County committed manifest error (Virginia) · Go Syfert
← Virginia issues

County committed manifest error in Virginia

6 Virginia opinions name it 3 courts 1997–2019 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Virginia courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (3)

CaseFollowedCited
Fox v. Custisgreen
va · 1988 · cited in 1 Virginia opinions naming this issue, 2015–2015
1 sentence

2015See, e.g., Fox v. Custis, 236 Va. 69, 71 (1988).

11
City of Norfolk v. Snydergreen
va · 1933 · cited in 1 Virginia opinions naming this issue, 2015–2015
1 sentence

2015It first appears in Norfolk v. Snyder, 161 Va. 288, 292-93 (1933), in which the Court adopted it from a secondary source: ‘Conclusions of a board of commissioners will not be disturbed unless it appears that there has been a manifest error in the manner of making the estimate, or that evidence which should be controlling has been disregarded.

11
City of Harrisonburg v. Taubmangreen
va · 1971 · cited in 1 Virginia opinions naming this issue, 1997–1997
2 sentences

1997See. e.g., City of Harrisonburg v. Taubman, 212 Va. 28, 181 S.E.2d 654 (1971); Arlington County Bd. v. Ginsberg, 228 Va. 633 , 325 S.E.2d 348 (1985).

1997See. e.g., City of Harrisonburg v. Taubman, 212 Va. 28, 181 S.E.2d 654 (1971); Arlington County Bd. v. Ginsberg, 228 Va. 633 , 325 S.E.2d 348 (1985).

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Virginia. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (4)

CaseCitedYears
Keswick Club, L.P. v. County of Albemarle green
va · 2007
2 sentences

2010In our prior opinion regarding this matter, we held that the County's assessment was not entitled to a presumption of validity and that the taxpayer was only required to show that the County's assessment was erroneous, "not that the county committed manifest error or disregarded controlling evidence in making its assessment." Keswick, 273 Va. at 140-41 , 639 S.E.2d at 250 .

2010In our prior opinion regarding this matter, we held that the County's assessment was not entitled to a presumption of validity and that the taxpayer was only required to show that the County's assessment was erroneous, "not that the county committed manifest error or disregarded controlling evidence in making its assessment." Keswick, 273 Va. at 140-41 , 639 S.E.2d at 250 .

22010–2019
Board of Supervisors v. HCA Health Service of Virginia, Inc. green
va · 2000
2 sentences

2007Id. at 330 , 535 S.E.2d at 170 .

2007Id. at 330 , 535 S.E.2d at 170 .

12007–2007
Tidewater Psychiatric Institute, Inc. v. City of Virginia Beach green
va · 1998
2 sentences

2004Tidewater Psychiatric Institute, Inc. v. City of Virginia Beach, 256 Va. 136 , 140-41, 501 S.E.2d 761 , 763-64 (1998).

2004Tidewater Psychiatric Institute, Inc. v. City of Virginia Beach, 256 Va. 136 , 140-41, 501 S.E.2d 761 , 763-64 (1998).

12004–2004
Arlington County Board v. Ginsberg green
va · 1985
2 sentences

1997See. e.g., City of Harrisonburg v. Taubman, 212 Va. 28, 181 S.E.2d 654 (1971); Arlington County Bd. v. Ginsberg, 228 Va. 633 , 325 S.E.2d 348 (1985).

1997See. e.g., City of Harrisonburg v. Taubman, 212 Va. 28, 181 S.E.2d 654 (1971); Arlington County Bd. v. Ginsberg, 228 Va. 633 , 325 S.E.2d 348 (1985).

11997–1997

Statutes the citing opinions construe

VA § Va. Code Ann. § 58.1-3984 (5)

Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check