Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
8 Connecticut opinions name it 2 courts 2016–2026 5 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Connecticut courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Antwon B.green2 sentences2026The two steps of [our] analysis are separate and distinct, and we may reject the claim if we conclude [that] the defendant State v. Fluker has failed to establish either prong.” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Antwon B., 236 Conn. App. 428, 455, 348 A.3d 814 (2025), cert. denied, 354 Conn. 910, 349 A.3d 1094 (2026). “[W]e must examine not only whether any individual impropriety deprived the defendant of his right to a fair trial, but also whether the cumulative effect of multiple improprieties . . . deprived [him] of his . . . right to a fair trial. . . . 2026The two steps of [our] analysis are separate and distinct, and we may reject the claim if we conclude [that] the defendant State v. Fluker has failed to establish either prong.” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Antwon B., 236 Conn. App. 428, 455, 348 A.3d 814 (2025), cert. denied, 354 Conn. 910, 349 A.3d 1094 (2026). “[W]e must examine not only whether any individual impropriety deprived the defendant of his right to a fair trial, but also whether the cumulative effect of multiple improprieties . . . deprived [him] of his . . . right to a fair trial. . . . | 1 | 2 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Connecticut. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. A. M.
green
2 sentences2021The latter part of this two-pronged test is guided by the factors set forth in State v. Williams, 204 Conn. 523, 540 , 529 A.2d 653 (1987). ‘‘These factors include . . . the extent to which the [impropriety] was invited by defense conduct or argument . . . the severity of the [impropriety] . . . the frequency of the [impropriety] . . . the centrality of the [impropriety] to the critical issues in the case . . . the strength of the curative measures adopted . . . and the strength of the state’s case.’’ (Internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Payne, 303 Conn. 538, 561 , 34 A.3d 370 (2012). 2021The latter part of this two-pronged test is guided by the factors set forth in State v. Williams, 204 Conn. 523, 540 , 529 A.2d 653 (1987). ‘‘These factors include . . . the extent to which the [impropriety] was invited by defense conduct or argument . . . the severity of the [impropriety] . . . the frequency of the [impropriety] . . . the centrality of the [impropriety] to the critical issues in the case . . . the strength of the curative measures adopted . . . and the strength of the state’s case.’’ (Internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Payne, 303 Conn. 538, 561 , 34 A.3d 370 (2012). | 2 | 2018–2021 |
State v. Williams
green
2 sentences2021The latter part of this two-pronged test is guided by the factors set forth in State v. Williams, 204 Conn. 523, 540 , 529 A.2d 653 (1987). ‘‘These factors include . . . the extent to which the [impropriety] was invited by defense conduct or argument . . . the severity of the [impropriety] . . . the frequency of the [impropriety] . . . the centrality of the [impropriety] to the critical issues in the case . . . the strength of the curative measures adopted . . . and the strength of the state’s case.’’ (Internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Payne, 303 Conn. 538, 561 , 34 A.3d 370 (2012). 2021The latter part of this two-pronged test is guided by the factors set forth in State v. Williams, 204 Conn. 523, 540 , 529 A.2d 653 (1987). ‘‘These factors include . . . the extent to which the [impropriety] was invited by defense conduct or argument . . . the severity of the [impropriety] . . . the frequency of the [impropriety] . . . the centrality of the [impropriety] to the critical issues in the case . . . the strength of the curative measures adopted . . . and the strength of the state’s case.’’ (Internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Payne, 303 Conn. 538, 561 , 34 A.3d 370 (2012). | 2 | 2016–2021 |
