well-founded claim (Alabama) · Go Syfert
← Alabama issues

well-founded claim in Alabama

5 Alabama opinions name it 1 courts 1920–2002 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Alabama courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (0)

CaseFollowedCited
No positive-treatment citations attached to this issue in Alabama.

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Alabama. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (4)

CaseCitedYears
Wilko v. Swan red
scotus · 1953
2 sentences

1987Absent a well-founded claim that an arbitration agreement resulted from the sort of fraud or excessive economic power that 'would provide grounds "for the revocation of any contract," ' ibid., the Arbitration Act 'provides no basis for disfavoring agreements to arbitrate statutory *Page 1370 claims by skewing the otherwise hospitable inquiry into arbitrability.' Ibid.

1987Absent a well-founded claim that an arbitration agreement resulted from the sort of fraud or excessive economic power that ‘would provide grounds “for the revocation of any contract.” ’ ibid., the Arbitration Act ‘provides no basis for disfavoring agreements to arbitrate statutory claims by skewing the otherwise hospitable inquiry into arbitrability.’ Ibid.

31987–1987
McBrayer v. Hokes Bluff Auto Parts green
alacivapp · 1996
1 sentence

2002However, `since the Alabama Rules of Civil Procedure are modeled on the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, federal decisions are highly persuasive when we are called upon to construe the Alabama rules.' McBrayer v. Hokes Bluff Auto Parts , 685 So.2d 763 , 765 (Ala.Civ.App. 1996) (quoting City of Birmingham v. City of Fairfield , 396 So.2d 692 , 696 (Ala. 1981)).

12002–2002
City of Birmingham v. City of Fairfield green
ala · 1981
1 sentence

2002However, `since the Alabama Rules of Civil Procedure are modeled on the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, federal decisions are highly persuasive when we are called upon to construe the Alabama rules.' McBrayer v. Hokes Bluff Auto Parts , 685 So.2d 763 , 765 (Ala.Civ.App. 1996) (quoting City of Birmingham v. City of Fairfield , 396 So.2d 692 , 696 (Ala. 1981)).

12002–2002
Everage v. State neutral
ala · 1896
1 sentence

1920Since the defendant was shown to have been present on these occasions, the well-founded doctrine illustrated in Everage v. State, 113 Ala. 102 , 21 South. 404 , relied on as the basis of this particular objection, was not applicable, and the trial court did not err with respect to that doctrine >vhen referred to those particular occasions.

11920–1920

Statutes the citing opinions construe

USC § 9u.s.c.1 (3) USC § 9u.s.c.2 (3)

Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.

Where else courts name it

TX 28 (1925–2022) IN 28 (1971–2020) MO 6 (1905–2017) MS 6 (2000–2005) NY 6 (1965–1996) IL 6 (1899–1989) AL 5 (1920–2002) TN 4 (1946–2019) CT 3 (2005–2021) OH 3 (1999–2005) NV 3 (1979–2019) PA 3 (1909–1989) OK 3 (1985–1991) MI 3 (1911–2011) NE 3 (1941–2002) NM 2 (2015–2022) AR 2 (2003–2012) GA 2 (2019–2020) NC 2 (1891–2004) KY 2 (1936–2005) CA 2 (1951–2024) CO 2 (1990–2016) LA 2 (1997–2018)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check