fourth assignment error (West Virginia) · Go Syfert
← West Virginia issues

fourth assignment error in West Virginia

6 West Virginia opinions name it 1 courts 1893–2020 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by West Virginia courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (1)

CaseFollowedCited
State v. Kinggreen
wva · 1999 · cited in 1 West Virginia opinions naming this issue, 2014–2014
2 sentences

2014Turning to the fourth assignment of error (in which petitioner argues that he was not afforded a hearing on his motion for alternative sentence agreement and, possibly, his motion for reconsideration of sentence), we begin with State v. King, 205 W.Va. 422, 425 , 518 S.E.2d 663, 666 (1999), in which we noted that a circuit court did not abuse its discretion in declining to conduct an additional, unnecessary hearing prior to denying a defendant’s Rule 35 motion.

2014Turning to the fourth assignment of error (in which petitioner argues that he was not afforded a hearing on his motion for alternative sentence agreement and, possibly, his motion for reconsideration of sentence), we begin with State v. King, 205 W.Va. 422, 425 , 518 S.E.2d 663, 666 (1999), in which we noted that a circuit court did not abuse its discretion in declining to conduct an additional, unnecessary hearing prior to denying a defendant’s Rule 35 motion.

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in West Virginia. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (5)

CaseCitedYears
State v. Edward Charles L. green
wva · 1990
1 sentence

2020Va. 641 , 398 S.E.2d 123 (1990). 2 Petitioner additionally asserts a fourth assignment of error alleging that the circuit court erred in denying her motion to transfer the case to the State of Tennessee.

12020–2020
State v. LaRock green
wva · 1996
1 sentence

2014This Court has previously stated that “issues . . . mentioned only in passing but are not supported with pertinent authority are not considered on appeal.” State v. LaRock, 196 W.

12014–2014
State v. Atkins green
wva · 1979
2 sentences

1986Irrespective of the propriety of this admission, however, as this Court held in Syllabus Point 2 of State v. Atkins, 163 W.Va. 502 , 261 S.E.2d 55 (1979): Where improper evidence of a non-constitutional nature is introduced by the State in a criminal trial, the test to determine if the error is harmless is: (1) the inadmissible evidence must be removed from the State’s case and a determination made as to whether the remaining evidence is sufficient to convince impartial minds of the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt; (2) if the remaining evidence is found to be insufficient, the erro

1986Irrespective of the propriety of this admission, however, as this Court held in Syllabus Point 2 of State v. Atkins, 163 W.Va. 502 , 261 S.E.2d 55 (1979): Where improper evidence of a non-constitutional nature is introduced by the State in a criminal trial, the test to determine if the error is harmless is: (1) the inadmissible evidence must be removed from the State’s case and a determination made as to whether the remaining evidence is sufficient to convince impartial minds of the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt; (2) if the remaining evidence is found to be insufficient, the erro

11986–1986
Jones v. Reid Adm'r green
· 1878
1 sentence

1897Upon this question see Jones v. Reid's Adm'r, 12 W.

11897–1897
Carrico v. W. Va. Cent. & Pa. R'y. Co. neutral
wva · 1891
1 sentence

1893This question, however, has been settled by this Court in the case of Carrico v. Railway Co., 35 W.

11893–1893

Where else courts name it

OH 586 (1943–2026) TX 29 (1888–2015) OK 29 (1905–1988) TN 24 (1927–1976) OR 23 (1933–2025) PA 19 (1896–1992) VA 19 (1901–2026) LA 18 (1928–2021) NE 16 (1886–2014) NC 8 (1895–2009) WA 7 (1962–2019) AL 7 (1853–1956) IN 7 (1873–1940) WV 6 (1893–2020) FL 5 (1892–1939) MA 5 (1928–1963) MS 4 (1955–1997) ID 3 (1910–1957) AZ 3 (1925–1966) CA 3 (1880–1960) MO 2 (1914–1966) WI 2 (1899–1973) IL 2 (1911–1949) KS 2 (1882–1897) PR 2 (1928–1956)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check