Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Arizona opinions name it 2 courts 1947–2016 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Arizona courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Copeland v. ARIZONA VET. MEM. COLISEUMgreen2 sentences2016Copeland, 176 Ariz. at 89, 859 P.2d at 199. 2016Copeland, 176 Ariz. at 89, 859 P.2d at 199. | 1 | 1 |
Almarez v. Superior Courtgreen2 sentences1993See, e.g., Almarez v. Superior Court, 146 Ariz. 189, 190 , 704 P.2d 830, 831 (App.1985). 5 . 1993See, e.g., Almarez v. Superior Court, 146 Ariz. 189, 190 , 704 P.2d 830, 831 (App.1985). 5 . | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Arizona. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Hirsch v. National Van Lines, Inc.
green
2 sentences1985With regard to the first element, it is clear that “carelessness is not synonymous with excusable neglect.” Hirsch v. National Van Lines, supra, 136 Ariz. at 309 , 666 P.2d at 54 . 1985With regard to the first element, it is clear that “carelessness is not synonymous with excusable neglect.” Hirsch v. National Van Lines, supra, 136 Ariz. at 309 , 666 P.2d at 54 . | 1 | 1985–1985 |
Arizona Mining & Trading Co. v. Benton
green
2 sentences1969Hendrie Buick Co. v. Mack, supra; Arizona Mining & Trading Co. v. Benton, 12 Ariz. 373 , 100 P. 952 (1909). 1969Hendrie Buick Co. v. Mack, supra; Arizona Mining & Trading Co. v. Benton, 12 Ariz. 373 , 100 P. 952 (1909). | 1 | 1969–1969 |
Swisshelm Gold Silver Co. v. Farwell
green
2 sentences1947Though we are well aware of the presumption in favor of the validity of the findings of the trial court, we believe defendant’s affidavit fulfills the requirements of showing both surprise, Brown v. Beck, 64 Ariz. 299 , 169 P.2d 855 , and the existence of a meritorious defense, Security Trust & Savings Bank v. Moseley, 27 Ariz. 562 , 234 P. 828 ; Beltran v. Roll, 39 Ariz. 417 , 7 P.2d 248 ; Swisshelm Gold Silver Co. v. Farwell, 59 Ariz. 162 , 124 P.2d 544 , which necessitates setting aside the default judgment and permitting the defendant to answer in order that a trial may be had upon the mer 1947Though we are well aware of the presumption in favor of the validity of the findings of the trial court, we believe defendant’s affidavit fulfills the requirements of showing both surprise, Brown v. Beck, 64 Ariz. 299 , 169 P.2d 855 , and the existence of a meritorious defense, Security Trust & Savings Bank v. Moseley, 27 Ariz. 562 , 234 P. 828 ; Beltran v. Roll, 39 Ariz. 417 , 7 P.2d 248 ; Swisshelm Gold Silver Co. v. Farwell, 59 Ariz. 162 , 124 P.2d 544 , which necessitates setting aside the default judgment and permitting the defendant to answer in order that a trial may be had upon the mer | 1 | 1947–1947 |
Beltran v. Roll
neutral
2 sentences1947Though we are well aware of the presumption in favor of the validity of the findings of the trial court, we believe defendant’s affidavit fulfills the requirements of showing both surprise, Brown v. Beck, 64 Ariz. 299 , 169 P.2d 855 , and the existence of a meritorious defense, Security Trust & Savings Bank v. Moseley, 27 Ariz. 562 , 234 P. 828 ; Beltran v. Roll, 39 Ariz. 417 , 7 P.2d 248 ; Swisshelm Gold Silver Co. v. Farwell, 59 Ariz. 162 , 124 P.2d 544 , which necessitates setting aside the default judgment and permitting the defendant to answer in order that a trial may be had upon the mer 1947Though we are well aware of the presumption in favor of the validity of the findings of the trial court, we believe defendant’s affidavit fulfills the requirements of showing both surprise, Brown v. Beck, 64 Ariz. 299 , 169 P.2d 855 , and the existence of a meritorious defense, Security Trust & Savings Bank v. Moseley, 27 Ariz. 562 , 234 P. 828 ; Beltran v. Roll, 39 Ariz. 417 , 7 P.2d 248 ; Swisshelm Gold Silver Co. v. Farwell, 59 Ariz. 162 , 124 P.2d 544 , which necessitates setting aside the default judgment and permitting the defendant to answer in order that a trial may be had upon the mer | 1 | 1947–1947 |
Security Trust & Savings Bank v. Moseley
neutral
2 sentences1947Though we are well aware of the presumption in favor of the validity of the findings of the trial court, we believe defendant’s affidavit fulfills the requirements of showing both surprise, Brown v. Beck, 64 Ariz. 299 , 169 P.2d 855 , and the existence of a meritorious defense, Security Trust & Savings Bank v. Moseley, 27 Ariz. 562 , 234 P. 828 ; Beltran v. Roll, 39 Ariz. 417 , 7 P.2d 248 ; Swisshelm Gold Silver Co. v. Farwell, 59 Ariz. 162 , 124 P.2d 544 , which necessitates setting aside the default judgment and permitting the defendant to answer in order that a trial may be had upon the mer 1947Though we are well aware of the presumption in favor of the validity of the findings of the trial court, we believe defendant’s affidavit fulfills the requirements of showing both surprise, Brown v. Beck, 64 Ariz. 299 , 169 P.2d 855 , and the existence of a meritorious defense, Security Trust & Savings Bank v. Moseley, 27 Ariz. 562 , 234 P. 828 ; Beltran v. Roll, 39 Ariz. 417 , 7 P.2d 248 ; Swisshelm Gold Silver Co. v. Farwell, 59 Ariz. 162 , 124 P.2d 544 , which necessitates setting aside the default judgment and permitting the defendant to answer in order that a trial may be had upon the mer | 1 | 1947–1947 |
Brown v. Beck
green
2 sentences1947Though we are well aware of the presumption in favor of the validity of the findings of the trial court, we believe defendant’s affidavit fulfills the requirements of showing both surprise, Brown v. Beck, 64 Ariz. 299 , 169 P.2d 855 , and the existence of a meritorious defense, Security Trust & Savings Bank v. Moseley, 27 Ariz. 562 , 234 P. 828 ; Beltran v. Roll, 39 Ariz. 417 , 7 P.2d 248 ; Swisshelm Gold Silver Co. v. Farwell, 59 Ariz. 162 , 124 P.2d 544 , which necessitates setting aside the default judgment and permitting the defendant to answer in order that a trial may be had upon the mer 1947Though we are well aware of the presumption in favor of the validity of the findings of the trial court, we believe defendant’s affidavit fulfills the requirements of showing both surprise, Brown v. Beck, 64 Ariz. 299 , 169 P.2d 855 , and the existence of a meritorious defense, Security Trust & Savings Bank v. Moseley, 27 Ariz. 562 , 234 P. 828 ; Beltran v. Roll, 39 Ariz. 417 , 7 P.2d 248 ; Swisshelm Gold Silver Co. v. Farwell, 59 Ariz. 162 , 124 P.2d 544 , which necessitates setting aside the default judgment and permitting the defendant to answer in order that a trial may be had upon the mer | 1 | 1947–1947 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.