guarantee clause (Washington) · Go Syfert
← Washington issues

guarantee clause in Washington

6 Washington opinions name it 2 courts 1991–2007 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Washington courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (0)

CaseFollowedCited
No positive-treatment citations attached to this issue in Washington.

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Washington. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (7)

CaseCitedYears
In Re Initiative Petition No. 348, State Question No. 640 green
okla · 1992
2 sentences

2007In re Initiative Petition No. 348, 820 P.2d 772 (Okla. 1991).

2007In re Initiative Petition No. 348, 820 P.2d 772 (Okla. 1991).

21997–2007
State v. Montez green
or · 1990
2 sentences

2007Thus, the Oregon Supreme Court in State v. Montez, 309 Or. 564 , 789 P.2d 1352 (1990), rejected a Guarantee Clause challenge to that state's death penalty initiative after finding the issue to be justiciable. [2] The Oklahoma Supreme Court has likewise held that enacting laws through initiatives and referenda does not abolish or destroy the republican form of government.

2007Thus, the Oregon Supreme Court in State v. Montez, 309 Or. 564 , 789 P.2d 1352 (1990), rejected a Guarantee Clause challenge to that state's death penalty initiative after finding the issue to be justiciable. [2] The Oklahoma Supreme Court has likewise held that enacting laws through initiatives and referenda does not abolish or destroy the republican form of government.

21997–2007
Washington v. Finch green
scotus · 1999
2 sentences

2003State v. Finch, 137 Wash.2d 792, 844 , 975 P.2d 967 , cert. denied, 528 U.S. 922 , 120 S.Ct. 285 , 145 L.Ed.2d 239 (1999).

2003State v. Finch, 137 Wn.2d 792, 844 , 975 P.2d 967 , cert. denied, 528 U.S. 922 (1999).

22003–2003
State v. Finch green
wash · 1999
2 sentences

2003State v. Finch, 137 Wn.2d 792, 844 , 975 P.2d 967 , cert. denied, 528 U.S. 922 (1999).

2003State v. Finch, 137 Wn.2d 792, 844 , 975 P.2d 967 , cert. denied, 528 U.S. 922 (1999).

22003–2003
Lawson v. Boeing Company green
washctapp · 1990
1 sentence

1997App. 854 , 701 P.2d 529 (1985). 34 Lawson v. Boeing Co., 58 Wn.

11997–1997
Spurrell v. Block green
washctapp · 1985
2 sentences

1997App. 854 , 701 P.2d 529 (1985). 34 Lawson v. Boeing Co., 58 Wn.

1997In such cases the courts may perhaps tend to look for more in the way of outrage as a guarantee that the claim is genuine; but if the enormity of the outrage carries conviction that there has in fact been severe emotional distress, bodily harm is not required. 32 Restatement (Second) of Torts § 46 cmt. j. 33 Spurrell v. Block, 40 Wn.

11997–1997
Anderson v. Creighton green
scotus · 1987
1 sentence

1991Such an approach, in sum, would destroy "the balance that our cases strike between the interests in vindication of citizens' constitutional rights and in public officials' effective performance of their duties," by making it impossible for officials "reasonably [to] anticipate when their conduct may give rise to liability for damages." (Citation omitted.) Anderson v. Creighton, 483 U.S. at 639 .

11991–1991

Where else courts name it

LA 47 (1978–2025) NY 28 (1965–2017) NJ 17 (1967–2020) CA 14 (1929–2018) IL 9 (1905–2018) NC 6 (1917–2021) OH 6 (1976–2009) PA 6 (1925–2020) WA 6 (1991–2007) OR 5 (1968–1997) ID 4 (1969–2016) CT 4 (1993–1999) MO 4 (2009–2012) DC 4 (1978–2011) CO 4 (1974–1990) NV 3 (2010–2021) AR 3 (1974–2018) OK 3 (1980–1997) AK 2 (1977–2020) MT 2 (2020–2020) IA 2 (1987–1991) MI 2 (1984–1987) WI 2 (1985–1994) MD 2 (1985–2017) IN 2 (1996–1999) MS 2 (1992–1996) FL 2 (1977–2016) MA 2 (2007–2015)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check