mootness is rooted in the same doctrine (Connecticut) · Go Syfert
← Connecticut issues

mootness is rooted in the same doctrine in Connecticut

5 Connecticut opinions name it 2 courts 2003–2019 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Connecticut courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (1)

CaseFollowedCited
Loisel v. Rowegreen
conn · 1995 · cited in 1 Connecticut opinions naming this issue, 2019–2019
2 sentences

2019There is nothing in the record to show that the plaintiff has appeared for other interests in a representative capacity; nor is she in a class whose interests have been described as capable of repetition.’’ [Citations omitted; internal quotation marks omitted.]); see also Loisel v. Rowe, 233 Conn. 370, 378 , 660 A.2d 323 (1995) (explaining that, in context of capable of repetition, yet evading review requirement, ‘‘[t]he doctrine of mootness is rooted in the same policy interests as the doctrine of standing, namely, to assure the vigorous presentation of arguments concerning the matter at issu

2019There is nothing in the record to show that the plaintiff has appeared for other interests in a representative capacity; nor is she in a class whose interests have been described as capable of repetition.’’ [Citations omitted; internal quotation marks omitted.]); see also Loisel v. Rowe, 233 Conn. 370, 378 , 660 A.2d 323 (1995) (explaining that, in context of capable of repetition, yet evading review requirement, ‘‘[t]he doctrine of mootness is rooted in the same policy interests as the doctrine of standing, namely, to assure the vigorous presentation of arguments concerning the matter at issu

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Connecticut. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (1)

CaseCitedYears
State v. McElveen green
conn · 2002
2 sentences

2013“The doctrine of mootness is rooted in the same policy interests as the doctrine of standing, namely, to assure the vigorous presentation of arguments concerning the matter at issue.” State v. McElveen, 261 Conn. 198, 204 , 802 A.2d 74 (2002).

2013“The doctrine of mootness is rooted in the same policy interests as the doctrine of standing, namely, to assure the vigorous presentation of arguments concerning the matter at issue.” State v. McElveen, 261 Conn. 198, 204 , 802 A.2d 74 (2002).

42003–2013

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check