Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Connecticut opinions name it 2 courts 2001–2018 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Connecticut courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Broadnax v. City of New Havengreen2 sentences2009This court previously examined the defendants’ practice of underfilling in Broadnax v. New Haven, 270 Conn. 133, 160, 179 , 851 A.2d 1113 (2004) (Broadnax I), and concluded that the practice of underfilling violates the city’s charter, its municipal ordinances and its civil service rules and regulations and affirmed the judgment of the trial court enjoining the city from engaging in the practice prospectively. 2009This court previously examined the defendants’ practice of underfilling in Broadnax v. New Haven, 270 Conn. 133, 160, 179 , 851 A.2d 1113 (2004) (Broadnax I), and concluded that the practice of underfilling violates the city’s charter, its municipal ordinances and its civil service rules and regulations and affirmed the judgment of the trial court enjoining the city from engaging in the practice prospectively. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Connecticut. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Batson v. Kentucky
green
2 sentences2016The petitioner claims that the court abused its discretion in denying his petition for certifica- tion to appeal because counsel at his criminal trial ren- dered ineffective assistance by failing to preserve for appellate review a claim that the state had excluded a potential juror on the basis of race in violation of Batson v. Kentucky, 476 U.S. 79 , 106 S. Ct. 1712 , 90 L. 2016The petitioner claims that the court abused its discretion in denying his petition for certifica- tion to appeal because counsel at his criminal trial ren- dered ineffective assistance by failing to preserve for appellate review a claim that the state had excluded a potential juror on the basis of race in violation of Batson v. Kentucky, 476 U.S. 79 , 106 S. Ct. 1712 , 90 L. | 3 | 2001–2016 |
Sheets v. Teddy's Frosted Foods, Inc.
green
2 sentences2018We note that the only explicit mention of race is contained in paragraph one of the initial complaint, where it is alleged that the plaintiff is "a white, sixty-two (62) year old female ...." 5 In her brief, the plaintiff argues that her claim is indeed one of discrimination on the basis of race in violation of the act: "The issue, then, regarding the first count concerns the adequacy of the allegation ... to state a claim under [§§] 46a-101 (e) and 46-100." We note also that the trial court determined, as a matter of law, that count one of the amended substitute complaint alleged race discrim 2018We note that the only explicit mention of race is contained in paragraph one of the initial complaint, where it is alleged that the plaintiff is "a white, sixty-two (62) year old female ...." 5 In her brief, the plaintiff argues that her claim is indeed one of discrimination on the basis of race in violation of the act: "The issue, then, regarding the first count concerns the adequacy of the allegation ... to state a claim under [§§] 46a-101 (e) and 46-100." We note also that the trial court determined, as a matter of law, that count one of the amended substitute complaint alleged race discrim | 1 | 2018–2018 |
Tomlinson v. Board of Education
green
2 sentences2018We note that the only explicit mention of race is contained in paragraph one of the initial complaint, where it is alleged that the plaintiff is "a white, sixty-two (62) year old female ...." 5 In her brief, the plaintiff argues that her claim is indeed one of discrimination on the basis of race in violation of the act: "The issue, then, regarding the first count concerns the adequacy of the allegation ... to state a claim under [§§] 46a-101 (e) and 46-100." We note also that the trial court determined, as a matter of law, that count one of the amended substitute complaint alleged race discrim 2018We note that the only explicit mention of race is contained in paragraph one of the initial complaint, where it is alleged that the plaintiff is "a white, sixty-two (62) year old female ...." 5 In her brief, the plaintiff argues that her claim is indeed one of discrimination on the basis of race in violation of the act: "The issue, then, regarding the first count concerns the adequacy of the allegation ... to state a claim under [§§] 46a-101 (e) and 46-100." We note also that the trial court determined, as a matter of law, that count one of the amended substitute complaint alleged race discrim | 1 | 2018–2018 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.