Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 California opinions name it 1 courts 2017–2025 3 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by California courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No positive-treatment citations attached to this issue in California. | ||
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in California. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
People v. Clark
green
2 sentences2025(Clark, supra, 63 Cal.4th at p. 622 .) The Clark court cautioned, however, that such evidence “does not, in itself, necessarily foreclose a finding that defendant acted with reckless indifference to human life.” (Ibid.) Bowman makes no such argument here, choosing instead to focus only on the first four factors. 2023The first four factors were culled from case law; the fifth was added as a matter of first impression. ( Clark, supra, 63 Cal.4th at pp. 618- 622.) Applying these factors, the Clark court held the evidence did not support a conclusion the defendant was recklessly indifferent to human life. | 2 | 2023–2025 |
Artiglio v. Corning Inc.
green
2 sentences2017The services-to keep the battery backup system operational-"were of a kind the actor should have recognized as necessary for the protection of third persons." ( Artiglio, supra, 18 Cal.4th at p. 613 , 76 Cal.Rptr.2d 479 , 957 P.2d 1313 .) Should a duty be found to exist, the trier of fact will determine whether defendant failed to exercise ordinary care and whether that failure proximately caused plaintiffs' injuries. 2017The services-to keep the battery backup system operational-"were of a kind the actor should have recognized as necessary for the protection of third persons." ( Artiglio, supra, 18 Cal.4th at p. 613 , 76 Cal.Rptr.2d 479 , 957 P.2d 1313 .) Should a duty be found to exist, the trier of fact will determine whether defendant failed to exercise ordinary care and whether that failure proximately caused plaintiffs' injuries. | 2 | 2017–2017 |
W.S. v. S.T.
green
1 sentence2023Analysis Although there are no factors that a court must consider in determining whether substantial evidence supports that the claimed father received the child into his home (W.S. v. S.T., supra, 20 Cal.App.5th at p. 145 ), we will use the factors set forth 14 in T.R. as a framework for our analysis, to the extent they are relevant.2 The first four factors—“[1] whether the man actively helped the mother in prenatal care; [2] whether he paid pregnancy and birth expenses commensurate with his ability to do so; [3] whether he promptly took legal action to obtain custody of the child; [and] [4] | 1 | 2023–2023 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.