Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 Indiana opinions name it 2 courts 1873–1940 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Indiana courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No positive-treatment citations attached to this issue in Indiana. | ||
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Indiana. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Smith v. James
green
2 sentences1940Smith v. James (1891), 131 Ind. 131 , 30 N. E. 902 . *362 The fourth assignment of error to the effect that the judgment and decision of the court is contrary to law is not sufficient either as a separate assignment of error or as a ground for a new trial. 1940Smith v. James (1891), 131 Ind. 131 , 30 N. E. 902 . *362 The fourth assignment of error to the effect that the judgment and decision of the court is contrary to law is not sufficient either as a separate assignment of error or as a ground for a new trial. | 1 | 1940–1940 |
Haynes v. Switzer Real Estate Corp.
green
2 sentences1937Haynes v. Switzer Real Estate Corp. (1935), 100 Ind. App. 410 , 196 N. E. 133 ; McCord, et al. v. Chief Anderson Assn. 1937Haynes v. Switzer Real Estate Corp. (1935), 100 Ind. App. 410 , 196 N. E. 133 ; McCord, et al. v. Chief Anderson Assn. | 1 | 1937–1937 |
Borders v. Williams
green
2 sentences1925Borders v. Williams (1900), 155 Ind. 36 , 57 N. E. 527 . *547 *546 The fourth assignment of error is, that the court *547 erred in its conclusion of law No. 7, in holding that five ballots were illegal and void and should not be counted, for the reason that they were absent •voters’ ballots and did not have the impression of the official seal of the clerk of the Blackford Circuit Court. 1925Borders v. Williams (1900), 155 Ind. 36 , 57 N. E. 527 . *547 *546 The fourth assignment of error is, that the court *547 erred in its conclusion of law No. 7, in holding that five ballots were illegal and void and should not be counted, for the reason that they were absent •voters’ ballots and did not have the impression of the official seal of the clerk of the Blackford Circuit Court. | 1 | 1925–1925 |
Anson v. Connett
green
1 sentence1924Bass v. State (1918), 188 Ind. 21 , 120 N. E. 657 . *337 *336 By his proposition addressed to the fourth assignment of error, appellant raises the question of the constitutionality of the act, in violation of Art. 4, §19, of *337 the Constitution of Indiana, upon which the affidavit which charges the crime is based, and makes the point, that the act has reference to the possession and use of stills for the manufacture of intoxicating liquor, but that such use is not specifically mentioned in the title of the act; and that stills may be for other purposes than distilling intoxicating liquor; fr | 1 | 1924–1924 |
Bass v. State
green
1 sentence1924Bass v. State (1918), 188 Ind. 21 , 120 N. E. 657 . *337 *336 By his proposition addressed to the fourth assignment of error, appellant raises the question of the constitutionality of the act, in violation of Art. 4, §19, of *337 the Constitution of Indiana, upon which the affidavit which charges the crime is based, and makes the point, that the act has reference to the possession and use of stills for the manufacture of intoxicating liquor, but that such use is not specifically mentioned in the title of the act; and that stills may be for other purposes than distilling intoxicating liquor; fr | 1 | 1924–1924 |
Farman v. Chamberlain
neutral
1 sentence1897It is pleaded in bar of the action and as it does not answer the entire complaint, the demurrer should have been sustained, Farman v. Chamberlain, supra. The fourth assignment of error is the sustaining of the demurrer to the fourth paragraph of reply to the third paragraph of answer of appellee. | 1 | 1897–1897 |
New Albany & Salem Railroad v. O'Daily
green
1 sentence1879See the following cases: Cubberly v. Wine, 13 Ind. 353 ; Wainscott v. Silvers, 13 Ind. 497 ; Piel v. Brayer, 30 Ind. 332 ; Knarr v. Conaway, 42 Ind. 260 . | 1 | 1879–1879 |
Doron v. Cosby
neutral
1 sentence1879See the following cases: Cubberly v. Wine, 13 Ind. 353 ; Wainscott v. Silvers, 13 Ind. 497 ; Piel v. Brayer, 30 Ind. 332 ; Knarr v. Conaway, 42 Ind. 260 . | 1 | 1879–1879 |
Piel v. Brayer
neutral
1 sentence1879See the following cases: Cubberly v. Wine, 13 Ind. 353 ; Wainscott v. Silvers, 13 Ind. 497 ; Piel v. Brayer, 30 Ind. 332 ; Knarr v. Conaway, 42 Ind. 260 . | 1 | 1879–1879 |
Knarr v. Conaway
green
1 sentence1879See the following cases: Cubberly v. Wine, 13 Ind. 353 ; Wainscott v. Silvers, 13 Ind. 497 ; Piel v. Brayer, 30 Ind. 332 ; Knarr v. Conaway, 42 Ind. 260 . | 1 | 1879–1879 |
Wesley v. Milford
neutral
1 sentence1873In Wesley v. Milford supra, it was held, that on appeal from the superior court, it could not be assigned for error here, as it could on appeal from the circuit of common pleas court, that the complaint did not contain facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action; but it was further held, that the question as to the sufficiency of the complaint might be presented in the general term, although it was not presented or raised in any way in the special term, and that such question might be raised in the general term by an assignment of error that the complaint did not contain facts sufficient | 1 | 1873–1873 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.