Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 Wisconsin opinions name it 1 courts 1984–2019 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Wisconsin courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Larsengreen2 sentences2019A trial court erroneously exercises its sentencing discretion if it "failed to state on the record the material factors which influenced its decision or if it gave too much weight to one factor in the face of other contravening considerations." State v. Larsen , 141 Wis. 2d 412 , 428, 415 N.W.2d 535 (Ct. App. 1987). ¶33 A trial court must explain its reasons for imposing a particular sentence on the record. 2019A trial court erroneously exercises its sentencing discretion if it "failed to state on the record the material factors which influenced its decision or if it gave too much weight to one factor in the face of other contravening considerations." State v. Larsen , 141 Wis. 2d 412 , 428, 415 N.W.2d 535 (Ct. App. 1987). ¶33 A trial court must explain its reasons for imposing a particular sentence on the record. | 1 | 2 |
State v. Kruegergreen2 sentences2004State v. Lewandowski , 122 Wis. 2d 759, 763 , 364 N.W.2d 550 (Ct. App. 1985). ¶30 The erroneous exercise of discretion "might be found if the trial court failed to state on the record the material factors [that] influenced its decision, gave too much weight to one factor in the face of contravening considerations, or relied on irrelevant or immaterial factors." Krueger , 119 Wis. 2d at 337-38 . 1987State v. Krueger, 119 Wis. 2d 327, 337-38 , 351 N.W.2d 738, 744 (Ct. App. 1984). | 1 | 2 |
State v. Curbello-Rodriguezgreen2 sentences1988State v. Curbello-Rodriguez, 119 Wis. 2d 414, 433-34 , 351 N.W.2d 758, 767-68 (Ct. App. 1984). 1988State v. Curbello-Rodriguez, 119 Wis. 2d 414, 433-34 , 351 N.W.2d 758, 767-68 (Ct. App. 1984). | 1 | 1 |
Harris v. Stategreen2 sentences1984Harris v. State, 75 Wis. 2d 513, 518 , 250 N.W.2d 7, 10 (1977). 1984Harris v. State, 75 Wis. 2d 513, 518 , 250 N.W.2d 7, 10 (1977). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Wisconsin. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Hall
green
2 sentences2019State v. Hall , 2002 WI App 108 , ¶¶9-18, 255 Wis. 2d 662 , 648 N.W.2d 41 . 2019State v. Hall , 2002 WI App 108 , ¶¶9-18, 255 Wis. 2d 662 , 648 N.W.2d 41 . | 1 | 2019–2019 |
State v. Lewandowski
green
2 sentences2004State v. Lewandowski , 122 Wis. 2d 759, 763 , 364 N.W.2d 550 (Ct. App. 1985). ¶30 The erroneous exercise of discretion "might be found if the trial court failed to state on the record the material factors [that] influenced its decision, gave too much weight to one factor in the face of contravening considerations, or relied on irrelevant or immaterial factors." Krueger , 119 Wis. 2d at 337-38 . 2004State v. Lewandowski , 122 Wis. 2d 759, 763 , 364 N.W.2d 550 (Ct. App. 1985). ¶30 The erroneous exercise of discretion "might be found if the trial court failed to state on the record the material factors [that] influenced its decision, gave too much weight to one factor in the face of contravening considerations, or relied on irrelevant or immaterial factors." Krueger , 119 Wis. 2d at 337-38 . | 1 | 2004–2004 |