conflicting rule (Washington) · Go Syfert
← Washington issues

conflicting rule in Washington

6 Washington opinions name it 2 courts 1934–2025 2 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Washington courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (2)

CaseFollowedCited
State v. Hundleygreen
wash · 1995 · cited in 2 Washington opinions naming this issue, 2006–2006
2 sentences

2006See State v. Hundley, 126 Wash.2d 418, 420-21 , 895 P.2d 403 (1995) (conflicting test results).

2006See State v. Hundley, 126 Wn.2d 418, 420-21 , 895 P.2d 403 (1995) (conflicting test results).

22
cluster 760224green
ca9 · 1998 · cited in 1 Washington opinions naming this issue, 2020–2020
1 sentence

2020Cf. Bean v. Calderon, 163 F.3d 1073, 1082 (9th Cir. 1998) (once defense counsel reasonably chooses a defense theory, his duty to investigate a conflicting defense is at an end).

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Washington. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (5)

CaseCitedYears
State v. Barber green
wash · 2011
2 sentences

2025RCW 13.04.033(3). 5 Abrogated by State v. Barber, 170 Wn.2d 854 , 873 n.4, 248 P.3d 494 (2011). 9 For the current opinion, go to https://www.lexisnexis.com/clients/wareports/.

2024RCW 13.04.033(3). 5 Abrogated by State v. Barber, 170 Wn.2d 854 , 873 n.4, 248 P.3d 494 (2011). 9 In re Dep. of A.H., L.L., and S.O-W., No. 102558-1 This subsection’s opening sentence contains several undefined terms.

22024–2025
State v. Barber green
wash · 2011
2 sentences

2025RCW 13.04.033(3). 5 Abrogated by State v. Barber, 170 Wn.2d 854 , 873 n.4, 248 P.3d 494 (2011). 9 For the current opinion, go to https://www.lexisnexis.com/clients/wareports/.

2024RCW 13.04.033(3). 5 Abrogated by State v. Barber, 170 Wn.2d 854 , 873 n.4, 248 P.3d 494 (2011). 9 In re Dep. of A.H., L.L., and S.O-W., No. 102558-1 This subsection’s opening sentence contains several undefined terms.

22024–2025
Scarpelli v. Washington Water Power Co. green
wash · 1911
2 sentences

1934We might well conclude our own discussion of this branch of the case by saying that, despite the conflicting rule with respect to the extent and effect of a presumption of law, as laid down in Scarpelli v. Washington Water Power Co., 63 Wash. 18 , 114 Pac. 870 , Nicholson v. Neary, 77 Wash. 294 , 137 Pac. 492 , Welch v. Creech, 88 Wash. 429 , 153 Pac. 355 , L.

1934We might well conclude our own discussion of this branch of the case by saying that, despite the conflicting rule with respect to the extent and effect of a presumption of law, as laid down in Scarpelli v. Washington Water Power Co., 63 Wash. 18 , 114 Pac. 870 , Nicholson v. Neary, 77 Wash. 294 , 137 Pac. 492 , Welch v. Creech, 88 Wash. 429 , 153 Pac. 355 , L.

11934–1934
Welch v. Creech green
wash · 1915
2 sentences

1934We might well conclude our own discussion of this branch of the case by saying that, despite the conflicting rule with respect to the extent and effect of a presumption of law, as laid down in Scarpelli v. Washington Water Power Co., 63 Wash. 18 , 114 Pac. 870 , Nicholson v. Neary, 77 Wash. 294 , 137 Pac. 492 , Welch v. Creech, 88 Wash. 429 , 153 Pac. 355 , L.

1934We might well conclude our own discussion of this branch of the case by saying that, despite the conflicting rule with respect to the extent and effect of a presumption of law, as laid down in Scarpelli v. Washington Water Power Co., 63 Wash. 18 , 114 Pac. 870 , Nicholson v. Neary, 77 Wash. 294 , 137 Pac. 492 , Welch v. Creech, 88 Wash. 429 , 153 Pac. 355 , L.

11934–1934
Nicholson v. Neary neutral
wash · 1914
2 sentences

1934We might well conclude our own discussion of this branch of the case by saying that, despite the conflicting rule with respect to the extent and effect of a presumption of law, as laid down in Scarpelli v. Washington Water Power Co., 63 Wash. 18 , 114 Pac. 870 , Nicholson v. Neary, 77 Wash. 294 , 137 Pac. 492 , Welch v. Creech, 88 Wash. 429 , 153 Pac. 355 , L.

1934We might well conclude our own discussion of this branch of the case by saying that, despite the conflicting rule with respect to the extent and effect of a presumption of law, as laid down in Scarpelli v. Washington Water Power Co., 63 Wash. 18 , 114 Pac. 870 , Nicholson v. Neary, 77 Wash. 294 , 137 Pac. 492 , Welch v. Creech, 88 Wash. 429 , 153 Pac. 355 , L.

11934–1934

Where else courts name it

CA 38 (1870–2022) IL 24 (1895–2024) CT 12 (1948–2000) NY 11 (1861–2020) NJ 9 (1973–2026) PA 9 (1956–2024) ND 9 (1998–2021) KY 8 (1885–2025) OK 7 (1936–2025) MN 7 (1984–2016) GA 7 (1914–2014) TX 6 (1971–2022) CO 6 (1975–2014) OH 6 (1991–2020) WA 6 (1934–2025) NC 5 (1880–2015) DC 5 (1997–2016) NM 5 (1969–2025) AR 5 (1938–2018) IA 4 (1868–2016) MA 4 (1888–2013) ID 3 (1988–1992) AZ 3 (2009–2011) MI 3 (1959–2015) LA 3 (1973–1998) MO 3 (1923–1958) UT 2 (1989–1989) OR 2 (1929–1981) AK 2 (1983–1996) VT 2 (2007–2007) WV 2 (2012–2015) FL 2 (1977–2008)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check