Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Connecticut opinions name it 2 courts 1983–2020 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Connecticut courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Gallagherred2 sentences2020In support of this argument, the petitioner relies on a single sentence in In re Adalberto S., 27 Conn. App. 49, 58 , 604 A.2d 822 , cert. denied, 222 Conn. 903 , 606 A.2d 1328 (1992), wherein this court stated: ‘‘[A]n unlawful warrantless intrusion into the home creates a privilege to resist arrest.’’ The court in In re Adalberto S., cited to our Supreme Court’s holding in State v. Gallagher, 191 Conn. 433, 442 , 465 A.2d 323 (1983), as support for this statement. 2020In support of this argument, the petitioner relies on a single sentence in In re Adalberto S., 27 Conn. App. 49, 58 , 604 A.2d 822 , cert. denied, 222 Conn. 903 , 606 A.2d 1328 (1992), wherein this court stated: ‘‘[A]n unlawful warrantless intrusion into the home creates a privilege to resist arrest.’’ The court in In re Adalberto S., cited to our Supreme Court’s holding in State v. Gallagher, 191 Conn. 433, 442 , 465 A.2d 323 (1983), as support for this statement. | 1 | 3 |
Ruggiero v. Pelliccigreen2 sentences2010See, e.g., Ruggiero v. Pellicci, 294 Conn. 473 , 481 n. 5, 987 A.2d 339 (2010) (declining to review inadequately briefed claim). [8] General Statutes § 53a-19(a) provides in relevant part: "[A] person is justified in using reasonable physical force upon another person to defend himself or a third person from what he reasonably believes to be the use or imminent use of physical force, and he may use such degree of force which he reasonably believes to be necessary for such purpose... . ." [9] Under the common law, an unlawful, warrantless intrusion into a person's home creates a privilege to re 2010See, e.g., Ruggiero v. Pellicci, 294 Conn. 473 , 481 n. 5, 987 A.2d 339 (2010) (declining to review inadequately briefed claim). [8] General Statutes § 53a-19(a) provides in relevant part: "[A] person is justified in using reasonable physical force upon another person to defend himself or a third person from what he reasonably believes to be the use or imminent use of physical force, and he may use such degree of force which he reasonably believes to be necessary for such purpose... . ." [9] Under the common law, an unlawful, warrantless intrusion into a person's home creates a privilege to re | 1 | 1 |
United States v. Augustine Ferronegreen2 sentences1983See Chevigny, supra, 1133-34,1142; see also United States v. Ferrone, supra, 390 n.19. 1983See Chevigny, supra, 1133-34, 1142; see also United States v. Ferrone, supra, 390 n.19. *443 The United States Supreme Court's 1980—decision in Payton v. New York, 445 U.S. 573 , 100 S. Ct. 1371 , 63 L. Ed.2d 639 (1980), exemplifies the sharp distinction drawn by modern fourth amendment jurisprudence between the relative intrusiveness of arrests effected in the street and those occurring in the home. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Connecticut. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Brocuglio
green
2 sentences2010See, e.g., Ruggiero v. Pellicci, 294 Conn. 473 , 481 n. 5, 987 A.2d 339 (2010) (declining to review inadequately briefed claim). [8] General Statutes § 53a-19(a) provides in relevant part: "[A] person is justified in using reasonable physical force upon another person to defend himself or a third person from what he reasonably believes to be the use or imminent use of physical force, and he may use such degree of force which he reasonably believes to be necessary for such purpose... . ." [9] Under the common law, an unlawful, warrantless intrusion into a person's home creates a privilege to re 2010See, e.g., Ruggiero v. Pellicci, 294 Conn. 473 , 481 n. 5, 987 A.2d 339 (2010) (declining to review inadequately briefed claim). [8] General Statutes § 53a-19(a) provides in relevant part: "[A] person is justified in using reasonable physical force upon another person to defend himself or a third person from what he reasonably believes to be the use or imminent use of physical force, and he may use such degree of force which he reasonably believes to be necessary for such purpose... . ." [9] Under the common law, an unlawful, warrantless intrusion into a person's home creates a privilege to re | 3 | 2009–2020 |
In re Adalberto S.
green
2 sentences2020In support of this argument, the petitioner relies on a single sentence in In re Adalberto S., 27 Conn. App. 49, 58 , 604 A.2d 822 , cert. denied, 222 Conn. 903 , 606 A.2d 1328 (1992), wherein this court stated: ‘‘[A]n unlawful warrantless intrusion into the home creates a privilege to resist arrest.’’ The court in In re Adalberto S., cited to our Supreme Court’s holding in State v. Gallagher, 191 Conn. 433, 442 , 465 A.2d 323 (1983), as support for this statement. 2020In support of this argument, the petitioner relies on a single sentence in In re Adalberto S., 27 Conn. App. 49, 58 , 604 A.2d 822 , cert. denied, 222 Conn. 903 , 606 A.2d 1328 (1992), wherein this court stated: ‘‘[A]n unlawful warrantless intrusion into the home creates a privilege to resist arrest.’’ The court in In re Adalberto S., cited to our Supreme Court’s holding in State v. Gallagher, 191 Conn. 433, 442 , 465 A.2d 323 (1983), as support for this statement. | 1 | 2020–2020 |
In re Adalberto S.
green
2 sentences2020In support of this argument, the petitioner relies on a single sentence in In re Adalberto S., 27 Conn. App. 49, 58 , 604 A.2d 822 , cert. denied, 222 Conn. 903 , 606 A.2d 1328 (1992), wherein this court stated: ‘‘[A]n unlawful warrantless intrusion into the home creates a privilege to resist arrest.’’ The court in In re Adalberto S., cited to our Supreme Court’s holding in State v. Gallagher, 191 Conn. 433, 442 , 465 A.2d 323 (1983), as support for this statement. 2020In support of this argument, the petitioner relies on a single sentence in In re Adalberto S., 27 Conn. App. 49, 58 , 604 A.2d 822 , cert. denied, 222 Conn. 903 , 606 A.2d 1328 (1992), wherein this court stated: ‘‘[A]n unlawful warrantless intrusion into the home creates a privilege to resist arrest.’’ The court in In re Adalberto S., cited to our Supreme Court’s holding in State v. Gallagher, 191 Conn. 433, 442 , 465 A.2d 323 (1983), as support for this statement. | 1 | 2020–2020 |
Payton v. New York
green
2 sentences1983See Chevigny, supra, 1133-34, 1142; see also United States v. Ferrone, supra, 390 n.19. *443 The United States Supreme Court's 1980—decision in Payton v. New York, 445 U.S. 573 , 100 S. Ct. 1371 , 63 L. Ed.2d 639 (1980), exemplifies the sharp distinction drawn by modern fourth amendment jurisprudence between the relative intrusiveness of arrests effected in the street and those occurring in the home. 1983See Chevigny, supra, 1133-34, 1142; see also United States v. Ferrone, supra, 390 n.19. *443 The United States Supreme Court's 1980—decision in Payton v. New York, 445 U.S. 573 , 100 S. Ct. 1371 , 63 L. Ed.2d 639 (1980), exemplifies the sharp distinction drawn by modern fourth amendment jurisprudence between the relative intrusiveness of arrests effected in the street and those occurring in the home. | 1 | 1983–1983 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.