Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
9 North Dakota opinions name it 1 courts 1998–2021 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by North Dakota courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Duncklee v. Willsgreen2 sentences2002However, N.D.R.Ct. 1.1 “makes Rule 3.2 apply to all motion practice unless there is a conflicting rule governing the matter.” Duncklee v. Wills, 542 N.W.2d 739, 741 (N.D.1996). 1998Duncklee v. Wills, 542 N.W.2d 739, 741 (N.D.1996). | 2 | 2 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in North Dakota. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Paxton v. Wiebe
green
2 sentences2020Paxton [v. Weibe], 1998 ND 169, ¶ 13 , 584 N.W.2d 72 . 2020Paxton [v. Weibe], 1998 ND 169, ¶ 13 , 584 N.W.2d 72 . | 6 | 2014–2020 |
Discover Bank v. Bolinske, Sr.
green
2 sentences2021Hageness v. Davis, 2017 ND 132, ¶ 9 , 896 N.W.2d 251 . 5 “Under N.D.R.Ct. 3.2(a)(3), a court may decide routine motions on briefs without holding a formal hearing, unless a party requests one.” Discover Bank v. Bolinske, 2020 ND 228, ¶ 7 , 950 N.W.2d 417 (quoting Desert Partners IV, L.P. v. Benson, 2014 ND 192, ¶ 18 , 855 N.W.2d 608 ). 2021Hageness v. Davis, 2017 ND 132, ¶ 9 , 896 N.W.2d 251 . 5 “Under N.D.R.Ct. 3.2(a)(3), a court may decide routine motions on briefs without holding a formal hearing, unless a party requests one.” Discover Bank v. Bolinske, 2020 ND 228, ¶ 7 , 950 N.W.2d 417 (quoting Desert Partners IV, L.P. v. Benson, 2014 ND 192, ¶ 18 , 855 N.W.2d 608 ). | 1 | 2021–2021 |
Hageness v. Davis
green
2 sentences2021Hageness v. Davis, 2017 ND 132, ¶ 9 , 896 N.W.2d 251 . 5 “Under N.D.R.Ct. 3.2(a)(3), a court may decide routine motions on briefs without holding a formal hearing, unless a party requests one.” Discover Bank v. Bolinske, 2020 ND 228, ¶ 7 , 950 N.W.2d 417 (quoting Desert Partners IV, L.P. v. Benson, 2014 ND 192, ¶ 18 , 855 N.W.2d 608 ). 2021Hageness v. Davis, 2017 ND 132, ¶ 9 , 896 N.W.2d 251 . 5 “Under N.D.R.Ct. 3.2(a)(3), a court may decide routine motions on briefs without holding a formal hearing, unless a party requests one.” Discover Bank v. Bolinske, 2020 ND 228, ¶ 7 , 950 N.W.2d 417 (quoting Desert Partners IV, L.P. v. Benson, 2014 ND 192, ¶ 18 , 855 N.W.2d 608 ). | 1 | 2021–2021 |
Desert Partners IV, L.P. v. Benson
green
2 sentences2021Hageness v. Davis, 2017 ND 132, ¶ 9 , 896 N.W.2d 251 . 5 “Under N.D.R.Ct. 3.2(a)(3), a court may decide routine motions on briefs without holding a formal hearing, unless a party requests one.” Discover Bank v. Bolinske, 2020 ND 228, ¶ 7 , 950 N.W.2d 417 (quoting Desert Partners IV, L.P. v. Benson, 2014 ND 192, ¶ 18 , 855 N.W.2d 608 ). 2021Hageness v. Davis, 2017 ND 132, ¶ 9 , 896 N.W.2d 251 . 5 “Under N.D.R.Ct. 3.2(a)(3), a court may decide routine motions on briefs without holding a formal hearing, unless a party requests one.” Discover Bank v. Bolinske, 2020 ND 228, ¶ 7 , 950 N.W.2d 417 (quoting Desert Partners IV, L.P. v. Benson, 2014 ND 192, ¶ 18 , 855 N.W.2d 608 ). | 1 | 2021–2021 |
Wagner v. Crossland Construction Company, Inc.
green
2 sentences2014Wagner v. Crossland Const. Co., 2013 ND 219, ¶ 5 , 840 N.W.2d 81 . [IT 18] Rule 3.2, N.D.R.Ct., applies to all motion practices, unless a conflicting rule governs the matter. 2014Wagner v. Crossland Const. Co., 2013 ND 219, ¶ 5 , 840 N.W.2d 81 . [IT 18] Rule 3.2, N.D.R.Ct., applies to all motion practices, unless a conflicting rule governs the matter. | 1 | 2014–2014 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.