Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 California opinions name it 2 courts 2016–2016 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by California courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No positive-treatment citations attached to this issue in California. | ||
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in California. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
The People v. Williams
green
2 sentences2016Thus, we will not consider the Gonzales case in our analysis of the issue before us.5 In Williams, our high court discussed whether a man who committed theft by false pretenses and subsequently pushed a security guard in an attempt to flee could satisfy the "felonious taking" requirement of robbery. ( Williams, supra, 57 Cal.4th at pp. 779-780.) One element of robbery, which is not present in any other type of theft, is the "felonious taking" requirement. 2016In Williams , our high court discussed whether a man who committed theft by false pretenses and subsequently pushed a security guard in an attempt to *359 flee could satisfy the "felonious taking" requirement of robbery. ( Williams, supra, 57 Cal.4th at pp. 779-780, 161 Cal.Rptr.3d 81 , 305 P.3d 1241 .) One element of robbery, which is not present in any other type of theft, is the "felonious taking" requirement. | 5 | 2016–2016 |
People v. Triplett
green
2 sentences2016The defendant argued that the "felonious taking" requirement could 4 Since the briefing in this case the Third District has issued another opinion agreeing with the position taken in People v. Triplett, supra, 244 Cal.App.4th 824 . 2016The defendant argued that the "felonious taking" requirement could 4 Since the briefing in this case the Third District has issued another opinion agreeing with the position taken in People v. Triplett, supra, 244 Cal.App.4th 824 . | 1 | 2016–2016 |