Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 California opinions name it 2 courts 2011–2025 3 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by California courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Perry v. Thomasgreen1 sentence2011(See Perry, supra, 482 U.S. at p. 492, fn. 9 .) A public policy based solely on the supposed superiority of an administrative forum over arbitration could no more survive FAA preemption than could a policy based on the supposed superiority of a judicial forum. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in California. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Lamps Plus, Inc. v. Varela
green
2 sentences2021Santa Ana relies on 9 Lamps Plus, Inc. v. Varela (2019) 587 U.S. ___ [ 139 S.Ct. 1407 , 203 L.Ed.2d 626 ] (Lamps Plus), Epic Systems, supra, 584 U.S. ___ [ 138 S.Ct. 1612 ], and Kindred Nursing Centers L.P. v. Clark (2017) 581 U.S. ___ [ 137 S.Ct. 1421 , 197 L.Ed.2d 806 ] (Kindred Nursing).) We are not persuaded. 2021Shipt relies on Epic Systems, supra, 584 U.S. ___ [ 138 S.Ct. 1612 ] and Lamps Plus, Inc. v. Varela (2019) 587 U.S. ___ [ 139 S.Ct. 1407, 1412 , 203 L.Ed.2d 626 ] (Lamps Plus). | 3 | 2019–2021 |
Epic Systems Corp. v. Lewis
green
2 sentences2021Santa Ana relies on 9 Lamps Plus, Inc. v. Varela (2019) 587 U.S. ___ [ 139 S.Ct. 1407 , 203 L.Ed.2d 626 ] (Lamps Plus), Epic Systems, supra, 584 U.S. ___ [ 138 S.Ct. 1612 ], and Kindred Nursing Centers L.P. v. Clark (2017) 581 U.S. ___ [ 137 S.Ct. 1421 , 197 L.Ed.2d 806 ] (Kindred Nursing).) We are not persuaded. 2021Shipt relies on Epic Systems, supra, 584 U.S. ___ [ 138 S.Ct. 1612 ] and Lamps Plus, Inc. v. Varela (2019) 587 U.S. ___ [ 139 S.Ct. 1407, 1412 , 203 L.Ed.2d 626 ] (Lamps Plus). | 2 | 2021–2021 |
Volt Info. Sciences, Inc. v. Bd. of Trustees of Leland Stanford Jr. U.
green
1 sentence2025(Volt, supra, 489 U.S. at p. 471 .) Upholding the provision, the court observed: “There is no federal policy favoring arbitration under a certain set of procedural rules.” (Id. at p. 476.) The court reasoned that since 1 As the Court of Appeal has observed, “[t]hose state laws will, by definition, be arbitration specific. | 1 | 2025–2025 |
Kindred Nursing Ctrs. Ltd. P'ship v. Clark
green
2 sentences2021Santa Ana relies on 9 Lamps Plus, Inc. v. Varela (2019) 587 U.S. ___ [ 139 S.Ct. 1407 , 203 L.Ed.2d 626 ] (Lamps Plus), Epic Systems, supra, 584 U.S. ___ [ 138 S.Ct. 1612 ], and Kindred Nursing Centers L.P. v. Clark (2017) 581 U.S. ___ [ 137 S.Ct. 1421 , 197 L.Ed.2d 806 ] (Kindred Nursing).) We are not persuaded. 2021Santa Ana relies on 9 Lamps Plus, Inc. v. Varela (2019) 587 U.S. ___ [ 139 S.Ct. 1407 , 203 L.Ed.2d 626 ] (Lamps Plus), Epic Systems, supra, 584 U.S. ___ [ 138 S.Ct. 1612 ], and Kindred Nursing Centers L.P. v. Clark (2017) 581 U.S. ___ [ 137 S.Ct. 1421 , 197 L.Ed.2d 806 ] (Kindred Nursing).) We are not persuaded. | 1 | 2021–2021 |
Carnival Cruise Lines, Inc. v. Shute
green
2 sentences2019(See Lamps Plus, Inc. v. Varela (2019) --- U.S. ----, [ 139 S.Ct. 1407 , 1420] 203 L.Ed.2d 636 (dis. opn. of Ginsburg, J.) ["Arbitration clauses, the Court has decreed, may preclude judicial remedies even when submission to arbitration is made a take-it-or-leave-it condition of employment"]; Carnival Cruise Lines, Inc. v. Shute (1991) 499 U.S. 585 , 600, 111 S.Ct. 1522 , 113 L.Ed.2d 622 (dis. opn. of Stevens, J.) ["contracts of adhesion ... offered on a take-or-leave basis" are enforceable if reasonable, notwithstanding argument that they cannot "justifiably be enforced ... under traditional c 2019(See Lamps Plus, Inc. v. Varela (2019) --- U.S. ----, [ 139 S.Ct. 1407 , 1420] 203 L.Ed.2d 636 (dis. opn. of Ginsburg, J.) ["Arbitration clauses, the Court has decreed, may preclude judicial remedies even when submission to arbitration is made a take-it-or-leave-it condition of employment"]; Carnival Cruise Lines, Inc. v. Shute (1991) 499 U.S. 585 , 600, 111 S.Ct. 1522 , 113 L.Ed.2d 622 (dis. opn. of Stevens, J.) ["contracts of adhesion ... offered on a take-or-leave basis" are enforceable if reasonable, notwithstanding argument that they cannot "justifiably be enforced ... under traditional c | 1 | 2019–2019 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.