State v. Payne
green
2 sentences2021The latter part of this two-pronged test is guided by the factors set forth in State v. Williams, 204 Conn. 523, 540 , 529 A.2d 653 (1987). ‘‘These factors include . . . the extent to which the [impropriety] was invited by defense conduct or argument . . . the severity of the [impropriety] . . . the frequency of the [impropriety] . . . the centrality of the [impropriety] to the critical issues in the case . . . the strength of the curative measures adopted . . . and the strength of the state’s case.’’ (Internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Payne, 303 Conn. 538, 561 , 34 A.3d 370 (2012). 2021The latter part of this two-pronged test is guided by the factors set forth in State v. Williams, 204 Conn. 523, 540 , 529 A.2d 653 (1987). ‘‘These factors include . . . the extent to which the [impropriety] was invited by defense conduct or argument . . . the severity of the [impropriety] . . . the frequency of the [impropriety] . . . the centrality of the [impropriety] to the critical issues in the case . . . the strength of the curative measures adopted . . . and the strength of the state’s case.’’ (Internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Payne, 303 Conn. 538, 561 , 34 A.3d 370 (2012). | 2 | 2016–2021 |
State v. Pernell
green
2 sentences2024The two steps of [our] analysis are separate and distinct, and we may reject the claim if we conclude [that] the defendant has failed to establish either prong.’’ (Citations omitted; internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Pernell, 194 Conn. App. 394 , 10 ,0 0 Conn. App. 1 State v. Maurice B. 403-404, 221 A.3d 457 , cert. denied, 334 Conn. 910 , 221 A.3d 44 (2019). 2024The two steps of [our] analysis are separate and distinct, and we may reject the claim if we conclude [that] the defendant has failed to establish either prong.’’ (Citations omitted; internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Pernell, 194 Conn. App. 394 , 10 ,0 0 Conn. App. 1 State v. Maurice B. 403-404, 221 A.3d 457 , cert. denied, 334 Conn. 910 , 221 A.3d 44 (2019). | 1 | 2024–2024 |
State v. Hargett
green
2 sentences2021Under the Williams general due process standard, the defendant has the burden to show both that the prosecutor’s conduct was improper and that it caused prejudice to his defense.’’ (Internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Hargett, 196 Conn. App. 228 , 265-66, 229 A.3d 1047 , cert. granted, 335 Conn. 952 , 238 A.3d 730 (2020). ‘‘Ultimately, [t]he issue is whether the prosecutor’s conduct so infected the trial with unfairness as to make the resulting conviction a denial of due process.’’ (Internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Courtney G., supra, 339 Conn. 362 . 2021Under the Williams general due process standard, the defendant has the burden to show both that the prosecutor’s conduct was improper and that it caused prejudice to his defense.’’ (Internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Hargett, 196 Conn. App. 228 , 265-66, 229 A.3d 1047 , cert. granted, 335 Conn. 952 , 238 A.3d 730 (2020). ‘‘Ultimately, [t]he issue is whether the prosecutor’s conduct so infected the trial with unfairness as to make the resulting conviction a denial of due process.’’ (Internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Courtney G., supra, 339 Conn. 362 . | 1 | 2021–2021 |
Gawlik v. Semple
green
1 sentence2021Under the Williams general due process standard, the defendant has the burden to show both that the prosecutor’s conduct was improper and that it caused prejudice to his defense.’’ (Internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Hargett, 196 Conn. App. 228 , 265-66, 229 A.3d 1047 , cert. granted, 335 Conn. 952 , 238 A.3d 730 (2020). ‘‘Ultimately, [t]he issue is whether the prosecutor’s conduct so infected the trial with unfairness as to make the resulting conviction a denial of due process.’’ (Internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Courtney G., supra, 339 Conn. 362 . | 1 | 2021–2021 |
State v. ANGEL T.
