side bar (Washington) · Go Syfert
← Washington issues

side bar in Washington

6 Washington opinions name it 1 courts 2014–2016 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Washington courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (1)

CaseFollowedCited
State v. Lovegreen
washctapp · 2013 · cited in 4 Washington opinions naming this issue, 2014–2015
2 sentences

2015App. 911, 920 , 309 P.3d 1209 (2013), review granted, 181 Wn.2d 1029 , 340 P.3d 228 (2015) that the exercise of peremptory challenges in a side bar conference does not violate the public trial right.

2014App. 911 , 309 P. 3d 1209 ( 2013), we hold that the trial court did not violate Dunn' s right to a public trial by allowing the attorneys to exercise peremptory challenges during a side bar.

14

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Washington. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (4)

CaseCitedYears
State v. Smith green
wash · 2014
1 sentence

2016While it would have been preferable for the court to have ensured the side bar was recorded, see id. at 518 , we are satisfied the present circumstances do not permit Mr. Crowder's public trial challenge.

12016–2016
State v. Webb green
washctapp · 2014
1 sentence

2015State v. Webb, 183 Wn.

12015–2015
State v. McFarland green
wash · 1995
1 sentence

2014McFarland, 127 Wn.2d at 335 : Because there is no evidence in the record confirming that Fitzgerald was not present at the side bar, the record is insufficient to review Fitzgerald' s argument that the trial court violated his right to be present.

12014–2014
State v. Dunn green
washctapp · 2014
1 sentence

2014App. at , 321 P. 3d at 1285 ; see also State v. Love, 176 Wn.

12014–2014

Where else courts name it

PA 17 (1828–2021) TX 15 (1970–2019) MA 15 (1915–2018) FL 14 (1975–2018) NY 14 (1958–1999) IL 14 (1977–2026) CA 12 (1875–2020) OH 12 (2003–2024) DE 6 (1917–2024) WA 6 (2014–2016) NJ 5 (1908–2006) UT 4 (1994–2025) WI 4 (1965–2026) RI 4 (1982–2013) MD 4 (1956–2011) LA 3 (1998–2011) NC 2 (1953–1967) TN 2 (1969–1969) AL 2 (1927–1932)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check