Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 California opinions name it 2 courts 1980–2019 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by California courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Select Base Materials, Inc. v. Board of Equalizationgreen2 sentences1980Rather, I fully agree with the following thoughtful reasoning and analysis of Justice Janes, writing for a unanimous Court of Appeal in this case: “[W]e have analyzed S.B. 91 with the view, if possible, ‘to effectuate the purpose of the law’ (Select Base Materials v. Board of Equal. (1959) 51 Cal.2d 640, 645 [ 335 P.2d 672 ]), and find that the purpose of S.B. 91 is to grant extra compensation or extra allowance to public officers and employees after service has been rendered. 1980Rather, I fully agree with the following thoughtful reasoning and analysis of Justice Janes, writing for a unanimous Court of Appeal in this case: “[W]e have analyzed S.B. 91 with the view, if possible, ‘to effectuate the purpose of the law’ (Select Base Materials v. Board of Equal. (1959) 51 Cal.2d 640, 645 [ 335 P.2d 672 ]), and find that the purpose of S.B. 91 is to grant extra compensation or extra allowance to public officers and employees after service has been rendered. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in California. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
San Diego Unified School District v. Commission on Professional Competence
green
2 sentences2019In our view, the superior court's decision-which is silent as to the Commission's thoughtful reasoning and analysis as to the witnesses' *928 credibility-did not afford the respect due those findings." ( San Diego Unified School Dist. v. Commission on Professional Competence, supra , 214 Cal.App.4th at p. 1148 , 154 Cal.Rptr.3d 751 .) Further, CDI filed briefs in 2003 and 2004 in Krumme , opposing Mercury's position. 2019In our view, the superior court's decision-which is silent as to the Commission's thoughtful reasoning and analysis as to the witnesses' *928 credibility-did not afford the respect due those findings." ( San Diego Unified School Dist. v. Commission on Professional Competence, supra , 214 Cal.App.4th at p. 1148 , 154 Cal.Rptr.3d 751 .) Further, CDI filed briefs in 2003 and 2004 in Krumme , opposing Mercury's position. | 4 | 2019–2019 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.