well-founded claim (Mississippi) · Go Syfert
← Mississippi issues

well-founded claim in Mississippi

6 Mississippi opinions name it 1 courts 2000–2005 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Mississippi courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (0)

CaseFollowedCited
No positive-treatment citations attached to this issue in Mississippi.

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Mississippi. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (2)

CaseCitedYears
Shearson/American Express Inc. v. McMahon green
scotus · 1987
2 sentences

2003"Absent a well-founded claim that an arbitration agreement resulted from the sort of fraud or excessive economic power that `would provide grounds for the revocation of any contract,' the Arbitration Act `provides no basis for disfavoring agreements to arbitrate statutory claims by skewing the otherwise hospitable inquiry into arbitrability.'" Id. (citations omitted). "[Q]uestions of arbitrability must be addressed with a healthy regard for the federal policy favoring arbitration ...

2002"Absent a well-founded claim that an arbitration agreement resulted from the sort of fraud or excessive economic power that `would provide grounds for the revocation of any contract,' the Arbitration Act `provides no basis for disfavoring agreements to arbitrate statutory claims by skewing the otherwise hospitable inquiry into arbitrability.'" Id. (citations omitted). "[Q]uestions of arbitrability must be addressed with a healthy regard for the federal policy favoring arbitration ...

42000–2003
Mitsubishi Motors Corp. v. Soler Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc. green
scotus · 1985
2 sentences

2005Exp., Inc., 482 U.S. at 226, 107 S.Ct. at 2337 (citing Mitsubishi Motors Corp. v. Soler Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc., 473 U.S. 614, 627 , 105 S.Ct. 3346, 3354 , 87 L.Ed.2d 444 (1985)).

2005Exp., Inc., 482 U.S. at 226, 107 S.Ct. at 2337 (citing Mitsubishi Motors Corp. v. Soler Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc., 473 U.S. 614, 627 , 105 S.Ct. 3346, 3354 , 87 L.Ed.2d 444 (1985)).

22004–2005

Statutes the citing opinions construe

USC § 9u.s.c.1 (6) USC § 9u.s.c.2 (6) MS § Miss. Code Ann. § 75-2-302 (4)

Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.

Where else courts name it

IN 28 (1971–2020) TX 28 (1925–2022) IL 6 (1899–1989) MS 6 (2000–2005) NY 6 (1965–1996) MO 6 (1905–2017) AL 5 (1920–2002) NV 5 (1916–2019) TN 4 (1946–2019) PA 3 (1909–1989) OH 3 (1999–2005) OK 3 (1985–1991) NE 3 (1941–2002) CT 3 (2005–2021) MI 3 (1911–2011) AR 2 (2003–2012) GA 2 (2019–2020) CA 2 (1951–2024) SC 2 (1947–2015) LA 2 (1997–2018) NC 2 (1891–2004) KY 2 (1936–2005) NM 2 (2015–2022) CO 2 (1990–2016)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check