Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Connecticut opinions name it 3 courts 1986–2021 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Connecticut courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Castonguaygreen2 sentences2021Although the equal protection test is similar to the cross section test, the critical difference is that in an equal protection claim the defendant must prove discriminatory purpose.’’ (Citation omitted; emphasis omitted; internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Moore, supra, 169 Conn. App. 486 ; see also State v. Castonguay, 194 Conn. 416, 421 , 481 A.2d 56 (1984) (discriminatory intent required to prove equal protection violation). 2021Although the equal protection test is similar to the cross section test, the critical difference is that in an equal protection claim the defendant must prove discriminatory purpose.’’ (Citation omitted; emphasis omitted; internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Moore, supra, 169 Conn. App. 486 ; see also State v. Castonguay, 194 Conn. 416, 421 , 481 A.2d 56 (1984) (discriminatory intent required to prove equal protection violation). | 1 | 3 |
Michael McCray v. Robert Abramsyellow1 sentence1986There are those who predict that any limitation on the peremptory challenge signals the end of its use as “an effective jury selection tool.” McCray v. Abrams, supra, 1139. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Connecticut. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Duren v. Missouri
green
2 sentences1996The defendant does not challenge his venire panels pursuant to Duren v. Missouri, 439 U.S. 357 , 99 S. Ct. 664 , 58 L. 1996The defendant does not challenge his venire panels pursuant to Duren v. Missouri, 439 U.S. 357 , 99 S. Ct. 664 , 58 L. | 1 | 1996–1996 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.