Tex. 2002); Little-Tex Insulation Co., 39 S.W.3d at 594-95 ; Fed. Sign, 951 S.W.2d at 408 . 2004See Travis County v. Pelzel & Assocs., Inc. , 77 S.W.3d 246, 248 (Tex. 2002); Little-Tex Insulation Co. , 39 S.W.3d at 594-95; Fed. Sign , 951 S.W.2d at 408 . | 3 | 3 |
Federal Sign v. Texas Southern Universityred2 sentences2004See Travis County v. Pelzel & Assocs., Inc., 77 S.W.3d 246, 248 (Tex. 2002); Little-Tex Insulation Co., 39 S.W.3d at 594-95 ; Fed. Sign, 951 S.W.2d at 408 . 2004See Travis County v. Pelzel & Assocs., Inc. , 77 S.W.3d 246, 248 (Tex. 2002); Little-Tex Insulation Co. , 39 S.W.3d at 594-95; Fed. Sign , 951 S.W.2d at 408 . | 3 | 3 |
Bhalli v. Methodist Hospitalgreen1 sentence2015Bhalli v. Neill v. Pure Oil Co., 101 S.W.2d 402, 404 (Tex.Civ.App.– Methodist Hosp., 896 S.W.2d 207, 210 (Tex.App.–Houston Dallas 1937, writ ref'd); see alsoIn re Morgan Stanley & Co., [1st Dist.] 1995, writ denied); Lone Star Partners v. 293 S.W.3d 182, 193 (Tex.2009) (Hecht, J., dissenting) (“The NationsBank Corp., 893 S.W.2d 593 (Tex.App.–Texarkana rule in Texas and most other jurisdictions is that the contract 1994, writ denied); Herschbach v. City of Corpus Christi, 883 [of a party who lacked mental capacity] exists and can be S.W.2d 720 (Tex.App.–Corpus Christi 1994, writ denied). ratifi | 1 | 1 |
Neill v. Pure Oil Co.green1 sentence2015Bhalli v. Neill v. Pure Oil Co., 101 S.W.2d 402, 404 (Tex.Civ.App.– Methodist Hosp., 896 S.W.2d 207, 210 (Tex.App.–Houston Dallas 1937, writ ref'd); see alsoIn re Morgan Stanley & Co., [1st Dist.] 1995, writ denied); Lone Star Partners v. 293 S.W.3d 182, 193 (Tex.2009) (Hecht, J., dissenting) (“The NationsBank Corp., 893 S.W.2d 593 (Tex.App.–Texarkana rule in Texas and most other jurisdictions is that the contract 1994, writ denied); Herschbach v. City of Corpus Christi, 883 [of a party who lacked mental capacity] exists and can be S.W.2d 720 (Tex.App.–Corpus Christi 1994, writ denied). ratifi | 1 | 1 |
In Re Morgan Stanley & Co., Inc.green1 sentence2015Bhalli v. Neill v. Pure Oil Co., 101 S.W.2d 402, 404 (Tex.Civ.App.– Methodist Hosp., 896 S.W.2d 207, 210 (Tex.App.–Houston Dallas 1937, writ ref'd); see alsoIn re Morgan Stanley & Co., [1st Dist.] 1995, writ denied); Lone Star Partners v. 293 S.W.3d 182, 193 (Tex.2009) (Hecht, J., dissenting) (“The NationsBank Corp., 893 S.W.2d 593 (Tex.App.–Texarkana rule in Texas and most other jurisdictions is that the contract 1994, writ denied); Herschbach v. City of Corpus Christi, 883 [of a party who lacked mental capacity] exists and can be S.W.2d 720 (Tex.App.–Corpus Christi 1994, writ denied). ratifi | 1 | 1 |
City of Texarkana v. Cities of New Bostongreen2 sentences2007The trial court denied Texarkana’s motion to dismiss based on governmental immunity, and the court of appeals reversed as to the tort claims but affirmed as to the contract claims, holding that section 51.075 of the Texas Local Government Code waived Texarkana’s immunity from suit on contract. 141 S.W.3d 778, 782-89 (Tex.App.-Texarkana 2004). 2007The trial court denied Texarkana’s motion to dismiss based on governmental immunity, and the court of appeals reversed as to the tort claims but affirmed as to the contract claims, holding that section 51.075 of the Texas Local Government Code waived Texarkana’s immunity from suit on contract. 141 S.W.3d 778, 782-89 (Tex.App.-Texarkana 2004). | 1 | 1 |
Morris County Tax Appraisal District v. Nailgreen1 sentence1986See Morris County Tax Appraisal District v. Nail, 708 S.W.2d 473 (Tex.App. — Texarkana motion for rehearing overruled April 8, 1986), where the court held that Article 42.21 was "in the nature of statutes of limitations for the benefit of the appraisal districts.” | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Lone Star Partners v. NationsBank Corp.
green
1 sentence2015Bhalli v. Neill v. Pure Oil Co., 101 S.W.2d 402, 404 (Tex.Civ.App.– Methodist Hosp., 896 S.W.2d 207, 210 (Tex.App.–Houston Dallas 1937, writ ref'd); see alsoIn re Morgan Stanley & Co., [1st Dist.] 1995, writ denied); Lone Star Partners v. 293 S.W.3d 182, 193 (Tex.2009) (Hecht, J., dissenting) (“The NationsBank Corp., 893 S.W.2d 593 (Tex.App.–Texarkana rule in Texas and most other jurisdictions is that the contract 1994, writ denied); Herschbach v. City of Corpus Christi, 883 [of a party who lacked mental capacity] exists and can be S.W.2d 720 (Tex.App.–Corpus Christi 1994, writ denied). ratifi | 1 | 2015–2015 |