res judicata is not applicable doctrine (Connecticut) · Go Syfert
← Connecticut issues

res judicata is not applicable doctrine in Connecticut

5 Connecticut opinions name it 3 courts 1992–2005 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Connecticut courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (0)

CaseFollowedCited
No positive-treatment citations attached to this issue in Connecticut.

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Connecticut. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (4)

CaseCitedYears
James L. v. Commissioner of Correction green
conn · 1998
2 sentences

2005Relying on James L. v. Commissioner of Correction, 245 Conn. 132 , 712 A.2d 947 (1998), the plaintiffs in error contend that, because habeas corpus proceedings allow the presentation of evidence outside the trial court record, principles of res judicata are inconsistent with the administration of justice in habeas corpus cases.

2000In any event, in the ruling by the Supreme Court in James L. v. Commissioner , 245 Conn. 132 , 142 (1998), the Court determined that the present and prior petitions did not present the same grounds and went on to say that even if they did, the doctrine of res judicata is not applicable to habeas petitions.

22000–2005
In re David W. neutral
connappct · 1999
1 sentence

2001Here, the respondents appear to argue that according to In re David W., supra, 52 Conn. App. 576 , the court should have adjudicated D and K neglected in a separate, autonomous proceeding before reaching the merits of the termination petitions in the present case.

12001–2001
Hughes v. Bemer green
conn · 1988
2 sentences

1993The defendant's reliance, in part, on Hughes v. Bemer, 206 Conn. 491 , 538 A.2d 703 (1988), for the proposition that a ruling on a motion to strike constitutes a final determination is misplaced.

1993The defendant's reliance, in part, on Hughes v. Bemer, 206 Conn. 491 , 538 A.2d 703 (1988), for the proposition that a ruling on a motion to strike constitutes a final determination is misplaced.

11993–1993
Wade's Dairy, Inc. v. Town of Fairfield green
conn · 1980
2 sentences

1992"The doctrine of res judicata holds that an existing final judgment rendered upon the merits without fraud or collusion, by a court of competent jurisdiction, is conclusive of causes of action and of facts or issues thereby litigated as to the parties. . ." Wade's Dairy, Inc. v. Fairfield, 181 Conn. 556 , 559 , 436 A.2d 24 (1980).

1992"The doctrine of res judicata holds that an existing final judgment rendered upon the merits without fraud or collusion, by a court of competent jurisdiction, is conclusive of causes of action and of facts or issues thereby litigated as to the parties. . ." Wade's Dairy, Inc. v. Fairfield, 181 Conn. 556 , 559 , 436 A.2d 24 (1980).

11992–1992

Where else courts name it

CA 11 (1897–2017) FL 6 (1953–2002) IN 5 (1966–2006) OH 5 (2002–2020) CT 5 (1992–2005) PA 4 (1957–2015) NY 4 (1929–1996) MI 4 (1957–2015) MA 4 (1931–1981) IL 4 (1979–1999) TX 3 (1974–1987) NC 3 (1959–2013) ND 3 (1913–1985) KY 2 (1950–2002) SC 2 (1962–1986) WV 2 (1982–1985) WI 2 (1963–1980) TN 2 (2000–2001) NM 2 (1973–2017) MT 2 (1987–2006) MD 2 (1976–1988)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check