green
2 sentences2021As explained previously, the Williams general due process standard involves the application of a two step analytical process. ‘‘The two steps are separate and distinct: (1) whether [impropriety] occurred in the first instance; and (2) whether that [impropriety] deprived a defendant of his due process right to a fair trial.’’ (Internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Angel T., 292 Conn. 262, 275 , 973 A.2d 1207 (2009). 2021As explained previously, the Williams general due process standard involves the application of a two step analytical process. ‘‘The two steps are separate and distinct: (1) whether [impropriety] occurred in the first instance; and (2) whether that [impropriety] deprived a defendant of his due process right to a fair trial.’’ (Internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Angel T., 292 Conn. 262, 275 , 973 A.2d 1207 (2009). | 1 | 2021–2021 |
State v. Papantoniou
green
2 sentences2020Under the Williams general due process standard, the defendant has the burden to show both that the prosecutor’s conduct was improper and that it caused prejudice to his defense.’’ (Citations omitted; internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Papantoniou, 185 Conn. App. 93 , 110-11, 196 A.3d 839 , cert. denied, 330 Conn. 948 , 196 A.3d 326 (2018). 2020Under the Williams general due process standard, the defendant has the burden to show both that the prosecutor’s conduct was improper and that it caused prejudice to his defense.’’ (Citations omitted; internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Papantoniou, 185 Conn. App. 93 , 110-11, 196 A.3d 839 , cert. denied, 330 Conn. 948 , 196 A.3d 326 (2018). | 1 | 2020–2020 |
State v. Papantoniou
green
2 sentences2020Under the Williams general due process standard, the defendant has the burden to show both that the prosecutor’s conduct was improper and that it caused prejudice to his defense.’’ (Citations omitted; internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Papantoniou, 185 Conn. App. 93 , 110-11, 196 A.3d 839 , cert. denied, 330 Conn. 948 , 196 A.3d 326 (2018). 2020Under the Williams general due process standard, the defendant has the burden to show both that the prosecutor’s conduct was improper and that it caused prejudice to his defense.’’ (Citations omitted; internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Papantoniou, 185 Conn. App. 93 , 110-11, 196 A.3d 839 , cert. denied, 330 Conn. 948 , 196 A.3d 326 (2018). | 1 | 2020–2020 |
State v. Danovan T.
neutral
2 sentences2018"The two steps of [our] analysis are separate and distinct, and we may reject the claim if we conclude that the defendant has failed to establish either prong." State v. Danovan T. , 176 Conn. App. 637 , 644, 170 A.3d 722 (2017), cert. denied, 327 Conn. 992 , 175 A.3d 1247 (2018) ; see also State v. Aviles , 154 Conn. App. 470 , 486, 106 A.3d 309 (2014) ("[b]ecause we assume, without deciding, that the challenged comments were improper, we move directly to the second step of the analysis and address whether the prosecutor's remarks were harmful"), cert. denied, 316 Conn. 903 , 111 A.3d 471 (20 2018"The two steps of [our] analysis are separate and distinct, and we may reject the claim if we conclude that the defendant has failed to establish either prong." State v. Danovan T. , 176 Conn. App. 637 , 644, 170 A.3d 722 (2017), cert. denied, 327 Conn. 992 , 175 A.3d 1247 (2018) ; see also State v. Aviles , 154 Conn. App. 470 , 486, 106 A.3d 309 (2014) ("[b]ecause we assume, without deciding, that the challenged comments were improper, we move directly to the second step of the analysis and address whether the prosecutor's remarks were harmful"), cert. denied, 316 Conn. 903 , 111 A.3d 471 (20 | 1 | 2018–2018 |
State v. Danovan T.
neutral
2 sentences2018"The two steps of [our] analysis are separate and distinct, and we may reject the claim if we conclude that the defendant has failed to establish either prong." State v. Danovan T. , 176 Conn. App. 637 , 644, 170 A.3d 722 (2017), cert. denied, 327 Conn. 992 , 175 A.3d 1247 (2018) ; see also State v. Aviles , 154 Conn. App. 470 , 486, 106 A.3d 309 (2014) ("[b]ecause we assume, without deciding, that the challenged comments were improper, we move directly to the second step of the analysis and address whether the prosecutor's remarks were harmful"), cert. denied, 316 Conn. 903 , 111 A.3d 471 (20 2018"The two steps of [our] analysis are separate and distinct, and we may reject the claim if we conclude that the defendant has failed to establish either prong." State v. Danovan T. , 176 Conn. App. 637 , 644, 170 A.3d 722 (2017), cert. denied, 327 Conn. 992 , 175 A.3d 1247 (2018) ; see also State v. Aviles , 154 Conn. App. 470 , 486, 106 A.3d 309 (2014) ("[b]ecause we assume, without deciding, that the challenged comments were improper, we move directly to the second step of the analysis and address whether the prosecutor's remarks were harmful"), cert. denied, 316 Conn. 903 , 111 A.3d 471 (20 | 1 | 2018–2018 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.