Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 California opinions name it 1 courts 2013–2022 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by California courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Rymer v. Haglergreen2 sentences2013The failure of an aggrieved party to seek judicial review of a final order of the WCAB bars later challenge to the propriety of the order or decision before either the WCAB or the court. ( Maranian, supra, 81 Cal.App.4th at p.1076; see also Rymer v. Hagler (1989) 211 Cal.App.3d 1171, 1182 .) The purpose of this rule is to facilitate early disposition of core questions, and promote the public policy favoring expeditious and inexpensive resolution of workers' compensation claims. 2013The failure of an aggrieved party to seek judicial review of a final order of the WCAB bars later challenge to the propriety of the order or decision before either the WCAB or the court. ( Maranian, supra, 81 Cal.App.4th at p.1076; see also Rymer v. Hagler (1989) 211 Cal.App.3d 1171, 1182 .) The purpose of this rule is to facilitate early disposition of core questions, and promote the public policy favoring expeditious and inexpensive resolution of workers' compensation claims. | 3 | 3 |
State Farm General Insurance v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Boardgreen2 sentences2022Appeals Bd. (2013) 218 Cal.App.4th 258, 268 [“[t]he failure of an aggrieved party to seek judicial review of a final order of the WCAB bars later challenge to the propriety of the order or decision before either the WCAB or the court”].) “ ‘[F]undamental jurisdiction cannot be conferred by waiver, estoppel, or consent. 2022Appeals Bd. (2013) 218 Cal.App.4th 258, 268 [“[t]he failure of an aggrieved party to seek judicial review of a final order of the WCAB bars later challenge to the propriety of the order or decision before either the WCAB or the court”].) “ ‘[F]undamental jurisdiction cannot be conferred by waiver, estoppel, or consent. | 2 | 2 |
Duncan v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Boardgreen2 sentences2013(Duncan v. Workers’ Comp. *261 Appeals Bd. (2008) 166 Cal.App.4th 294, 299 [ 82 Cal.Rptr.3d 664 ].) The failure of an aggrieved party to seek judicial review of a final order of the WCAB bars later challenge to the propriety of the order or decision before either the WCAB or the court. 2013(Duncan v. Workers’ Comp. *261 Appeals Bd. (2008) 166 Cal.App.4th 294, 299 [ 82 Cal.Rptr.3d 664 ].) The failure of an aggrieved party to seek judicial review of a final order of the WCAB bars later challenge to the propriety of the order or decision before either the WCAB or the court. | 1 | 3 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in California. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Maranian v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board
green
2 sentences2013The failure of an aggrieved party to seek judicial review of a final order of the WCAB bars later challenge to the propriety of the order or decision before either the WCAB or the court. ( Maranian, supra, 81 Cal.App.4th at p.1076; see also Rymer v. Hagler (1989) 211 Cal.App.3d 1171, 1182 .) The purpose of this rule is to facilitate early disposition of core questions, and promote the public policy favoring expeditious and inexpensive resolution of workers' compensation claims. 2013The failure of an aggrieved party to seek judicial review of a final order of the WCAB bars later challenge to the propriety of the order or decision before either the WCAB or the court. ( Maranian, supra, 81 Cal.App.4th at p.1076; see also Rymer v. Hagler (1989) 211 Cal.App.3d 1171, 1182 .) The purpose of this rule is to facilitate early disposition of core questions, and promote the public policy favoring expeditious and inexpensive resolution of workers' compensation claims. | 3 | 2013–2013 |
People v. Lara
green
2 sentences2022Rather, an act beyond a court’s jurisdiction in the fundamental sense is null and void” ab initio. [Citation.] “Therefore, a claim based on a lack of . . . fundamental jurisdiction[] may be raised for the first time on appeal. [Citation.]” (People v. Lara (2010) 48 Cal.4th 216, 225 .) The lack of fundamental jurisdiction is defined as “ ‘ “an entire absence of power to hear or determine the case, an absence of authority over the subject matter or the parties.” [Citation.]’ ” (Ibid.) Petitioners’ claim goes to the fundamental jurisdiction of the workers’ compensation court over them following t 2022Rather, an act beyond a court’s jurisdiction in the fundamental sense is null and void” ab initio. [Citation.] “Therefore, a claim based on a lack of . . . fundamental jurisdiction[] may be raised for the first time on appeal. [Citation.]” (People v. Lara (2010) 48 Cal.4th 216, 225 .) The lack of fundamental jurisdiction is defined as “ ‘ “an entire absence of power to hear or determine the case, an absence of authority over the subject matter or the parties.” [Citation.]’ ” (Ibid.) Petitioners’ claim goes to the fundamental jurisdiction of the workers’ compensation court over them following t | 2 | 2022–2022 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.