Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 California opinions name it 1 courts 1972–2015 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by California courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
People v. Gaygreen2 sentences1972Code, § 245, subd. (a)) was amended from “Not exceeding ten years” to “for six months to life” (Italics added.) Since the determinants whether offenses are greater or lesser with respect to each other, are generally the prescribed maximum penalties (In re McGrew, 66 Cal.2d 685, 688-689 [ 58 Cal.Rptr. 561 , 427 P.2d 161 ]; People v. Gay, 230 Cal.App.2d 102, 104 [ 40 Cal.Rptr. 778 ]), it will be seen that assault with intent to commit murder is now, quite illogically, an offense lesser than either assault with intent to commit manslaughter or assault with a deadly weapon. 1972Code, § 245, subd. (a)) was amended from “Not exceeding ten years” to “for six months to life” (Italics added.) Since the determinants whether offenses are greater or lesser with respect to each other, are generally the prescribed maximum penalties (In re McGrew, 66 Cal.2d 685, 688-689 [ 58 Cal.Rptr. 561 , 427 P.2d 161 ]; People v. Gay, 230 Cal.App.2d 102, 104 [ 40 Cal.Rptr. 778 ]), it will be seen that assault with intent to commit murder is now, quite illogically, an offense lesser than either assault with intent to commit manslaughter or assault with a deadly weapon. | 2 | 2 |
In Re McGrewgreen2 sentences1972Code, § 245, subd. (a)) was amended from “Not exceeding ten years” to “for six months to life” (Italics added.) Since the determinants whether offenses are greater or lesser with respect to each other, are generally the prescribed maximum penalties (In re McGrew, 66 Cal.2d 685, 688-689 [ 58 Cal.Rptr. 561 , 427 P.2d 161 ]; People v. Gay, 230 Cal.App.2d 102, 104 [ 40 Cal.Rptr. 778 ]), it will be seen that assault with intent to commit murder is now, quite illogically, an offense lesser than either assault with intent to commit manslaughter or assault with a deadly weapon. 1972Code, § 245, subd. (a)) was amended from “Not exceeding ten years” to “for six months to life” (Italics added.) Since the determinants whether offenses are greater or lesser with respect to each other, are generally the prescribed maximum penalties (In re McGrew, 66 Cal.2d 685, 688-689 [ 58 Cal.Rptr. 561 , 427 P.2d 161 ]; People v. Gay, 230 Cal.App.2d 102, 104 [ 40 Cal.Rptr. 778 ]), it will be seen that assault with intent to commit murder is now, quite illogically, an offense lesser than either assault with intent to commit manslaughter or assault with a deadly weapon. | 2 | 2 |
In Re Atilesred1 sentence1987(Atiles, supra, 33 Cal.3d at p. 813.) An entirely new parole period will be imposed at the end of the new term. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
People v. Lopezgreen2 sentences2015Thus, his admission that the prior convictions were valid cannot be construed as an admission of the allegations that he served prior, separate prison terms for each of those convictions." ( 163 Cal.App.3d at p. 951 .) We decline to follow Epperson or Lopez to the extent they are understood to require reversal of a section 667.5, subdivision (b) enhancement where, as here, the defendant's admission of a prior conviction does not include an express admission of the separate prison term element. 2014Thus, his admission that the prior convictions were valid cannot be construed as an admission of the allegations that he served prior, separate prison terms for each of those convictions." (People v. Lopez, supra, 163 Cal.App.3d at p. 951 .) To the extent Epperson and Lopez may be read to require per se reversal of a sentencing enhancement where the defendant admits a prior conviction but does not expressly admit having served a term in a penal institution for that conviction, we decline to follow them. | 1 | 2 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.